1 / 50

US Hegemony and Military Primacy

US Hegemony and Military Primacy. Andres Gannon, UC Berkeley. Section 1 – What is it?. Definition. Hegemony is a condition of dominance in the international system Hegemony is not a strategy, it is a goal or the result of other strategies. Hegemony in international relations.

dava
Download Presentation

US Hegemony and Military Primacy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. US Hegemony and Military Primacy Andres Gannon, UC Berkeley

  2. Section 1 – What is it?

  3. Definition • Hegemony is a condition of dominance in the international system • Hegemony is not a strategy, it is a goal or the result of other strategies

  4. Hegemony in international relations • Goal of the United States and all other powers is hegemony • Regional hegemonshave always existed • Arguable about whether or not there has ever been a global hegemony

  5. How does America do it? • Example of US Hegemony

  6. Section 2 – Determinants of Hegemony

  7. Economic Power • The productive capacity of a state or territory that it rules over • What can a state make? • How efficiently can it do it?

  8. Financial Power • Distinct from economic power because it is about how much money a government can raise and how it manages its funds • US has had strong financial and economic power since 1919 due to victory in both world wars • The US was able to make a lot of equipment and lend huge amounts of money to our allies

  9. Soft Power • The cultural appeal of a country • Intangible reputation • How attractive values are to others • Respect for their way of life

  10. Military Power • The ability to impose your will onto others • It allows us to quickly defeat adversaries

  11. Relationship between determinants

  12. Relationship between determinants • No one factor can maintain hegemony • Soviet Union 1980

  13. Section 3 – US National Security Strategy

  14. U.S. National Security Strategy

  15. Grand Strategy • Plan to direct all assets at the disposal of our government towards the broadest ends of American interest • Homeland security • International peace • Prevention of global wars • Democracy • Economic prosperity • Human rights

  16. Military Strategy • Military portion of grand strategy • Where are our military assets deployed

  17. Operations • Only relevant in war-time • Describes how we fight a series of battles (a campaign) to fulfill the plans laid down • Goal of operations is to fulfill strategic goals and military strategy

  18. Tactical • Methods that units use to achieve specific battle field tasks • Pinning an enemy by flanking them on both sides • Guerilla warfare tactic • Capturing strategic terrain (hill)

  19. Doctrine • Rules we create to govern the use of force and methods we use to fight • Counterinsurgency • Counterterrorism • The way we implement a doctrine in a specific country is a strategy

  20. World War II Example

  21. Military strategy on the topic • Most affirmatives occur at the level of military strategy • How are goals accomplished with the military in general • Withdrawing all forces from one country changes military strategy

  22. Section 4 –Key Terms, Ideas, and People

  23. Synonyms • Hegemony • Primacy • Leadership • Global cop • Pax Americana • Unipolarity • Unilateralism • Military dominance • Global superiority

  24. Key Authors • Khalilzad, Stillgood • Robert Kagan • Lieber and Press • Charles Krauthammer • Thayer • Brooks and Wohlforth • Joseph Nye • Colin Gray • Mandelbaum • Max Boot

  25. Key Sources • Carnegie Endowment • Council on Foreign Relations • Heritage Foundation

  26. Polarity • Unipolarity – only one great power exists • Bipolarity – two powerful states that dominate all the others • Multipolarity – many states of equivalent power

  27. “-lateralism” • Unilateralism – acting alone without making policies dependent on what allies think • Multilateralism – acting with others and engaging in cooperation and consultation • Bilateralism – acting or cooperating with another power, often of equal power

  28. Balancing • Offshore Balancing – Withdrawing our foreign commitments and maintaining our military and international presence from the mainland • Counterbalancing – When countries line up against the United States so that their combined power matched or exceeds that of the hegemon • Softbalancing – diplomatic friction against a hegemon when countries are hesitant to cooperate or support hegemonic military action

  29. Section 5 – Sustainability

  30. Key Factors • Economics • Forward deployment, army, navy, tech, free riders • Counter-balancing • Adversaries who don’t like taking orders • Decadence • Spirit of sacrifice causes power • 22,000 Central Pacific v 4,000 Iraq • 100,000 British

  31. Key Factors • Overstretch • Forces get spread thin • Relative Decline • Rise of other challengers causes multipolarity • Relative power • History • Rome, Sparta, Athens, Persia, Greece, Aztecs, Mayans, Chinese, Mongols, Spanish…US?

  32. The Case for Sustainability • American exceptionalism • Democratic • Western hemisphere • No counterbalancing • No direct colonization • Geography • Relative dominance • Spend more on defense than next 10-25 countries • Economy is third globally • Fight 3 wars at a time

  33. The Case for Sustainability • Absence of peer competitors • China can’t win wars • Russia is poor and can’t win wars either • Europe is internally divided and lazy • Better than alternatives • China is hated • Russia is crazy

  34. Why Sustainability Matters • If decline can be avoided (if hegemony is sustainable) then it is easier to win that it is desirable • If decline is inevitable, strategies to maintain it may be bad and we should shift now to ensure a stable and peaceful transition

  35. Section 5 – Desirability

  36. Great Power Wars • Smaller powers have an incentive to cooperate with a greater power because the US can punish them military • Multipolar systems are problematic because the margins of power between actors is low • Europe 1914

  37. Rise of Hostile Competitors • Strong US can deter others from even trying to upset the international system

  38. Regional Wars • US can intervene in wars between weaker states • Bosnia, 1994 • Kosovo, 1998 • Gulf War, 1991 • North Korea, TBA • India-Pakistan, TBA • China-Taiwan, TBA • Israel-Iran, TBA

  39. Cooperation • Bandwagoning – when smaller states follow the lead of a hegemon and support them rather than counterbalancing • Encourages cooperation on economic, environmental, and health issues

  40. Transition Wars • Regardless of whether hegemony is good or bad, decline should be avoided because the transition to a new system will be violent • Rising powers would lash out to undermine US standing • US would lash out to prevent a rising power from overwhelming us

  41. Power Vacuum • No one else can fill in causing global fragmentation (Dark Ages) • Partial fill in causes spheres of influence • China dominates East Asia • Russia reabsorbs former Soviet states

  42. Section 6 – Undesirability

  43. Multipolarity Solves • More stable, aggressive posture encourages hostility when power erodes • Spheres of influence good

  44. Terrorism • Causes resentment in the Middle East • Occupation • Hostility

  45. Proliferation • Causes asymetrical strategies to compete with us since they can’t compete conventionally • Nuclear weapons pack a hard punch

  46. Counter-balancing • Others band together against the US which can escalate regional wars and disputes • Russia-China

  47. Intervention • Hegemony makes us more likely to intervene in conflicts where we don’t belong • Vietnam • Iraq

  48. Section 7 - Conclusion

  49. Key Arguments • Sustainability • Resentment inevitable • Reintervention • Transition • Fill in • Balancing

More Related