1 / 18

Cancer: The Survivorship and Inequality Challenges

Cancer: The Survivorship and Inequality Challenges. Professor Sir Mike Richards July 2010 Leeds. Overview. The Coalition Government Cancer: The Key Challenges Focus on survivorship and inequalities. Coalition Government: Priorities.

dreama
Download Presentation

Cancer: The Survivorship and Inequality Challenges

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Cancer: The Survivorship and Inequality Challenges Professor Sir Mike Richards July 2010 Leeds

  2. Overview • The Coalition Government • Cancer: The Key Challenges • Focus on survivorship and inequalities

  3. Coalition Government: Priorities • A patient-led NHS: choice and information. ‘No decisions about me without me!’ • Better health outcomes: Focus on outcomes not process targets • Autonomy and accountability: GP Commissioning • Improved Public Health • Reforming long-term care

  4. Coalition Government and Cancer • Improving survival rates • Screening and early diagnosis • Improving patient experience • Survivorship • Cancer Drug Fund • Review of the Cancer Reform Strategy • Announced 6th July 2010 • To be completed by “Winter”

  5. Cancer: The Key Challenges • Rising incidence • Poor survival • High mortality • Increasing prevalence • Suboptimal quality of life of survivors • Inequalities • Slow diffusion of cost-effective new technologies • Managing overall expenditure in a cold financial climate

  6. Rising Incidence • Incidence of cancer is rising by about 1.5% pa. • This is largely due to demographics – i.e. an ageing population – but some specific cancers are rising much more rapidly (e.g. melanoma; oesophageal adenocarcinoma; HPV-related oral cancer and primary liver cancer) • Well over one half of all cancers could be prevented by adopting healthy lifestyles (not smoking; healthy diet/weight; physical activity; alcohol in moderation). • Specific opportunities: • HPV vaccination • Flexible sigmoidoscopy for colorectal cancer

  7. Poor Survival • Evidence from EUROCARE, CONCORD and more recent studies (e.g. Norway vs Sweden vs England) show poor survival rates in England across multiple cancers • One year survival is particularly poor – this is generally taken as a marker of late diagnosis • 10,000 avoidable deaths pa in England • This is the rationale for the National Awareness and Early Diagnosis Initiative (NAEDI) • Note: Survival is improving year on year for most cancers

  8. High Mortality • Mortality from cancer clearly reflects both incidence and survival rates • Cancer mortality in the UK (all ages) is worse than the EU average (EU15) and the gap has widened slightly over the past 10 years • Breast and lung cancer contribute heavily to the poor mortality observed in the UK • Mortality rates in the UK are falling well in people under 75, but poorly at older age.

  9. Increasing Prevalence • There are around 2 million people alive following a diagnosis of cancer in the UK (1.6 million in England) • Prevalence is rising by over 3% pa and is expected to reach 4 million by 2030 • Breast, colorectal and prostate cancers account for the largest numbers of survivors • Relatively little is known about the quality of life of cancer survivors • Cancer services are not well designed to meet the needs of survivors

  10. Inequalities and Cancer • There are multiple types of inequality relating to cancer: e.g. Inequalities in incidence, survival, mortality, early/late diagnosis, treatment and care • These inequalities impact differently on different groups e.g. by race, age, gender, disability, religion, sexual orientation and social deprivation. For example: • BME Groups are in general less likely to develop cancer, but there are notable exceptions – e.g. Prostate cancer; oral cancer; liver cancer • Men have a much higher incidence and mortality for almost all of the cancers which affect both sexes • Older people are much less likely to receive major surgery for cancer • Mortality is much higher in socially deprived groups

  11. Gender: Excess cancer in men

  12. Major resection rates by age

  13. Slow diffusion of new technologies • Diagnostics e.g. Late introduction of PET-CT Molecular Diagnostics? • Surgical Innovations e.g. Total Mesorectal Excision Sentinel node biopsy Laparoscopic colorectal surgery • Radiotherapy e.g. IMRT, IGRT • Systemic therapies

  14. Managing Overall Expenditure • Expenditure on Cancer in England is currently around £5bn (excluding prediagnosis costs and voluntary sector care) • Real terms increase over the past 4 years has been around 18% (cf 20% for all programme budget areas combined) • Drugs account for around 20% of total expenditure • Inpatient care is the largest single component - and is higher in the UK than elsewhere • We need to focus more on avoidable emergency admissions and shorter lengths of stay (e.g. acute oncology and Enhanced Recovery Programmes) • If we do this we can deliver substantial improvements in outcomes within the current financial envelope

  15. Survivorship: Five Shifts • Cultural shift – emphasis on health and well-being of survivors • Assessment and care planning – especially at the end of primary treatment and at transition points • Supported self management e.g. healthy lifestyles, work and finance. Better education on consequences of treatment • Tailored professional support • Linked to risks of recurrence, consequences, psychological well being etc • Patient choice not ‘one size fits all’ • E.g. Nurse led telephone follow up • Better measurement of outcomes • Patient experience • Patient reported outcomes and QOL

  16. Survivorship: Actions • Engaging with professionals and commissioners • Does the vision make sense? • Testing and evaluating new models of care • Adults and children/young people • NHS Improvement • Measurement • Patient experience of care survey in progress (cf 2000 and 2004) • Future: Patient reported outcome surveys (PROMs) • Resources and health economics • Patterns of care evaluation (registries and HES etc) • Health economics: New models vs. doing nothing

  17. Inequalities: Actions • The biggest risk is that we do nothing because it is too complex • The new focus on awareness and early diagnosis should reduce inequalities (e.g. for older people, BME groups) • MDTs have a major role in reducing inequalities. They need to ensure that all patients receive appropriate treatments. Recording of stage and frailty/comorbidity should be mandatory and should be demanded by commissioners • MDTs should be able to demonstrate equity of care. They should, for example, be able to benchmark their major resection rates against others

  18. Summary • Even though we have made a great deal of progress on cancer over the past 10-15 years, multiple challenges lie ahead • We can and we must tackle these even in a cold financial climate • Survivorship and inequalities are still very high priorities

More Related