1 / 35

Breakout Session #401

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST – ORGANIZATIONAL & PERSONAL. Breakout Session #401 Raymond S.E. Pushkar, Esq., Partner McKenna Long & Aldridge LLP, Washington, D.C. Date: Monday, April 23, 2007 Time: 10:45 am – 11:45 am. Organizational Conflicts of Interest.

dawson
Download Presentation

Breakout Session #401

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CONFLICTS OF INTEREST – ORGANIZATIONAL & PERSONAL Breakout Session #401 Raymond S.E. Pushkar, Esq., PartnerMcKenna Long & Aldridge LLP, Washington, D.C. Date: Monday, April 23, 2007 Time: 10:45 am – 11:45 am

  2. Organizational Conflicts of Interest • Government Interest is fair, competitive, and unbiased performance of a government contract (FAR Subpart 9.5) • Involves Agency Acquisition Planning

  3. Organizational Conflicts of Interest • There are Four Basic FAR Rules (9.505) for Analysis and Avoidance of OCI

  4. Rule 1: Systems Engineering & Technical Direction Contracts • Contractor not to be awarded prime supply contract for the system or subcontractor • Includes substantially all representative list of tasks (FAR 9.505-1)

  5. Rule 2: Specifications & Statements of Work Contracts • Contractor for non-development items not to be awarded prime contract to furnish items or subcontract(FAR 9-505-2)

  6. Rule 2: Specifications & Statements of Work Contracts (Cont’d) • Exclusions: • Supplementing other specifications provided by the government • Helping agency to prepare or refine under the control of agency

  7. Rule 2: Specifications & Statements of Work Contracts (Cont’d) • Rule 2 only applies to competitive contracts for non-developmental items (e.g., prototype does not bar contractor from follow-on contracts for further development and production)

  8. Rule 2: Specifications & Statements of Work Contracts (Cont’d) • Rule 2 does not apply to non-competitive procurements (e.g., sole source or non-competitive follow-ons) • Restrictions apply for “reasonable time”

  9. Rule 3: Technical EvaluationContracts • Contracts for technical evaluation of other contractors’ products or advisory assistance services may not be awarded to contractors who would evaluate or advise agency on their own product (FAR 9.505-3)

  10. Rule 3: Technical EvaluationContracts (Cont’d) • Proper safeguards can ensure objectivity • Contracting Officer has discretion for safeguards

  11. Rule 4: Access to Proprietary Data of Other Contractors in Performing Advisory Services (FAR 9.505-4) • May Not Take Advantage of Same • Government requires non-disclosure agreement to protect proprietary information

  12. Rule 4: Access to Proprietary Data of Other Contractors in Performing Advisory Services (FAR 9.505-4) (Cont’d) • Contractor can bid on subsequent production contracts provided it does not use the proprietary data covered by non-disclosure agreement • No OCI if data has fallen into public domain

  13. Implementation of Rules (FAR 9.506) • Role of CO is to identify “significant potential OCI” • Must prepare written analysis and plan for avoiding or mitigating OCI

  14. Implementation of Rules (FAR 9.506) (Cont’d) • Could involve solicitation language identifying nature and duration of potential conflict and restraints on offerors/awardees • CO given “sound discretion,” protest cases illustrate

  15. Implementation of Rules (FAR 9.506) (Cont’d) • Government has burden of anticipating OCI and for mitigation plans, but some agencies shift that burden to contractors (e.g., DOE, EPA, by rules)

  16. Penalties for OCI • Loss of contract opportunities • If disclosures in bidding are inaccurate or wrong, criminal false statements may apply (18 U.S.C. 1001) • Suspension or debarment under FAR Part 9.1

  17. Marketing Consultants (FAR 9.501) • Contractors must disclose activities • Offerors must certify no unfair competitive advantage • FAR defines as “independent” contractors who furnish advice, information, direction, or assistance to offeror or contractor

  18. Marketing Consultants (FAR 9.501) (Cont’d) • Exclusions from definition: • “Advisory assistance” services under FAR 37.2; • Routine engineering and technical services;

  19. Marketing Consultants (FAR 9.501) (Cont’d) • Legal, actuarial, auditing, and accounting services; and • Training services • Bottom line: • OCI rules apply to marketing consultants

  20. Personal Conflicts of Interest • Prohibition of situations in which interests of persons inside government or recently departed from such service conflict with person’s responsibilities as a present or past federal employee (18 USC 207 & 208) NOTE: Sections 207 & 208 do not apply to enlisted members of armed forces because they are not officers or employees (Joint Ethics Regulation, DOD 5500.7-R, extends the requirements to enlisted)

  21. Personal Conflicts of Interest(Cont’d) • Personal financial interest conflict • Employment restrictions • Military personnel (pensions)

  22. Other Post-Employment Restrictions • Permanent restrictions • Former government employee cannot make appearance, influence, communicate before a department in a particular matter where: • U.S. or D.C. is a party or has substantial interest; or • Former officer or employee participated personally or substantially in the particular matter in his/her official capacity

  23. Other Post-Employment Restrictions(Cont’d) • One-year restrictions: • Trade & treaty matters • Advice on ongoing trade or treaty negotiations if personally and substantially participated in on behalf of U.S.; had access to treaty or trade negotiations and knew or should have known information was exempt from disclosure

  24. Other Post-Employment Restrictions(Cont’d) • Senior Personnel • One-year prohibition from representing another party before agency from which he/she was terminated

  25. Other Post-Employment Restrictions(Cont’d) • Very Senior Personnel • One-year prohibition • Includes Executive Schedule I to V – Vice President of the United States and Executive Office of the President – at set levels

  26. Other Post-Employment Restrictions(Cont’d) • Members of Congress and Staff • One-year prohibition similar to those imposed on senior and very senior executive employees

  27. Other Post-Employment Restrictions(Cont’d) • Two-Year Restrictions • Executive Branch Employees • Prohibited from knowingly making, with intent to influence, any communication or appearance before an agency on behalf of another in connection with particular matters in which US or DC is a party or has direct & substantial interest and former employee knows or should know that the particular matter was actually pending under his/her official responsibility within one year before termination of employment

  28. Violations/Penalties • Penalties Vary • Imprisonment of not more than one year and $50,000 for each violation, conspiracy, aiding and abetting, false statements in certification or report • Suspension and debarment

  29. Conflicts Under Procurement Integrity Act & Regulations • Governed by 41 USC 423 and FAR Part 3.104 • Restrictions on Former Agency Officials’ Acceptance of Compensation From a Contractor

  30. Conflicts Under Procurement Integrity Act & Regulations (Cont’d) • One-year prohibition after official: • Served as PCO SSA, SSB, chief of financial or technical team in which contractor was selected • Award must be for contracts in excess of $10 million

  31. Conflicts Under Procurement Integrity Act & Regulations (Cont’d) • Served as program manager, deputy, or ACO for contract in excess of $10 million • Personally made decision to award contract/subcontract, modification, or delivery order to contractor in excess of $10 million • Established overhead rates valued in excess of $10 million

  32. Conflicts Under Procurement Integrity Act & Regulations (Cont’d) • Approved payment to contractor in excess of $10 million • Paid or settled claim of contractor if in excess of $10 million

  33. Conflicts Under Procurement Integrity Act & Regulations (Cont’d) • Exceptions • No prohibition against compensation from a division or affiliate of contractor that does not produce same or similar products or services • Law provides contractor must make careful inquiries before providing compensation

  34. Conflicts Under Procurement Integrity Act & Regulations (Cont’d) • Should contact agency ethics officer prior to offering/providing compensation to former government employee • Good-faith reliance on agency ethics official protects against allegations of violations of Procurement Integrity Act

More Related