1 / 22

JCSD Data Analysis

JCSD Data Analysis. Dr. Vashti K. Washington - Superintendent Dr. Arthur Lee Holmes – Chief of Academics Joyce Gerald – Director of Title I. Tale of Contents.

elana
Download Presentation

JCSD Data Analysis

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. JCSD Data Analysis Dr. Vashti K. Washington - Superintendent Dr. Arthur Lee Holmes – Chief of Academics Joyce Gerald – Director of Title I

  2. Tale of Contents

  3. Objectives:Performance Options 1 and 2The adjusted % proficient and advanced for the current year (option 1) or the adjusted % proficient and advanced over three years (option 2) is at least the percentage listed in the table. Percentages were computed after applying a standard error of measurement adjustment to the scores. Participation measurement adjustment to the scores. Participation AYP DATA - DISTRICT & ALL SCHOOLS AYP LEVELS THAT MUST BE MET THIS YEAR: the bar moved from: To:

  4. Percent Graduation Jasper - 2701000 - 2011 State Report Card - No Child Left Behind - Adequate Yearly Progress Percent Attendance Other IndicatorsThe district and state AYP determinations use both indicators.      1: Attendance Rate for Elem./Middle Schools, Districts, and the State         Current year must be at least 94.0%, or be at least .1 more than last year's rate.      2: Graduation Rate for High Schools        Current year must meet the GOAL of 88.3%, or the current year must meet the TARGET OBJECTIVE of 78.0%, or the current year is 2 percentage points higher than the previous year, or the current year is 2 percentage points higher than the most recent three-year average (including current year).

  5. 19

  6. Summary AYP 2011 - HES 15

  7. Summary AYP 2011 - RES 18

  8. Summary Percent Graduation AYP 2011 - HMHS

  9. Summary Percent Graduation AYP 2011 - RMS 16

  10. Summary Percent Graduation AYP 2011 - RHS 9

  11. PASS SCORES 3 YEAR STUDY BY GRADE LEVEL

  12. HES

  13. RES

  14. HMS 14

  15. RMS

  16. What progress have we made during the 2010-2011 school year? Measures of Academic Progress MAP SCORES; 2010-2011 SY

  17. Fall to Spring MAP Comparisons This should have column indicates what the grade level average should be at the end of the year. If it is not at that average at the end of the year the projection is that the grade level will not meet the standard on the state assessment. Also, note that the grade level did not begin the school year on grade level, but they made significant gains by the end of the year.

  18. Fall to Spring MAP Comparisons This should have column indicates what the grade level average should be at the end of the year. If it is not at that average at the end of the year the projection is that the grade level will not meet the standard on the state assessment. Also, note that the grade level did not begin the school year on grade level, but they made significant gains by the end of the year.

  19. Fall to Spring MAP Comparisons This should have column indicates what the grade level average should be at the end of the year. If it is not at that average at the end of the year the projection is that the grade level will not meet the standard on the state assessment. Also, note that the grade level did not begin the school year on grade level, but they made significant gains by the end of the year.

  20. Fall to Spring MAP Comparisons This should have column indicates what the grade level average should be at the end of the year. If it is not at that average at the end of the year the projection is that the grade level will not meet the standard on the state assessment. Also, note that the grade level did not begin the school year on grade level, but they made significant gains by the end of the year.

  21. Fall to winter MAP Comparisons This should have column indicates what the grade level average should be at the end of the year. If it is not at that average at the end of the year the projection is that the grade level will not meet the standard on the state assessment. Also, note that the grade level did not begin the school year on grade level, but they made significant gains by the end of the year.

  22. Fall to Winter MAP Comparisons This should have column indicates what the grade level average should be at the end of the year. If it is not at that average at the end of the year the projection is that the grade level will not meet the standard on the state assessment. Also, note that the grade level did not begin the school year on grade level, but they made significant gains by the end of the year.

More Related