1 / 20

DDS design status Task 9.2-Sub-task 2

DDS design status Task 9.2-Sub-task 2 . Alessandro D’Elia on behalf of Roger M. Jones. CLIC_DDS_A. PRELIMINARY. CLIC_DDS_B. Analysis of structures with different phase advances: 5 /9 and 5 /6 in comparison with the standard 2 /3

deon
Download Presentation

DDS design status Task 9.2-Sub-task 2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. DDS design statusTask 9.2-Sub-task 2 Alessandro D’Elia on behalf of Roger M. Jones

  2. CLIC_DDS_A PRELIMINARY

  3. CLIC_DDS_B • Analysis of structures with different phase advances: 5/9 and 5/6 in comparison with the standard 2/3 • The basic idea is to explore if we can find a compromise between a possible larger bandwidth (5/9) to the detriment of higher kicks or lower kicks (5/6) to the detriment of a smaller bandwidth New Design: better but still not in the limits

  4. Comparative tables

  5. 2/3 Linear tapering To efficiently damp the first trailing bunch staying this detuning (~2.5GHz), we would need a <Q>~14

  6. 5/9 Linear tapering Quite high kicks and a very high-Q resonance in the 5th-7th bands

  7. First Cell 5pi/6 Mid Cell Last Cell

  8. 5pi/6 Linear tapering Last Cell <Qdip>=495 <Qdip>=184 Q=1438 (not yet saturated)

  9. First Dipole Wake Linear tapering <Qdip>=382  dipole kick=61 V/pc mm m Even if we get rid of the “higher” higher order modes, we are not able to efficiently damp first trailing bunches staying this detuning (~2.2GHz) and this damping (<Q>~382)

  10. Change Manifold Width If I change WGW: Dipole distribution stays the same but Manifold mode distribution will become higher and will “squash” against dipoles. This will move back the avoided crossing region. Drawback is a reduction of avoided crossing and a slight reduction of the fsyn of the cell. WGW=5mm Light Line WGW=6mm Dipole Manifold First Cell, WGW=5mm But…

  11. Tapered Manifold Width First Cell Last Cell

  12. Linear tapering

  13. Linear tapering Previous wake

  14. 1st Cell E-Field@27GHz-7th Band

  15. Mid Cell E-Field@25.2GHz-5th Band

  16. Last Cell E-Field@24.88GHz-5th Band

  17. Brillouin Diagram–EField 1st Cell Mid Cell 7th Band Coupling 7th Band 6th Band Hybrid 6th Band 5th Band 5th Band Last Cell 7th Band No Coupling 6th Band 5th Band Dangerous 5th Band Last Cell

  18. Different cell geometries 3.2mm

  19. Conclusions • 5/9 (100 phase advance) structure exhibits, as expected, higher kicks than 2/3 without any improvement in bandwidth (only 30MHz!) • 5/6: • Pulse temperature rise limits the aperture of first iris to be lower than 4.3mm • This implies that in order to have a reasonable bandwidth last iris aperture must be well below 3mm • Iris aperture lower than 3mm exhibits enhancement in the kicks of 5th-7thband • This enhancement is difficult to cure • From this analysis it comes out that: • With <Eacc>=100MV/m it looks very difficult to meet at the same time both CLIC beam dynamics (long range wake) and RF constraints • For CLIC_Zero with <Eacc>=80MV/m there could be some margin • Nevertheless, CLIC_DDS_A prototype is (almost) ready to be tested: breakdown measurements will be crucial for DDS • Started to apply DDS design to other facilities (ELI) and the results are very promising

More Related