1 / 25

The experiences of applying a sustainability assessment model

The experiences of applying a sustainability assessment model. JE Cavanagh, B Frame, M Fraser*, J Gabe Landcare Research, *Victoria University. What is the sustainability assessment model (SAM)?. A tool….. for engaging sustainable development thinking within organisations

ethelda
Download Presentation

The experiences of applying a sustainability assessment model

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The experiences of applying a sustainability assessment model JE Cavanagh, B Frame, M Fraser*, J Gabe Landcare Research, *Victoria University

  2. What is the sustainability assessment model (SAM)? A tool….. • for engaging sustainable development thinking within organisations • for modelling and evaluating sustainable development profiles of ‘projects’ • aims to maximise sustainability for a given project by…….

  3. Developing a profile…. Total turnover or total cost Social benefit of product/service Benefits via taxation Social benefit of jobs Resources used Pollution impacts +ve -ve Social Environmental Resource Economic

  4. Development of the profile…. • Requires active participation from stakeholders • Is a learning process • Allows consideration of the impact of different measures, therefore options for improved sustainability • Provides a mechanism to engage wider stakeholder groups

  5. Aim of work • Investigate the application of SAM across a range of sectors and case studies • Waste • Organic waste • Options for recycling • Transport • Housing

  6. Organic waste • Disposal of organic waste via traditional means vs usage in a community garden

  7. Community garden

  8. Outcomes • Local council opted to retain land currently used as a community garden, as opposed to using it for social housing

  9. Case study – waste management options • Assessment of waste disposal vs resource recovery • Disposal to landfill • Small-scale community based recycling • Commercial-scale community based recycling • Commercial recycling operation • Collection of materials

  10. Landfill Taxes Operational costs Social benefit of taxes Capital costs Human capital Air emissions Direct and indirect jobs Environmental spending Footprint Infrastructure

  11. Small-scale community based recycling operation Additional benefits Social spending Direct and indirect jobs Operational costs Human capital Infrastructure

  12. Commercial-scale community based recycling operation Taxes Social spending Operational costs Additional benefits Social benefit of taxes Human capital Direct and indirect jobs Infrastructure

  13. Outcomes • Purpose of case study was to initiate discussion around the relative economic, social and environmental impacts and benefits of alternative waste management options • Achieved this aim, but no ‘action’ taken • Limitations: didn’t include the wider impacts of recovering materials

  14. Vehicle operating costs Air emissions Fuel use Water quality impacts Case study - transport • Assessment of do-nothing vs implementation of bus priority lanes

  15. Travel Time savings Vehicle operating costs Air emissions Fuel use Water quality impacts

  16. Outcomes • Primary ‘benefit’ of bus-lane is anticipated travel-time savings • Minor resource and environmental benefits • Further work continuing

  17. Housing case studies • Housing developer • Large-scale development (~2500 units) • Sustainability framework used in preliminary design • Housing New Zealand Corporation • 6 units, pilot study for use in asset decision-making • Currently developing SAM profiles

  18. Items for inclusion….. • Economic category - broadly represents contribution to GDP, as money going into society • Project costs • Local businesses (include local employment) • Household operation • Environmental and Resource category • Land area used • Household electricity use, waste disposal • Transport (fuel, air emissions) • Water use and sewage impacts • Ecological impacts

  19. Examples cont….. • Social category • Typical indicators focus on aspects such as accessibility to services, social inclusion, quality of life • Tangible outcomes • improved mental and physical health (well-being) • reduced crime/social dysfunction • Participation in community activities (time spent volunteering)

  20. Experiences • Key step is defining the project scope • items for inclusion • Feasibility of including those items • Different levels of participation from stakeholders • Often desired to be used to ‘prove’ a particular option is the best option • Researcher often viewed as providing the ‘right’ answer

  21. Experiences cont. • Monetisation • Different stakeholder views on the ‘value’ of monetisation • Approach is use credible valuation sources, where possible • Surrogate valuations may also be used – stakeholder participation vital • Non-monetised items can also be included

  22. Experiences cont… • Technical challenges • Data provision/confidentiality issues • Valuation

  23. Conclusions • SAM has not been used to full potential to date • SAM can be a useful tool to incorporate wider impacts (social, environmental, resource) in project decision-making • Depends on the decision-making environment the project leader operates in

  24. Acknowledgements • Thanks to Environment Waikato, Xtreme Waste, Hamilton City Council, Fullcircle Carter Holt Harvey, Wastebusters Trust Canterbury, TerraNova, Christchurch City Council, Housing New Zealand Corporation

More Related