Download
1 / 2
20 likes | 22 Views
Strict financing standards and a bad credit score made you a sitting duck for dealers. However, this doesn't indicate you are stuck with high-interest rates for the rest of life. The 43rd United States President said that America is land of a second possibility. And, it certainly is.
E N D
Unidentified to almost everyone, there is something VERY different that occurs with your "Home loan Note" right away after closing. Your "Home mortgage Note" is backed and deposited in the bank, by the Loan provider, as a check and becomes "CASH"! The file that you just gave the bank or loan provider with your signature on it, that you think is a promise to pay them for money loaned to you, has actually simply been transformed to money in THEIR ACCOUNT. You simply provided the "loan provider" the exact dollar value of what they stated they just lent you! Who is the REAL lender in this 2nd "Secret Closing Deal"? Who actually lent who anything of value or any cash? You really just new fidelity funding yelp paid for your own home with your promissory "Mortgage Note" that you gave the bank and the bank offered you what in return? NOTHING!!! For any agreement to be legitimate there should be consideration offered by both celebrations. But do not they tell you that you must now pay back the "Loan" that they have made to you? Did you give them factor to consider or worth? Yes, your debt signature from your secret STRAWMAN account. How can it be that you could simply compose a "Note" and spend for your home? This leads us back to the personal bankruptcy of the United States in 1933. When FDR and Congress took all the residential or commercial property and gold from individuals in 1933 they needed to give something in return for that confiscation of residential or commercial property. What individuals got in return was the pledge that all of their needs would be fulfilled by the government, since the properties and the labor of individuals were collateral for the debt of the United States in the personal bankruptcy. All of their financial obligations would be "released" through "Notes", mainly Federal Reserve Notes. This was done without the approval of the people of America, much like the Internal Revenue Service Earnings Tax fraud, and this was an act of Treason by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt. The issue is available in where they never ever told us how we could achieve that discharge and have what we were entitled to after the insolvency. Why has this never ever been taught in the schools in the United States of America? Could it be that it would expose the biggest fraud in the history of this whole nation and on the planet? If the public is purposely not educated about specific things, then specific people and entities can take complete monetary advantage of essentially the whole population. Isn't this "selective education" more like "indoctrination"? Could this be what has happened? In Fina Supply, Inc. v. Abilene Nat. Bank, 726 S.W. 2d 537, 1987 it states "Celebration having exceptional understanding who takes advantage of another's lack of knowledge of the law to trick him by studied concealment or misrepresentation can be delegated that conduct." Does this mean that if there are people, home mortgage lenders and bankers with superior knowledge as a celebration in this "Loan Deal" that make the most of the "ignorance of the law", (through brainwashing) of the public to unjustly enhance themselves twofold and more, that they can be called to account? Can they be called to account in just a civil manner or exists a more serious accountability that falls under the classification of criminal
conduct? It is well established law that Scams vitiates (makes void) any contract that emerges from it. Is this deliberate "lack of disclosure" of the true nature of the agreement we have entered into is Scams and would make the mortgage contract void on its face? Could it be that the Fraud could actually be "studied concealment or misrepresentation" that makes those involved in the act accountable and responsible? What happens to the "Keep in mind" once it is transferred in the bank and is converted to "money"? Mortgage foreclosure attorneys state in court throughout this country that the "Note" was lost or misplaced and asks the Judge to take their word for it that they have the original note. How can they have your initial note when they cashed or transferred it into a savings account to never be spoken with again. They make copies of your note before it is deposited and they pawn these copies as the original note. The note when it is deposited into a bank account ends up being cash. Exist various kinds of cash? There is money of exchange and money of account. They are 2 very various things. Walker Todd explains in his expert witness affidavit that the banks actually do transform signatures into money. The definition of "cash" according to the Uniform Commercial Code: "Money" implies a circulating medium authorized or embraced by a domestic or foreign government and consists of a monetary system of account developed by an intergovernmental company or by arrangement in between two or more countries. Money can actually remain in different forms aside from what we are accustomed to believing. When you sign your name on a promissory note it ends up being cash whether you are talking a mortgage note or a charge card application! Did the bankers ever "reveal" this to us? Were we ever taught anything about this in the school system in this nation? Were future attorneys taught about this in law school? Could it be that this whole idea of having the ability to transform our signature to cash is a "studied concealment" or "misrepresentation" where those involved ended up being accountable if we are harmed by their actions? What takes place if you have signed a "Home loan Note" and already spent for your home at the 2nd, secret loan provider closing, and they come at a later date and foreclose and take it from you? Would you consider yourself to be harmed in any way?
