1 / 35

QHE, ASM

QHE, ASM. Vincent Pasquier. Service de Physique Théorique C.E.A. Saclay France. From the Hall Effect to integrability. Hall effect. Annular algebras. deformed Hall effect and ASM. Most striking occurrence of a quantum macroscopic effect in the real word.

eldora
Download Presentation

QHE, ASM

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. QHE, ASM Vincent Pasquier Service de Physique Théorique C.E.A. Saclay France

  2. From the Hall Effect to integrability • Hall effect. • Annular algebras. • deformed Hall effect and ASM.

  3. Most striking occurrence of a quantum macroscopic effect in the real word • In presence of of a magnetic field, the conductivity is quantized to be a simple fraction up to • Important experimental fractions for electrons are: • Theorists believe for bosons: • Fraction called filling factor.

  4. Hall effect • Lowest Landau Level wave functions n=1,2, …,

  5. Number of available cells also the maximaldegree in each variable Is a basis of states for the system Labeled by partitions

  6. N-k particles in the orbital k are the occupation numbers Can be represented by a partition with N_0 particles in orbital 0, N_1 particles in orbital 1…N_k particles in orbital k….. There exists a partial order on partitions, the squeezing order

  7. Interactions translate into repulsionbetween particles. m universal measures the strength of the interactions. Competition between interactions which spread electrons apart and high compression which minimizes the degree n. Ground state is the minimal degree symmetric polynomial compatible with the repulsive interaction.

  8. Laughlin wave functionoccupation numbers: Keeping only the dominant weight of the expansion 1 particle at most into m orbitals (m=3 here).

  9. Important quantum numberwith a topological interpretation • Filling factor equal to number of particles per unit cell: Number of variables Degree of polynomial In the preceding case.

  10. Jack Polynomials: Jack polynomials are eigenstates of the Calogero-Sutherland Hamiltonian on a circle with 1/r^2 potential interaction.

  11. Jack polynomials at Feigin-Jimbo-Miwa-Mukhin Generateideal of polynomials“vanishing as the r power of the Distance between particles ( difference Between coordinates) as k+1 particles come together.

  12. Exclusion statistics: • No more than k particles into r consecutive orbitals. For example when k=r=2, the possible ground states (most dense packings) are given by: 20202020…. 11111111….. 02020202….. Filling factor is

  13. Moore Read (k=r=2) When 3 electrons are put together, the wave function vanishes as:

  14. . When 3 electrons are put together, the wave function vanishes as: x 1 2 x 1 y

  15. With adiabatic time QHE=TQFT One must consider the space P(x1,x2,x3|zi) of polynomials vanishing when zi-xj goes to 0. x2 x3 x1 Compute Feynman path integrals

  16. 2 1 4 3 Y 3

  17. Non symmetric polynomials • When additional degrees of freedom are present like spin, it is necessary to consider nonsymmetric polynomials. • A theory of nonsymmetric Jack polynomials exists with similar vanishing conditions.

  18. Two layer system. • Spin singlet projected system of 2 layers . When 3 electrons are put together, the wave function vanishes as:

  19. Exemples of wave functions • Haldane-Rezayi: singlet state for 2 layer system. When 3 electrons are put together, the wave function vanishes as: x 1 2 x 1 y

  20. RVB-BASIS Projection onto the singlet state - = Crossings forbidden to avoid double counting Planar diagrams. 5 6 2 3 1 4

  21. RVBbasis: Projection onto the singlet state

  22. q-deformation • RVB basis has a natural q-deformation known as the Kazhdan Lusztig basis. • Jack polynomials have a natural deformation Macdonald polynomials. • Evaluation at z=1 of Macdonald polynomials in the KL basis have mysterious positivity properties.

  23. e= e= 2

  24. Razumov Stroganov Conjectures I.K.Partition function: 6 1 5 2 4 3 Also eigenvector of: Stochastic matrix

  25. 1’ 2’ 1 e = 1 2 1 H= Stochastic matrix If d=1 Not hermitian

  26. Consider inhomogeneous transfer matrix: Transfer Matrix L= +

  27. Transfer Matrix Di Francesco Zinn-justin.

  28. Vector indices are patterns, entries are polynomials in z , …, z 1 n Bosonic condition

  29. T.L.( Lascoux Schutzenberger) e+τ projects onto polynomials divisible by: e Measures the Amplitude for 2 electrons to be In the same layer

  30. Two q-layer system. • Spin singlet projected system of 2 layers . (P) If i<j<k cyclically ordered, then Imposes for no new condition to occur

  31. Conjectures generalizing R.S. • Evaluation of these polynomials at z=1 have positiveinteger coefficients in d:

  32. Other generalizations • q-Haldane-Rezayi Generalized Wheel condition, Gaudin Determinant Related in some way to the Izergin-Korepin partition function? Fractional hall effect Flux ½ electron

  33. Moore-Read • Property (P) with s arbitrary. • Affine Hecke replaced by Birman-Wenzl-Murakami,. • R.S replaced by Nienhuis De Gier in the symmetric case.

  34. Conclusions • T.Q.F.T. realized on q-deformed wave functions of the Hall effect . • All connected to Razumov-Stroganov type conjectures. • Relations with works of Feigin, Jimbo,Miwa, Mukhin and Kasatani on polynomials obeying wheel condition. • Understand excited states (higher degree polynomials) of the Hall effect.

More Related