140 likes | 258 Views
Business Politics and Policy Making in Latin America. Ben Ross Schneider Department of Political Science Northwestern University. A Tale of Two Coffee Sectors. Brazil: state control, low quality, and declining consumption, little dialogue with growers
E N D
Business Politics and Policy Making in Latin America Ben Ross SchneiderDepartment of Political ScienceNorthwestern University
A Tale of Two Coffee Sectors • Brazil: state control, low quality, and declining consumption, little dialogue with growers • Colombia: high quality, private regulation, close collaboration between growers and the state • Why? Federacafe
Overview • Portfolio framework for analyzing business politics • Comparative examination of patterns of business politics in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Colombia, and Mexico • Assessment of how various types of policy encourage different political responses from business
Portfolio analysis of business investment in politics • Business associations • Campaign contributions and lobbying • Personal networks • Corruption
Political Activities of Associations • Visibility in media • Direct contacts with policy makers • Distant relations with politicians and parties • Representation on consultative or policy councils
Elections, Campaign Finance, and Lobbying • Legal framework greatly restricts private sector funding • Yet millions of dollars flow from business to politicians • Contributions may not buy much influence -- low reelection rate -- narrow impact, collective weakness -- insurance contributions
Negotiating Trade Agreements • Chile, Mexico, and Colombia relied on “cuarto al lado” model of consultation between business and government • Business participation mediated by associations • In Brazil and Argentina negotiations for Mercosur excluded business
Conclusions • Root causes of variation in patterns of business politics usually found in prior government actions • Patterns of business politics are fairly stable over time, yet still subject to change through policy • Business influence on policy more likely to be positive when its participation is formal, encompassing, organized, and transparent