1 / 22

A History of the Juvenile Justice System

A History of the Juvenile Justice System. The Nutshell Version, Anyhow. Two Central Issues. Why should kids who commit crimes be treated any differently than adults? At what age should a child be held criminally responsible for their actions? At what age does a kid cease to become a “kid?”

etana
Download Presentation

A History of the Juvenile Justice System

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A History of the Juvenile Justice System The Nutshell Version, Anyhow

  2. Two Central Issues • Why should kids who commit crimes be treated any differently than adults? • At what age should a child be held criminally responsible for their actions? • At what age does a kid cease to become a “kid?” • If kids should be treated differently, how should they be treated?

  3. Pre-Middle Ages • Code of Hammurabi (2270 b.c.) • Other Examples • Roman civil and church law • Ancient Jewish and Moslem laws

  4. Middle Ages (500-1500ad) • Roman criminal law codified in the “Twelve Tables” • Eventually, under the “Justinian Code” • 0-7 Years = not criminally responsible • 7-12/14 = know right from wrong? • >12/14 = adult • English common law emerges (1000-1100ad) • Early common law = “too young for punishment” • By 1500s, common law adopts scheme similar to Justinian code

  5. Middle Ages II • English Common Law • 0 to 7 = not criminally responsible • 7-14 = burden on state to demonstrate that the child: • Formed criminal intent • Understood consequences of their actions • Knew right from wrong • Concept of Parens Patriae develops • Civil law, King as “parent of country”

  6. England 1500-1700 • Statute of Artificers (1562) and Poor Laws (1602) • Children of paupers apprenticed • Punishment of criminal children still similar to adults • Corporal/public, banishment, galley slavery • Bridewell Workhouse (London, 1557) • Precursor to prisons, idea = “reform through labor” • Mostly for “idle”/”disorderly”

  7. Colonial America • Until the late 1700sEnglish Common Law • Prison uncommon, many children found “innocent” to spare them corporal punishment

  8. U.S. 1775-1825 • The Industrial Revolution • The Birth of the Penitentiary • “Gentleman Reformers” Result of these trends: Houses of Refuge • Ex Parte Crouse (1839) And later, “Industrial” and “Reform” schools • People ex rel. O’Connell V. Turner (1870)

  9. The “Child Saving Movement” • Child Savers disgruntled with “child prisons” • Deep mistrust of “the city” and immigrants • Advocated rural “Cottage Style” housing • Helped to “place out” city kids to farm families

  10. Progressive Era (1900-1930) • The Progressives • Optimists + Faith in Government • General = sanitation, poverty, unsafe labor… • Juveniles = compulsory education, helped shape juvenile justice system

  11. The Juvenile Court Movement • First Juvenile Court in Illinois (1899) • Quasi-civil nature of court • Parens Patriae = act in best interest of child using non-criminal procedures • No “special wrong” necessary • Characteristics • Informal, closed proceedings with sealed records • Medical model of “diagnosing” social ills • Age = 15 years and younger • Probation Officers to investigate and rehabilitate

  12. J.C. Spreads (1900-1950)

  13. Innovation and Stability • Juvenile Courts Spread, but differences emerged • Some states require procedures similar to criminal court, others courts grant judge complete discretion to “follow conscience” • Discretion/Informality becomes key issue • Good? • Bad? • By the 1950s, many juvenile courts are “bureaucratic and burdened”

  14. Winds of Change 1960-1975 • Social Context of this Period Crucial • Viet Nam, Kent State, Attica, Watergate… • Increase in crime, divorce, single parents… • Youth flaunting morals of prior generation • Ideological Responses • Conservatives? • Liberals/Progressives?

  15. Strange Bedfellows • Conservatives and Liberals largely agree on policy Issues • In both adult and juvenile system, discretion should be limited • Juveniles should be granted due process rights • Differences? • Conservatives  treat juveniles more like adults, punishment works • Liberals  most juveniles should be diverted from the system, short sentences for those that aren’t

  16. Constitutional Domestication • Kent vs. United States (1961) • In Re Gault (1967) • In Re Winship (1970) • Breed v. Jones (1975) • Justice Stewarts Dissent Opinion in Gault

  17. From Cox et. al (Your Book) • “Legalists” • “Case Workers” (Social Work)

  18. OJJDP and DSO • 1967 President Johnson’s “Commission on Law Enforcement and Administration of Justice.” • 1974 Congress enacts “Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act.” • Creation of OJJDP • Decriminalization, Deinstitutionalization, elimination of court authority over status offenders • Mass. “deinstitutionalization” experiment

  19. Getting “Tough” 1980-2000 • Backlash against diversion, labeling theory • Political Rhetoric “get tough on juveniles” • National “war on drugs” • 1984 National Advisory Committee for Juvenile Justice Delinquency and Prevention

  20. How have we gotten “tough?” • Legislative Policy • Juvenile Wavier, Statutory Exclusion • Lower upper age limit of jurisdiction • Sentencing (Blended, mandatory minimum) • Confidentiality, records in adult courts • Types of Punishment • Boot Camps, ISP, Electronic Monitoring

  21. Where is policy now • Crime in general is not “high profile” issue • OJJDP 1993 Comprehensive Strategy • Barry Feld’s “Criminological triage”

  22. Research For Debates and Papers • I Expect evidence from academic sources • Journal articles, academic books • Searching for articles/books • Get references from books or articles • Government reports (OJJDP, NCJRS…) • Search • Criminal Justice Abstracts • Sage journals search (full text) • Journal of Crime and Delinquency (full text)

More Related