1 / 12

Academic Senate Update

Academic Senate Update. Academic Prioritization & Recovery Planning Committee Cal Poly Pomona February 14, 2007. Outline. Committee Charge Membership SPPC Committee Formation Timeline Environmental Scan Data Collection & Analysis Types of Recommendations Future Steps. PRPC Charge - 1.

danica
Download Presentation

Academic Senate Update

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Academic Senate Update Academic Prioritization & Recovery Planning CommitteeCal Poly PomonaFebruary 14, 2007 PRP Committee, Cal Poly Pomona

  2. Outline • Committee Charge • Membership • SPPC Committee Formation • Timeline • Environmental Scan • Data Collection & Analysis • Types of Recommendations • Future Steps PRP Committee, Cal Poly Pomona

  3. PRPC Charge - 1 • Identify all academic and nonacademic programs within Academic Affairs. • Identify any commonalities among the programs for the purpose of grouping the programs. • Set up the common criteria for each group of programs by which each program will be examined for recommending increased support, decrease support, restructuring, or discontinuing. PRP Committee, Cal Poly Pomona

  4. PRPC Charge - 2 • Collect quantitative and qualitative data from various sources such as colleges, schools, departments, or institutional research, which could support such recommendations. • Analyze data based on the criteria developed by the committee and propose recommendations. • Report findings to the University President and the Academic Senate. PRP Committee, Cal Poly Pomona

  5. Members • Dr. Phillip R. Rosenkrantz (Chair) - Industrial & Manuf. Engineering • Prof. Kip A. Dickson (Vice Chair) - Architecture • Dr. Nancy Prince-Cohen (Secretary) - Education • Dr. Liliane M. Fucaloro - English & Foreign Languages • Dr. Tomás D. Morales - Provost & Vice President of Academic Affairs • Dr. Barbara J. Way - Dean, CLASS • Ms. Marian Sherman - Program Coordinator, Faculty Center for Professional Development • Ms. Stevi Sterns – ASI Representative PRP Committee, Cal Poly Pomona

  6. Support Programs Prioritization Committee (SPPC) • Two members from each division • Academic Affairs members are Don Straney and Don Hoyt • SPPC has adopted the same basic criteria created by the PRPC. Will revise indicators. • President Ortiz has asked the SPPC to have recommendations by the end of Summer Quarter • Merging of recommendations by combined trustee committee PRP Committee, Cal Poly Pomona

  7. Timeline of PRPC Activities • Development Phase – Su 2005 – W 2006 • Data Collection Phase – S 2006 – Su 2006 • Analysis Phase – F 2007, ongoing • Analysis • Recommendations • Continuous Improvement Phase PRP Committee, Cal Poly Pomona

  8. Environmental Scan • RFP to update our environmental scan • Use by both prioritization committees, VPs, Deans, IRAP, WASC committees, and anyone else who may need the information. PRP Committee, Cal Poly Pomona

  9. Data Collection and Analysis • 3000 pages of data have been collected. • Rich data set available for use by the entire campus • 13 criteria scored and evaluated. Each criterion discussed and evaluated individually. • 3 using quantitative data • 1 using a combination of quantitative and qualitative data • 9 using qualitative data (narratives) PRP Committee, Cal Poly Pomona

  10. Data Collection and Analysis • Template information being used regularly by the Office of the Provost and other committees. • The Office of Academic Resources • The WASC Capacity and Preparatory Review Committee • The Office of Research and Graduate Studies PRP Committee, Cal Poly Pomona

  11. Types of Recommendations • Enhanced funding • Status quo • Decreased funding • Merging with another program/department • Discontinuance PRP Committee, Cal Poly Pomona

  12. Ongoing Process • In the process of: • Evaluating each program holistically • Examining academic affairs as a whole • Will consult with colleges for clarification as needed throughout the process PRP Committee, Cal Poly Pomona

More Related