10 likes | 190 Views
ISAR-REACT 3. Primary endpoint: death, MI, urgent target vessel revascularization, or in-hospital major bleeding was similar between the bivalirudin (8.3%) and UFH (8.7%) arms (p = 0.57) Bleeding significantly ↓ with bivalirudin compared with UFH: major (33%), minor (31%). (p = 0.57).
E N D
ISAR-REACT 3 Primary endpoint: death, MI, urgent target vessel revascularization, or in-hospital major bleeding was similar between the bivalirudin (8.3%) and UFH (8.7%) arms (p = 0.57) Bleeding significantly ↓ with bivalirudin compared with UFH: major (33%), minor (31%) (p = 0.57) (p = 0.008) 8.3 8.7 3.1 4.6 10 5 8 4 7 6 3 % % 5 2 4 3 2 1 0 0 Bivalirudin (n = 2,289) UFH (n = 2,281) Trial design:Troponin-negative patients undergoing PCI were randomized to either bivalirudin or unfractionated heparin (UFH), after pretreatment with 600 mg of clopidogrel. Clinical outcomes were evaluated at 30 days. Results 9 Conclusions • Bivalirudin is not superior to UFH as adjunct anticoagulation therapy for troponin-negative patients undergoing PCI, who were pretreated with 600 mg of clopidogrel • Bleeding was significantly reduced with bivalirudin compared with UFH 1 Composite endpoint Major bleeding Presented by Dr. Adnan Kastrati at SCAI-ACC i2 Summit/ACC 2008