1 / 15

Evaluation

Evaluation. Gaye Manwaring University of Dundee. Evaluation. When the cook tastes the food it is formative. When the guest tastes the food it is summative. Evaluation Cycle. Methods of data collection. Observation Interview Self-report forms Documentary analysis

elle
Download Presentation

Evaluation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Evaluation Gaye Manwaring University of Dundee

  2. Evaluation When the cook tastes the food it is formative. When the guest tastes the food it is summative.

  3. Evaluation Cycle

  4. Methods of data collection • Observation • Interview • Self-report forms • Documentary analysis • Participatory approaches quantitative and qualitative

  5. Participatory approaches • involve stakeholders • empower individuals • are creative, responsive and flexible • let participants choose topics, make recommendations and plan changes • need time, commitment and open minds • encourage collaboration, learning and organisational growth

  6. Participatory approaches • nominal group technique • round robin • traffic lights • aeroplane • head, heart, dustbin, carrier bag • quality/importance grids • what why plan

  7. Features Nominal Group Technique • participants generate the issues • identifies low level issues that concern many people • can be anonymous • may enhance negative feelings

  8. Features Round Robin • individual views • a measure of how representative they are • the lecturer could also join the group as a participant

  9. Features Traffic Lights • individual views • can track changes over time • visually attractive • can be used as a starting point for deeper discussions

  10. Features Aeroplane • very quick • anonymous • fun • snapshot view

  11. Features Head, Heart, Dustbin, Carrier Bag • cognitive and affective • positive and negative • very personal • looks forward for individual plans

  12. Features Quality Importance Grid • includes topics from participants and facilitators • identifies where to focus resources • participants discuss possible improvements and solutions

  13. Features What Why Plan • allows negatives to be turned round with ideas for improvement • uses group discussion • uses & values the experiences & expertise of the participants

  14. References Office of Evaluation and Strategic Planning (1997) Who Are the Question makers? A Participatory Evaluation Handbook. New York: United Nations Development Programme http://www.undp.org/eo/documents/who.htm Zukoski, A. and Luluquisen, M. (2002) Participatory Evaluation http://depts.washington.edu/ccph/pdf_files/Evaluation.pdf The Evaluation Trust, Reading http://www.evaluationtrust.org/tools/ Harvey, J. (1999) Evaluation Cookbook. Edinburgh: Learning Technology Dissemination Initiative http://www.icbl.hw.ac.uk/ltdi/cookbook

  15. References http://www.icbl.hw.ac.uk/ltdi/cookbook http://www.tla.ed.ac.uk/resources/ryt/ http://www.managementhelp.org/research/research.htm http://www.evaluationtrust.org http://www.undp.org/eo/documents/who.htm http://depts.washington.edu/ccph/pdf_files/Evaluation.pdf

More Related