180 likes | 325 Views
Project Tracking Update. July 12, 2011 MOPC. Project Tracking Tools (Historical). STEP List (Excel Spreadsheet) Engineers enter technical data and analysis on upgrades Used as a repository for all information on Transmission Upgrades Cumbersome and hard to update Historical record
E N D
Project Tracking Update July 12, 2011 MOPC
Project Tracking Tools (Historical) • STEP List (Excel Spreadsheet) • Engineers enter technical data and analysis on upgrades • Used as a repository for all information on Transmission Upgrades • Cumbersome and hard to update • Historical record • STEP list contains all upgrade information, even when project is completed or withdrawn
Project Tracking (New) • Project Tracking Database – Phase 1 • Upgrades tracked from NTC creation to rate recovery through the life of the Upgrade • Easier data retrieval • Quicker information response • Eliminates multiple data requests • No impacts to members in Phase 1 • Future phases of project • Member database access • Flexible communications for Transmission Owners and SPP
Project Tracking – Member Impact • No impact to members • Members will see no changes in their construction project interaction with SPP • SPP employees will gather project information and input into database same as today • Members have data that is more secure
ITP Status Update July 12, 2011 MOPC
2011 ITP10 Stakeholder Activities • TWG completed the Constraint Assessment • ESWG approved the resource plans for the two futures • Future 1 – Business as Usual • Future 2 – EPA Rules with Additional Wind: Adds additional wind generation and approximates the impact of EPA rulemaking by imposing retirements on small coal plants and a tax on carbon emissions • ESWG authorized calculation and utilization of metrics for ITP10
2011 ITP10 Stakeholder Activities • Metric Calculation • 9 metrics from ITP20 • Adjusted Production Cost • Value of Improved Available Transfer Capabilities • Reduced Losses • Impact on Losses Capacity • Levelization of LMP’s • Improved Competition in SPP Markets • Limited Export/Import Improvements • Reduction of Emission Rates and Values • Ability to Serve new Load
2011 ITP10 Stakeholder Activities • Metric Calculation • Two additional metrics calculated • Backstop to Catastrophic Events • Value of replacing previously approved projects
2011 ITP10 Completed Staff Activities • Model Development completed • Topology updates, baseline fuel costs, etc. • Quality Control • Stakeholder Review • dispatches • flowgate loadings • LMP prices • generator outages
2011 ITP10 Upcoming Activities • Identifying ITP10 potential violations • Reliability analysis of AC models with economic dispatches • Economic analysis of security-constrained economic dispatch models • List of Top 10 congested constraints will be compiled • ITP20 projects reviewed as potential ITP10 solutions • Staff developing strawman for incorporating seams projects
2011 ITPNT Activities • Identification of potential violations • Developed recommended plan for 100 kV and above upgrades • Recommended plan will be presented at upcoming SPP Summit • Developing recommended plan for below 100 kV
ITP Next Steps • July Planning Summit • Dallas, TX on July 21st • Discuss ITP10 potential violations (reliability, economic, and stability) • Start selecting ITP10 projects • Discuss ITPNT upgrades • Sub-Regional & Local Area Breakout Discussions • September Planning Summit
ITP Next Steps • October MOPC • Present draft solutions • 2011 ITP10 & ITPNT Draft Report • December Workshop • Tentative • January MOPC • Present final transmission plan • 2011 ITP10 & ITPNT Final Report • 2011 STEP Report
Generator Interconnection and Aggregate Study Process Internal review update
Background and Purpose • Background • General dissatisfaction expressed in customer satisfaction survey • Goals for Staff review • Understand concerns driving lower survey results • Staff performance? • Dissatisfaction with results? • Process? • Identify opportunities for improvement
Update • Common themes of feedback to-date • Length of time it takes to get through process and have certainty in requirements to approve requested service still too long • Impacts caused by shear volume of wind-related or other “speculative” requests on “ready to-go” projects • Lack of process to finalize third party impacts • Staff completing internal process review • Business process review • Tools • Resource requirements
Next Steps • Initiatives underway • SPP TSR Coordination with Third Party Systems • Third Party TSR Coordination with SPP • DPT Prescreen • Aggregate Study Withdrawal Costs • Staff complete internal review • Work with appropriate committees to assess potential process improvement proposals • ATP Business Practice
Katherine PrewittDirector, Planning501-614-3518kprewitt@spp.org Lanny NickellVice President, Engineering501-614-3232lnickell@spp.org