1 / 7

Housing for elderly people – cross-national differences and similarities

Housing for elderly people – cross-national differences and similarities. HSA Annual Conference 2012, University of York, Dr. Harald Stoeger, University of Linz, Austria. The topic area.

Download Presentation

Housing for elderly people – cross-national differences and similarities

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Housing for elderly people – cross-national differences and similarities HSA Annual Conference 2012, University of York, Dr. Harald Stoeger, University of Linz, Austria

  2. The topic area • Housing for elderly people: increasingly important topic area, perceived as a key common challenge of “ageing societies”. • It attracts interest from various academic disciplines (gerontology, health sciences, housing studies). • It is an increasingly salient issue for policy makers: hence it is vital to understand how different housing systems respond to it.

  3. The research approach • The research addresses how the old-age housing problem is framed in different country-specific settings. • Housing for elderly is an elusive and contested policy issue. • Discourse analysis: puts the emphasis on competing policy frames and narratives (“storylines” > Hajer) and their impacts of policy outcomes.

  4. The construction of the problem/solution • three competing discourses: • “institutional care” storyline: elderly people as frail, immobile, dependent; the housing issue is constructed in narrow terms, with emphasis on the relocation to “nursing homes”. • “independent living” storyline: elderly people as capable of living alone, but housing is seen as “unfit”: hence focus on barrier-free and “service integrated dwellings” + “smart homes”.

  5. The construction of the problem/solution • “Multigenerational communities”: elderly as active, choice-oriented, interested in social connectedness and participation; • Housing is seen as a contributor to multigenerational communities; adequate housing can promote communication, social relationships, support etc. • Emphasis is put on better cooperation between different policy realms and on direct participation

  6. Policy effects • “institutional care”: public investments in new nursing homes offering high quality institutional care, in both Germany and Austria. • “independent living”: public funding for improving the “fitness” of the housing stock. • “multigenerational communities”: special neighbourhood development programmes in Germany, with a focus on the role of housing for promoting multigenerational communities.

  7. Conclusions • Competing frames/discursive storylines that inform policy outcomes to a varying extent. • Growing emphasis on the comprehensive idea of multigenerational communities, with housing as a (key) factor. • Integration of widely disconnected policy realms and actors, participation of residents. • Mind the constraints! (shrinking funding, lack of interest of local authorities, housing providers etc.)

More Related