1 / 11

An Update on FAA Fuel Tank Ullage Modeling

An Update on FAA Fuel Tank Ullage Modeling. William Cavage, Steven Summer, and Robert Ochs AAR-440 Fire Safety Branch Wm. J. Hughes Technical Center Federal Aviation Administration. International Systems Fire Protection Working Group CAA London, England UK April 19-20, 2006. Outline.

duaneevans
Download Presentation

An Update on FAA Fuel Tank Ullage Modeling

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. An Update on FAA Fuel Tank Ullage Modeling William Cavage, Steven Summer, and Robert Ochs AAR-440 Fire Safety BranchWm. J. Hughes Technical CenterFederal Aviation Administration International Systems Fire Protection Working Group CAA London, England UK April 19-20, 2006

  2. Outline • Background • Models Employed • Flight Test Results Comparison • Representative Flight Modeling AAR-440 Fire Safety R&D

  3. Background • FAA developed a proof of concept inerting system to inert the CWT of classic style Boeing model 747 • FAA intends to make a rule requiring flammability control of some or all CWTS with an emphasis on inerting system technologies • Fire Safety research has been working to expand modeling capabilities to allow for systems analysis, trade studies, etc. • Used lab research and flight test data to develop, expand, and validate a multiple bay fuel tank inerting model and an ullage flammability model • Performed analysis of a single fictitious flight to examine the SOA of our modeling capability • Developed a more typical 747 flight profile with a bigger OBIGGS than the NASA flight test system AAR-440 Fire Safety R&D

  4. Models Employed • Multiple bay inerting model same as model discussed in AIAA paper (see web site) with some small improvements • Tracks mass of oxygen in and out of each bay knowing NEA flow and given a set of generic flow splits between bays with no back pressure • Tracks mass of ullage knowing the change in density (given altitude changes) with no mass storage in tank • Model does these calculations in a time step process • Ullage flammability model is the evaporation/condensation model by Polymeropoulos & Ochs and discussed in Lisbon • Uses a generic fuel species model based on flash point developed by Sagebiel • Calculates the equilibrium state of the ullage given fuel temperature and then determines condensation effect from walls/ceiling in time AAR-440 Fire Safety R&D

  5. Results from Flight Test Comparison • Inerting model illustrated excellent agreement with measured flight test data with some exception • Good agreement is expected since a similar test was used to develop the bay to bay flow split ratios • Bay 4 trends look good but value is considerably off (the problem bay) • Resulting ullage average time values very consistent • Flammability model data trend results very good • Magnitude of data peaks and troughs illustrate significant deviation although measured data has some uncertainty so it is unclear how well the model duplicates flight test results • Models uses no empirical relationships to obtain results AAR-440 Fire Safety R&D

  6. Comparison of Flight Test Results with FAA Model AAR-440 Fire Safety R&D

  7. Comparison of Flight Test Results with FAA Model AAR-440 Fire Safety R&D

  8. Results – Representative Flight • Developed flight profile, OBIGGS performance, and temperature profile from existing flight test data taking into account a typical 747 flight profile • Difficult to determine precise temperature peaks and troughs but did best to approximate • OBIGGS was assumed to 33% bigger (1 more ASM) • Data trends as expected but very little we can do to validate the magnitude of the results • Regardless of peak oxygen concentration in single bay, tank remained nonflammable during entire flight • Tank flammability dropped below LEL during peak oxygen concentration rise in bay 1 AAR-440 Fire Safety R&D

  9. Input Data for 747 Modeling Exercise AAR-440 Fire Safety R&D

  10. Results of Modeling Exercise AAR-440 Fire Safety R&D

  11. Summary • Analysis of FAA Fire Safety model capabilities illustrates good fidelity for this single aircraft type • Remains to be seen how this work could translate to other multiple bay CWT aircraft types • Need additional work to be able to simulate different deposit and venting schemes • No additional modeling work planned to date AAR-440 Fire Safety R&D

More Related