320 likes | 518 Views
Overview of the Phase I Market. Ken Getz Tufts CSDD; CISCRP O ctober, 2010. Agenda. Overview of the Drug Development Landscape The Phase I Market Key Market Trends Optimization Opportunities. Overview of the Drug Development Landscape. Commercialization Conditions
E N D
Overview of the Phase I Market Ken Getz Tufts CSDD; CISCRP October, 2010
Agenda Overview of the Drug Development Landscape The Phase I Market Key Market Trends Optimization Opportunities
Overview of the Drug Development Landscape Commercialization Conditions • Restrictive price controls • Healthcare reform uncertainty and adverse impact • Depressed global markets • High-level of revenue at risk R&D Operating Conditions • Low success rates • Declining levels of innovation • Rapidly rising R&D costs • Regulatory conservatism • Public discontent
Declining Rate of Innovation per R&D Dollar R&D Expenditures New Drug Approvals * Trend line is 3-year moving average R&D expenditures adjusted for inflation Source: Tufts CSDD Approved NCE Database, PhRMA, 2008
R&D Cost Drivers Chronic and complex indications Clinical trial size Protocol design complexity Patient recruitment/retention High cost discovery/research tools Regulatory demands Market oriented studies Late-stage attrition
Downsizing and Consolidation Announced and Planned Layoffs (2008 - 2010) Source: WSJ
Outsourcing Demand * ($US Billions) *Note: Does not include pass-through clinical services (e.g., central lab fees, investigator grants) Source: TCSDD
Distribution of FDA-Regulated Investigators Percent of Total 1572s Filed 1997 2001 2005 2009 Sources: Tufts CSDD
Protocol Complexity Phase I Phase II Phase III Phase IV Unique Procedures (mean) 30.3 29.2 28.4 26.4 Growth in Unique Procedures 35.10% 35.60% 42.1% 63.20% Total Procedures (mean) 221.8 156.3 147.5 93.9 Growth in Total Procedures 13.40% -1.30% 10.9% -2.4% Total Work Burden (mean) 58.4 43.4 43.1 28.4 Growth in Total Work Burden 70.20% 32.80% 59.7% 58.10% Note: Growth rates reflect the change in mean values of protocols in 2000-2003 and 2004-2007. Source: Tufts CSDD
Total Global Phase I SpendingUS $ in Billions CAGR 15.6% Source: Parexel Sourcebook
Number of Active Phase I Drugs in Development Worldwide CAGR = 10.2% Source: Parexel Sourcebook
Clinical Research Phase Comparisons Sources: Parexel International
Development Pipeline by Phase Source: Parexel International
Active Phase I Drugs by Major TA Source: IMS R&D Focus
Distribution of Active Clinical Trials Source:Opperheimer 2008 Analysis of Clinicaltrials.Gov,
Market Share in 2009 of Global Phase I Facilities Sources: Tufts CSDD
Facility Locations Source: Company Publications
Key Trends Shaping the Phase I Market • Heightened safety concerns • Emphasis on hospital and in-patient-like settings • Shift to US and Canada for time and cost advantages post EU Directive • Increasing proportion of patients vs. healthy volunteers • Modified and combination protocol designs • Transfer operating risk to CROs • Growing receptivity and entry by for-profit, community-based investigative sites Source: Tufts CSDD interviews
Clinical Personnel Growth Source: PhRMA Industry Profiles
Phase I Spending Overall and for Outsourcing(US $ in Billions) Source: Jeffries & Company
Total Direct Cost per Patient by Phase(2007-2009) Source:TTC
Supporting Investigative Sites for Success Sources: TCSDD Survey of 3,516 Sites, 2010
1991 Committee on Competitiveness • Pharmaceutical and Biotechnology industries are national treasures • Most innovative and productive relative to other R&D-intensive industries • Saves lives and lowers the burden of health care costs • Most financially healthy (robust revenue and profit) • Major contributor to the economy
Public Confidence and Trust in the CRE Sources: Research!America (JAMA, 2005); Ohmann (2004); HarrisInteractive (2002, 2004, 2007)
By Extension… Study Volunteers ‘Who makes a better contribution to mankind?’ • Desperate (~29% believe only seriously-ill participate) • Risk Takers (80% believe participants are ‘gambling’ with their health) • Ambivalently respected (34% ‘Don’t Admire’ study volunteers) Source: CISCRP, 2006; N=900
CISCRP: Collective Public and Patient Outreach • CISCRP Membership • Post Trial Communication • Patient Ambassadors • AWARE for All • ‘Medical Heroes’ PSA • Media Outreach • Science Museums • Speakers Bureau • Search Clinical Trials • Legislation • Social Media Outreach • Site/CTSA Support • HC Provider Education • Pharmacy-directed education • ‘Voice of the Patient’ • Medical Community Outreach
Impact of Protocol Complexity and Burden(All TAs, All Phases) Source: Tufts CSDD
Conclusions • Current drug development landscape necessitating major changes in how global clinical research will be conducted • Phase I market an area of unprecedented change and opportunity to improve drug development performance and efficiency • Volume of activity • Economics • Structure • Opportunities to improve Phase I success • Patient/public outreach and education • Protocol design simplification
Ken Getz Senior Research Fellow, Assistant Professor Tufts CSDD, Tufts Medical School 617-636-3487, Kenneth.getz@tufts.edu Founder and Board Chair CISCRP 617-725-2750, kengetz@ciscrp.org THANK YOU!