1 / 14

LELA 10082

LELA 10082. Describing accents IV Case study: Liverpool. Liverpool accent. Spoken in quite restricted area around city, though influences accents (due to migration!) as “far” away as Southport, Warrington, Chester/North Wales. Liverpool accent.

faulknerb
Download Presentation

LELA 10082

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. LELA 10082 Describing accents IV Case study: Liverpool

  2. Liverpool accent Spoken in quite restricted area around city, though influences accents (due to migration!) as “far” away as Southport, Warrington, Chester/North Wales

  3. Liverpool accent • Northern accent with no /~/ distinction, and typical /a~A/ distribution • But quite unlike other local accents (rural Lancs, Cheshire) in other respects: close /i/ in city, diphthongs for /ei,ou/ • Said to derive from C19 migration of Manx, Scots, Welsh and above all Irish – certainly there are Gaelic features in the accent • Amazingly, ignored in 1950-61 Survey of English Dialects • Actually (like most accents) there are numerous varieties, in particular “hard, gritty” vs “soft, lyrical” • Distinctive intonation range (though more marked in recent years)

  4. Most distinctive feature • “Lenition” of stop consonants • Realisation as fricatives or affricates of /t/ and /k/ especially, and to an extent /p/ • General “lax” articulation of voiced stop consonants /b,d,g/

  5. Endocentric analysis of /t/ phoneme(strongest accent) • If realised as [s], forms homophone pairs • sin/tin, lesser/letter, pass/pat, sri/tree, sop/stop, rice/rights, chance/chant • Word-finally may be realised as [h] • but [bUh], what [wh] • But this is allophonic free variation, as [bUs] and [ws] are also possible • And existence of /h/ phoneme is in doubt • Similar situation with medial: • Got a letter may be [gsəlEsə], [gəlEə] • This may be incidental variation, ie using /r/ phoneme • Similar situation with lateral and nasal release: • button, bottle more likely to be heard with [?] or [s] • Glottalstop otherwise not particularly common feature

  6. Arguments against • Many accents do make a distinction, even if /t/ is heavily affricated • Native intuition would recognize difference • Though this is influenced by familiarity with RP and other accents • And reinforced by the writing system • In fact, may not even agree that eg but/bus are homophones • Distribution of allophones can be described with reference to “t in the spelling”: • final [h] in but, what (but never in bus) • medial ‘r’ sound in got to, lot of, better (but never in passer, guesser) • Glottal stop in bottle (but never in castle)

  7. Word list

  8. Narrative text • Speaker • Female • “middle-aged” • has lived in Liverpool all her life • You can also hear one or two other speakers • At least one of these is also Liverpudlian

  9. Things to listen out for • Affricated stops: • [x] in America, weeks (0:00), like (0:09), Walker (0:12), can’t drink, can’t smoke (0:18), walking (0:18), working (0:38), work (0:47), back (0:59) etc • [s] in great (0:16), monitor (0:28), straight [sreIs] (0:38), extra [Exsr] (1:18) • Realisation of /r/: • flap medially America (0:00); for her (0:37), for him (0:59), where it (1:08); • tap or roll in great (0:16), drink (0:18), straight (0:38) • Medial /t/ realised as tap: what if (0:33), lot of (1:08), got a job (1:15), tara (1:38) (= ta-ta) • /h/ usually dropped: her (0:16), he’s (0:28), him (0:59)

  10. Accents: Summary • When comparing English accents, it is usual (and easiest) to compare with RP • Often there are a few very striking features which we tend to focus on, but in reality there are probably lots of others, sometimes quite subtle • Notice we have tried to use phonetic terminology, and avoid subjective comments about attractiveness or otherwise of accents

  11. Realisation of // vowel /a/ ~ /A/ distribution Distribution of /r/ (“rhotic” accents) /u/ ~ /U/ distinction /h/ phoneme (“H dropping”) Use of glottal stop Status of velar nasal /N/ Use of /j/ in consonant clusters “Long mid diphthonging” Regional accents in general:Key points of variation

  12. Distribution and phoneme status of velar nasal /N/ • Pronunciation of words ending in -ing • [N] as an allophone of /n/ • “Long mid diphthonging” • Variety in quality of diphthongs /ei/ and /ou/ • More southern accents have wider diphthongs • Some accents have (historically older) monophthongs

  13. Accent groups of the British Isles

  14. CL: Central Lancs CN: Central north ESW: Eastern southwest H: Humberside M: Merseyside NE: North-east SM: South Midlands WM: West Midlands WSW: Western southwest Source: A. Hughes, P. Trudgill and D. Watt. English Accents and Dialects: An introduction to social and regional varieties of English in the British Isles. (4th edition) London (2005) Hodder Arnold

More Related