1 / 84

From Knowledge Representation to Reality Representation

From Knowledge Representation to Reality Representation. Barry Smith. 2002. Institute for Formal Ontology and Medical Information Science (Germany) initially: work on formal ontology and on ontology-based quality control in medical terminologies (UMLS, SNOMED, NCI Thesaurus, etc.).

farhani
Download Presentation

From Knowledge Representation to Reality Representation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. From Knowledge Representation to Reality Representation Barry Smith http://ontologist.com

  2. 2002 • Institute for Formal Ontology and Medical Information Science (Germany) • initially: work on formal ontology • and on ontology-based quality control in medical terminologies • (UMLS, SNOMED, NCI Thesaurus, etc.) http://ontologist.com

  3. Problem: Associative approach to word meanings SimilarTo Fruit Vegetable NarrowerThan Orange Apfelsine SynonymWith Goble & Shadbolt http://ontologist.com

  4. both testes is_a testis • plant leaves is_a plant • menopause part_of death • bacterium causes experimental model of disease • not normal cell is_a cell • not abnormal cell is_a cell http://ontologist.com

  5. move from associative relations between meanings to ontological relations between the entities themselves • supplementing data mining approaches with • better data • better annotations • better integration • the possibility of strong logical reasoning http://ontologist.com

  6. First crack in the wall • Digital Anatomist Foundational Model of Anatomy(Department of Biological Structure, University of Washington, Seattle) • Virtual Soldier Project: • Reference Ontology of Anatomy • Reference Ontology of Physiology • Reference Ontology of Disease Pathways http://ontologist.com

  7. Second Crack in the Wall • Gene Ontology Consortium Open Biological Ontologies http://ontologist.com

  8. NCOR: National Center for Ontological Research • Buffalo Center of Excellence in Bioinformatics) • Stanford Medical Informatics (Protégé 2000) • Berkeley Drosophila Genome Project • (Model Organism Phenotype Ontology Project) http://ontologist.com

  9. NCOR: National Center for Ontological Research • plus industrial parners • Ontology Works • ... http://ontologist.com

  10. NCOR Methodology • work with content developers to ensure rigorous conformity with good principles of classification and definition • use formally defined categories and relations to ensure interoperability and support automatic reasoning • and to move beyond mere statistical / associative techniques http://ontologist.com

  11. Goal in Biomedical Informatics • use the methodology of formally defined relations and a common top-level ontology to bridge the granularity gap between genomics and proteomics data and phenotype (clinical, pharmacological, patient centered) data • From molecules to diseases http://ontologist.com

  12. Examples of simple formal-ontological structures • is_a hierarchies • part_of hierarchies • dependence relations http://ontologist.com

  13. A Window on Reality http://ontologist.com

  14. Medical Diagnostic Hierarchy a hierarchy in the realm of diseases http://ontologist.com

  15. Dependence Relations Organisms Diseases http://ontologist.com

  16. A Window on Reality Organisms Diseases http://ontologist.com

  17. Organ Part Organ Subdivision Anatomical Space Anatomical Structure Organ Cavity Subdivision Organ Cavity Organ is_a Organ Component Serous Sac Tissue Serous Sac Cavity Subdivision Serous Sac Cavity Pleural Sac Pleura(Wall of Sac) Pleural Cavity part_of Parietal Pleura Visceral Pleura Interlobar recess Mediastinal Pleura Mesothelium of Pleura http://ontologist.com

  18. A Window on Reality http://ontologist.com

  19. We can reason across such hierarchies and combinations • but only if the top-level categories and associated formal-ontological relations are well-defined and used consistently http://ontologist.com

  20. Formal-Ontological Categories http://ontologist.com

  21. Formal-Ontological Relations http://ontologist.com

  22. To support integration of ontologies • relational expressions such as • is_a • part_of • ... • should be used in the same way by all the ontologies to be integrated • NCOR goal http://ontologist.com

  23. to define these relations properly • we need to take account of reality • If we remain in the realm of concepts we will forever face problems of interoperability http://ontologist.com

  24. to define these relations properly • we need to take account not of concepts, • but of universals and instances in reality http://ontologist.com

  25. Tom Gruber • “An ontology is a specification of a conceptualization” http://ontologist.com

  26. The Concept Orientation • Work on biomedical ontologies grew out of work on medical dictionaries and thesauri • led to the assumption that all that need be said about concepts can be said without appeal to time or instances. • & fostered an impoverished regime of definitions http://ontologist.com

  27. ‘Concept’ in ontology runs together: • the meaning that is shared in common by a collection of synonymous terms • an idea shared in common in the minds of those who use synonymous terms (psycho-linguistic view) • a universal, feature or property shared by entities in the world which fall under the concept http://ontologist.com

  28. Problem of evaluation • if an ontology is a mere “specification of a conceptualization,” then the distinction between good and bad ontologies loses its foothold in reality http://ontologist.com

  29. There are more word meanings than there are types of entities in reality • unicorn • devil • cancelled performance • avoided meeting • prevented pregnancy • imagined mammal ... http://ontologist.com

  30. A is_a B =def. • ‘A’ is more specific in meaning than ‘B’ http://ontologist.com

  31. unicorn is_a one-horned mammal • alien implant removal is_a surgical process • Chios energy healing is_a therapeutic process http://ontologist.com

  32. This linguistic reading • yields a more or less coherent reading of relations like: • ‘is_a’ • ‘synonymous_with’ • ‘associated_to’ http://ontologist.com

  33. but it fails miserably when it comes to relations of other types • part_of = def. composes, with one or more other physical units, some larger whole • contains =def. is the receptacle for fluids or other substances. http://ontologist.com

  34. for how can concepts, on the linguistic reading, figure as relata of relations like: • part_of • adjacent_to • connected_to http://ontologist.com

  35. connected_to =def. Directly attached to another physical unit as tendons are connected to muscles. • How can a meaning or concept be directly attached to another physical unit as tendons are connected to muscles ? http://ontologist.com

  36. is_a • human is_a mammal • all instances of the universal human are as a matter of necessity instances of the universal mammal http://ontologist.com

  37. Evaluation • Good ontologies are those whose general terms correspond to universals in reality, and thereby also to corresponding instances. http://ontologist.com

  38. Kinds of relations • <universal, universal>: is_a, part_of, ... • <instance, universal>: this explosion instance_of the universal explosion • <instance, instance>: Mary’s heart part_of Mary http://ontologist.com

  39. Instance-level relations • part_of • is_located_at • has_participant • has_agent • earlier • . . . http://ontologist.com

  40. part_of • For instances: • part_of= instance-level parthood • (for example between Mary and her heart) • For universals: • A part_of B =def. given any instance a of A there is some instance b of B such that a part_of b http://ontologist.com

  41. C1 C c att c att1 transformation_of http://ontologist.com

  42. transformation_of • fetus transformation_of embryo • adult transformation_of child • C2 transformation_of C1 =def. any instance of C2 was at some earlier time an instance of C1 http://ontologist.com

  43. derives_from • c derives_from c1 • =def c and c1 are non-identical • and exist in continuous succession http://ontologist.com

  44. the initial component ceases to exist with the formation of the new component C c att C1 c1att1 the new component detaches itself from the initial component, which itself continues to exist C c att c att1 C1 c1att http://ontologist.com

  45. two initial components fuse to form a new component C1 c1att1 C c att C' c' att http://ontologist.com

  46. Functions • your heart has the function: to pump blood • = your heart is predisposed (has the potential or casual power) to realize a process of the type pumping blood. • has_agent (instance-level relation) • p is_functioning_of cp has_agent c http://ontologist.com

  47. Example: Spatially Coinciding Objectswith thanks to Maureen Donnelly http://ontologist.com

  48. Two entities coincide (partially) when they overlap (share parts) • my hand coincides with my body • the European Union coincides with the British Commonwealth • (United Kingdom … Malta, Cyprus) http://ontologist.com

  49. Some entities coincide even though they share no parts • any material object coincides with its spatial region • a portion of food coincides with my stomach cavity http://ontologist.com

  50. Holes may coincide with material objects • The hole in the chunk of amber coincides completely with, but does not overlap, the encapsulated insect which fills it • Sometimes holes and objects are moving independently (a bullet flying through a railway carriage moving through a tunnel) http://ontologist.com

More Related