1 / 8

PC Report – TAC Meeting Arlington, Va. - May 2014

PC Report – TAC Meeting Arlington, Va. - May 2014. Mark Melanson - PC Coordinator Peter Hartwich - Deputy Tom McLaughlin - Deputy. PC Group Leadership Changes. Satoshi Nagano has resigned as Deputy due to “real” work commitments

elgin
Download Presentation

PC Report – TAC Meeting Arlington, Va. - May 2014

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. PC Report – TAC Meeting Arlington, Va. - May 2014 Mark Melanson - PC Coordinator Peter Hartwich - Deputy Tom McLaughlin - Deputy

  2. PC Group Leadership Changes • Satoshi Nagano has resigned as Deputy due to “real” work commitments • Dr. Tom McLaughlin from the Air Force Academy has joined as the new PC Group Deputy.

  3. PC Health Assessments are ongoing • Each PC reviewed individually • Participants are PC and Group leadership • Excellent conversations based upon content of questions • Great learning opportunity for leadership • Great opportunity to develop/discuss expectations for PC leadership • Generally last about one hour each • Well worth the time investment • Currently have completed 6 of 11 assessments (two new PCs not being reviewed, and Space Station is not viable)

  4. Results Summary Process • Assessment were done based upon a subjective scale • Green - Meets or Exceeds desired behavior • Yellow - Acceptable, but stronger effort could be done • Red - This is a concern item; needs work • Group leaders ratings were averaged per question • Questions were grouped (see next slide for details) into categories using QFD approach • Challenges • Interaction • Membership • Products • Purpose

  5. Summary Results (example from previous review) EXAMPLE ONLY Max value = 9 (3 reviewers x 3 points max) Three PC Reviews are incomplete

  6. Grouping of Questions in Topical Areas Added focus this year on contribution to integration tier!

  7. Space Station PC • Space Station PC is not viable • No leadership or activity • We have reached out to Sandy Magnus to help: • Determine a new rallying goal/objective for a potential reformation • Find potential leadership • If successful, we will attempt to re-launch the PC • Otherwise…..

More Related