180 likes | 370 Views
Investigation in the Science Classroom. TDP 4280/7280. Information Seeking. Inquiries where children find out, mainly by observing what happens, for example, when eggs hatch, when water freezes, when spiders spin their webs, etc. There is typically no attempt to change things.
E N D
Investigation in the Science Classroom TDP 4280/7280
Information Seeking • Inquiries where children find out, mainly by observing what happens, for example, when eggs hatch, when water freezes, when spiders spin their webs, etc. • There is typically no attempt to change things. • For younger children, these extend experience. • For older children, these are a first step to another kind of investigation.
Action-Testing • These involve children doing something to change the situation being investigated. • This is often very simple, such as putting seeds on a damp paper towel to see if they germinate, etc. • Steps are taken to be sure the effects observed are the results of the change made, and not something else.
Pattern-Finding • These can be an extension of the first two types of investigations. • Emphasis is on making comparisons, looking for patterns, and interpreting the findings (not just what happens) • Questions are raised about whether the relationship between variables is cause-and-effect
How-To-Do-It Investigations • These are problems where the end product/goal is given, and the investigation concerns how to reach it. • They often border between science and technology • Often, the problem is to construct something (a bridge that will hold a certain amount of weight; a pendulum that will swing at a certain rate)
“Cookbook” Investigations • While these can be any of the previous types of investigations, these take the sense-making aspects of the investigation out of the lesson, providing a script of directions for students to follow to arrive at the “right answer” • This results in the activity to being “hands-on” without being “minds-on”
Criticisms of cookbook activities • They promote skills in following directions, but not critical thinking • The result is know beforehand • If the result is not what is expected, the student has failed • They reach a conclusion, rather than leading to further inquiry • They misrepresent the nature of science and how scientists work
Mis-portraying science… • Gets rid of creative element – portrays science as dry and procedural • Authoritarian- someone tells you what the “right answer” is • Implies that a complete answer to all questions is possible • No imagination involved (or needed!) • You don’t try to avoid bias– knowing the answer biases you • No respect for evidence– only matters if you get the “right answer” • Can’t really predict if you already know what happens • Science is subject to change– the outcome to a “recipe” should not! • Social values– someone else decides what is important, what to do and how (doesn’t value students ideas/interests)