1 / 42

Workshop on emissions of GHG from aviation and navigation

Workshop on emissions of GHG from aviation and navigation. Comparison of Eurocontrol/Eurostat and IEA estimates with MS inventories Anke Herold, ETC-ACC 18 May 2004. Total CO 2 emissions from aviation in 2000 Difference CRF to Eurocontrol/Eurostat.

elsu
Download Presentation

Workshop on emissions of GHG from aviation and navigation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Workshop on emissions of GHG from aviation and navigation Comparison of Eurocontrol/Eurostat and IEA estimates with MS inventories Anke Herold, ETC-ACC 18 May 2004

  2. Total CO2 emissions from aviation in 2000Difference CRF to Eurocontrol/Eurostat

  3. CO2 from domestic aviation in 2000 – difference CRF to Eurocontrol/Eurostat

  4. CO2 from international aviation in 2000 – difference CRF to Eurocontrol/Eurostat

  5. CO2 EF for jet kerosene

  6. Total CO2 emissions from aviation – influence of EF for difference CRF to Eurocontrol/Eurostat

  7. Austria: Comparison of CO2 emissions from Eurocontrol/Eurostat with CRF data

  8. Austria: Comparison of CO2 emissions from Eurocontrol/Eurostat with CRF data

  9. France: Comparison of CO2 emissions from Eurocontrol/Eurostat with CRF data

  10. France: Comparison of CO2 emissions from Eurocontrol/Eurostat with CRF data

  11. Sweden: Comparison of CO2 emissions from Eurocontrol/Eurostat with CRF data

  12. Sweden: Comparison of CO2 emissions from Eurocontrol/Eurostat with CRF data

  13. Sweden: description of national method used (NIR 2004) • SCAA calculates emissions from aviation based on statistics on the number of flights between city pairs (domestic and international), type of aircraft, amount of fuel needed for different flights and emissions per fuel on specific flights, based on data on aircraft performance during different phases of the flight and the distance between destinations. • SCAA also compares the data with information from Statistics Sweden on the delivered amount of fuel. Coherence between these two sources has been relatively good, the difference is between 2.9% and 14.6% during the period 1995-2002.

  14. Spain: Comparison of CO2 emissions from Eurocontrol/Eurostat with CRF data

  15. Spain: Comparison of CO2 emissions from Eurocontrol/Eurostat with CRF data

  16. Germany: Comparison of CO2 emissions from Eurocontrol/Eurostat with CRF data

  17. Germany: Comparison of CO2 emissions from Eurocontrol/Eurostat with CRF data

  18. Netherlands: Comparison of CO2 emissions from Eurocontrol/Eurostat with CRF data

  19. Netherlands: Comparison of CO2 emissions from Eurocontrol/Eurostat with CRF data

  20. Portugal: Comparison of CO2 emissions from Eurocontrol/Eurostat with CRF data

  21. Portugal: Comparison of CO2 emissions from Eurocontrol/Eurostat with CRF data

  22. Czech Republic: Comparison of CO2 emissions from Eurocontrol/Eurostat with CRF data

  23. Latvia: Comparison of CO2 emissions from Eurocontrol/Eurostat with CRF data

  24. Comparison of fuel consumption (TJ) between IEA and CRF data

  25. Conclusions • Estimation performed by Eurostat with Eurocontrol data is a very useful exercise, at least for verification purposes • Results should provide incentives to some MS to move to higher tier methods • Where results do not compare well, more methodological information is needed from Eurostat/Eurocontrol in order to enable MS to examine differences • With additional fuel consumption data from MS energy balances, additional analysis could be performed in order to assess underlying reasons for differences

  26. Thank you for your attention

  27. Belgium: Comparison of CO2 emissions from Eurocontrol/Eurostat with CRF data

  28. Belgium: Comparison of CO2 emissions from Eurocontrol/Eurostat with CRF data

  29. Denmark: Comparison of CO2 emissions from Eurocontrol/Eurostat with CRF data

  30. Denmark: Comparison of CO2 emissions from Eurocontrol/Eurostat with CRF data

  31. Finland: Comparison of CO2 emissions from Eurocontrol/Eurostat with CRF data

  32. Finland: Comparison of CO2 emissions from Eurocontrol/Eurostat with CRF data

  33. Greece: Comparison of CO2 emissions from Eurocontrol/Eurostat with CRF data

  34. Greece: Comparison of CO2 emissions from Eurocontrol/Eurostat with CRF data

  35. Ireland: Comparison of CO2 emissions from Eurocontrol/Eurostat with CRF data

  36. Ireland: Comparison of CO2 emissions from Eurocontrol/Eurostat with CRF data

  37. Italy: Comparison of CO2 emissions from Eurocontrol/Eurostat with CRF data

  38. Italy: Comparison of CO2 emissions from Eurocontrol/Eurostat with CRF data

  39. Sweden: Comparison of CO2 emissions from Eurocontrol/Eurostat with CRF data

  40. UK: Comparison of CO2 emissions from Eurocontrol/Eurostat with CRF data

  41. UK: Comparison of CO2 emissions from Eurocontrol/Eurostat with CRF data

  42. EU-15: Comparison of CO2 emissions from Eurocontrol/Eurostat with CRF data

More Related