1 / 51

Flow Control in Oil/Gas Wells and Pipelines

Flow Control in Oil/Gas Wells and Pipelines. Trial Lecture. Ph.D Dissertation Even Solbraa 14.February 2003. Outline. 1. Introduction to flow control 2. Multi-phase flow with emphasis on slug flow 3. Stabilization of flow in Oil/Gas wells and pipelines

dolf
Download Presentation

Flow Control in Oil/Gas Wells and Pipelines

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Flow Control in Oil/Gas Wells and Pipelines Trial Lecture Ph.D Dissertation Even Solbraa14.February 2003

  2. Outline 1. Introduction to flow control 2. Multi-phase flow with emphasis on slug flow 3. Stabilization of flow in Oil/Gas wells and pipelines 4. Examples of flow control for selected oil and gas fields 5. Conclusions

  3. Norwegian Oil and Gas Production • Platforms • Floating production units • Pipelines directly to shore • Oil to refineries • Gas exported to Europe (illustrations: Statoil picture library)

  4. Trends and Facts in Oil and Gas Production • Few new ‘giant’ oil and gas fields are likely to be discovered • More than a quarter of the world’s oil and more than 15% of its natural gas lies offshore • Most of the new discoveries are expected to occur offshore • New large fields are probable in deep waters • Develop new and cost effective solutions for small fields • Multiphase transport directly to shore • Tie-in of well stream from sub sea installation to platform (Oliemans, 1994, Sarica and Tengesdal, 2000)

  5. Multiphase Transport Solutions The Åsgard field:Floating production system The Snøhvit solution:Transport directly to shore (www.statoil.com)

  6. Multi-Phase Fluid Flow (Oil/Water/Gas)

  7. What is the sea depth of future fields ? • Norwegian Sea 1500 meter • Gulf of Mexico 2500 meter • West Africa 1500 meter • Brazil 300 meter • Caspian Sea 600 meter • Venezuela 300 meter Common: Deep water nature of the provinces

  8. Callenges for Deep Water Developments (Hassanein and Fairhurst, BP 1997)

  9. Flow Control • The ability to actively or passively manipulate a flow field in order to effect a beneficial change. • (Gad-el-Hak, 1989)

  10. Flow assurance • The ability to produce hydrocarbon fluids economically from the reservoir to export over the life of a field in any environment. • (Forsdyke 1997) • Challenges: • Hydrates • Wax/paraffin deposition Fluid control • Scale • Emulsions • Slugging Flow control • Sand

  11. Flow control: emulsion viscosity Oil-water mixtures: Increase in viscosity close to inversion point Use of emulsion breaker to lower viscosity

  12. Sand Control • Sand will follow the oil and gas from the reservoir • Sand can deposit in the pipeline and process equipment • Oscillating pressure and well production will increase sand production

  13. Outline 1. Introduction to flow control 2. Multi-phase flow with emphasis on slug flow 3. Stabilization of flow in Oil/Gas wells and pipelines 4. Examples of flow control for selected oil and gas fields 5. Conclusions

  14. Multiphase Transport • Flow with one or several components in more than one phase • Gas-liquid flows • Gas-solid flows • Liquid-solid flows • Three-phase flows (e.g. gas-oil-water) • Simulation tools • Industry standard: OLGA (two fluid model) • PETRA objectoriented implementation in C++

  15. Horizontal Two-Phase Flow • Segregated flow • Stratified • Annular • Wavy • Intermittent • Slug flow • Plug flow • Distributive flow • Bubble/mist flow • Froth flow

  16. Example – horizontal slug flow From Multiphase Flow Laboratory, Trondheim Movie provided by John-Morten Godhavn, Statoil

  17. Inclined flow • Waves!

  18. Horizontal Flow Map -1° +1° Bubble • Flow pattern map for horizontal flow • Often specified in terms of superficial velocity of the phases Slug Annular Stratified Stratified Wavy

  19. Vertical flow • Bubble flow • Continuous liquid phase with dispersed bubbles of gas • Slug flow • Large gas bubbles • Slugs of liquid (with small bubbles) inbetween • Churn flow • Bubbles start to coalesce • Up and down motion of liquid • Annular flow • Gas becomes the continuous phase • Droplets in the gas phase

  20. Example - vertical flow Slug flow Bubble flow From Multiphase Flow Laboratory, Trondheim Movies provided by John-Morten Godhavn, Statoil

  21. Vertical Flow Map • Partly dependent on upstream geometry

  22. Slug Flow -A fascinating but unwanted and damaging flow pattern

  23. Consequences of Slugging • Variations in flowrate to 1.stage separator • Shutdowns, bad separation, level variations • Pressure pulses, vibrations and tearing on equipment • Flow rate measurement problems • Variations in gasflow • Pressure variations • Liquid entrainment in gas outlet • Flaring • Flow rate measurement problems

  24. Slug Flow Classification • ”Normal” steady slugs – Hydrodynamic slugging • Unaffected by compressibility • Incompressible gas (high pressure) or high liquid rate • Normally not an operational problem • Short period • Slugs generated by compressibility effects • Severe slugging in a riser system (riser induced) • Hilly terrain slugs (terrain induced) • Other transient compressible effects • Long period • Transient slugs • Generated while changing inlet rate • Reservoir induced slug flow

  25. Slug flow generation Hydrodynamic slug growth Two criteria: • Wave growth due to Kelvin Helmholtz instabilities • Slug growth criteria (the slug has to grow to be stable) (Oliemans 1994)

  26. Hydrodynamic slugging • Formed when waves reach the upper pipe wall; the liquid blocks the pipe, and waves grows to slugs • Short slugs with high frequency • Gas rate, liquid rate and topography influences degree of slugging • Triggers riser slugging Eksempel fra flerfaseanlegget på Tiller.

  27. Annulus Slugs from Gas Lift • Gas lift is a technology to produce oil and gas from wells with low reservoir pressure • Gas lifts can result in highly oscillating well flow • Casing-heading instabilities

  28. Slug formation in pipeline/riser • Initiation and Slug formation • Gas velocity too low to sustain liquid film in riser • Liquid blocking • Gas pressure increases in pipe • No/low production • Slug production • Gas pressure equals liquid head • Liquid accelerates when gas enters riser • Large peak in liquid flow rate • Gas blow down • Pressure drops as gas enters riser • Gas bubbles become continuous, liquid film at wall • Gas velocity too low... • Liquid fallback • Liquid film flows down the riser

  29. Conditions for severe slugging • Flow maps for pipe/riser • Conditions from literature • Bøe ’81, Taitel et al ’90, Schmidt et al ’85, Fuchs ‘87 • Pressure limits • Depend on pipe geometry • Based on steady state analysis • Inaccessible variables • Dynamic simulation • When does slugging occur? • Pipelines with dips and humps • Low gas-oil ratio • Decreasing pressure • Long pipelines • Deep water production

  30. Important Severe Slugging Parameters • Gas and oil flowrate • Pipeline pressure • Upstream geometry Graph from Fuchs (1997)

  31. Important Severe Slugging Parameters Pressure:30 bar • Gas and oil flowrate • Pipeline pressure • Upstream geometry Pressure:50 bar Figures from Fuchs (1997)

  32. Important Severe Slugging Parameters Stright pipe upstream • Gas and oil flowrate • Pipeline pressure • Upstream geometry Pipe buckling upstream

  33. Outline 1. Introduction to multi-phase flow 2. Slug flow 3. Stabilization of flow in Oil/Gas wells and pipelines 4. Examples of flow control on some oil and gas fields 5. Conclusions

  34. Slug reduction/elimination techniques • Design changes • Slug catchers and separators • Rate/GOR change or pressure change • Pipe diameter regulation (use of many smal pipes) (Yocum, 1975) • Gas injection at riser base (Hill, 1990) • Pipe insertion (self induced gaslift) (Sarica & Tengesdal, 2000) • Venturi tubes • Dynamic simulation(Xu et al, 1997) • Operational changes • Choking(Schmidt et al., 1979, Taitel, 1986, Jansen et al., 1996) • Feed-forward control of separator level • Dynamic simulation (Xu et al., 1997) • Pigging operations • Use of flow-improver • Foaming (Hassanein et.al., 1998) • Artificial gas lifts • Optimise well production • Increase gas injection in well • Feedback control • Miniseparators • Active choking • Model based regulation

  35. Robust design - Gas injection at riser base (Hill, 1990) Qgas • + • Reduced static head (weight of liquid) • Prevent severe slugging • Smoothen start-up transients • - • Large amounts of injection gas needed • Extra injection pipe needed

  36. Robust design - Self gas lifting (Sarcia & Tengesdal, 2000) • + • Reduced static head (weight of liquid) • Prevent severe slugging • Smoothen start-up transients • No extra injection gas needed • - • Extra injection pipe needed – will be expensive

  37. Robust operation –Choking(Schmidt et al., 1979, Taitel, 1986, Jansen et al., 1996 ) • + • Higher pressure and smaller severe slug flow regime • Easy and cheap technique • - • Manual work • Lower capacity of pipe

  38. Used as regulation valve SP PIC MV 1.stage separator PT PT D Feedback control –Active Choking(Statoil, 2003) • + • Reduces the slug length by opening the hock valve when the slugs starts to develop – sucks the slug up. • Easy and cheap technique • - • Lower capacity of pipe • Can be a problem for deep waters

  39. OptimizeIT Active Well Control - stabilizes the oil production from the well by active control of the production and/or injection choke Robust operation –Optimize Well Production (ABB)

  40. Annulus Robust operation –Increased/controled gas injection rate in gas lifts • + • Increased gas flow rate and GOR (less chance for severe slugging) • Less static head • - • Increased frictional losses • Joule-Thomson Cooling • Need injection gas

  41. Feedback control -Miniseparators(Hollenberg, 1995, S3TM) • Principle is to keep the mixture flow rate constant through the operation with a control vale. • Difficulty in measuring flowrates is solved by using minisparators • - • Lower capacity of pipe

  42. Slug reduction/elimination techniques • Design changes • Slug catchers and separators • Rate/GOR change or pressure change • Pipe diameter regulation (use of many smal pipes) (Yocum, 1975) • Gas injection at riser base (Hill, 1990) • Pipe insertion (self induced gaslift) (Sarica & Tengesdal, 2000) • Venturi tubes • Dynamic simulation(Xu et al, 1997) • Operational changes • Choking(Schmidt et al., 1979, Taitel, 1986, Jansen et al., 1996) • Feed-forward control of separator level • Dynamic simulation (Xu et al., 1997) • Pigging operations • Use of flow-improver • Foaming (Hassanein et.al., 1998) • Artificial gas lifts • Optimise well production • Increase gas injection in well • Feedback control • Miniseparators • Active choking • Model based regulation

  43. Outline 1. Introduction to flow control and multi-phase flow 2. Slug flow 3. Stabilization of flow in Oil/Gas wells and pipelines 4. Examples of flow control on some oil and gas fields 5. Conclusions

  44. Slugg Control at Heidrun NordflankenUse of active slug control • Simulation before startup indicated slugging • Field measurements after startup proved slugging • Continuous slug regulation since startup • Also in use under startup of new wells D Elevation -355m 4700m

  45. Slugging in riser Heidrun D-line Trykk toppside oppstrøms choke • Large pressure variations • Periods ca. 17 minutes. • Disapears when chocking upstream Tetthet toppside

  46. Active Well Control at Brage A-21

  47. OptimizeIT Active Well Control on Brage A-21 Starting Active Control Pres. [bar] Downhole pressure

  48. Conclusions • Introduction to flow control • Unstable multiphase flow – what, why • Severe slugging in gas/oil pipelines • Methods for control of severe slugging • Still an unresolved problem for deep waters • Successful practical examples

  49. Thanks • Institute for Energy and Process Technology, NTNU • Statoil • Norwegian Research Council • People who have helped my with this trial lecture Lars Imsland, Elling Sletfjerding, John Morten Godhavn

  50. Flow control in petroleum production • Noise suppression • Drag reduction • Water-oil flow • Flow assurance • Slug control • Multiphase flow simulation

More Related