1 / 8

INC Report to the NANC September 24, 2002 David Bench - INC Moderator

INC Report to the NANC September 24, 2002 David Bench - INC Moderator Dana Smith - INC Assistant Moderator. INC MEETINGS. September 9-13, 2002: Providence, RI November 4-8, 2002: Washington, DC January 7-10, 2003: Washington, DC All meeting information can be found at:

feng
Download Presentation

INC Report to the NANC September 24, 2002 David Bench - INC Moderator

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. INC Report to the NANCSeptember 24, 2002David Bench - INC Moderator Dana Smith - INC Assistant Moderator

  2. INC MEETINGS • September 9-13, 2002: Providence, RI • November 4-8, 2002: Washington, DC • January 7-10, 2003: Washington, DC • All meeting information can be found at: www.atis.org/atis/clc/inc/inccal.htm

  3. LNPA Workshop • At the request of the LNPA WG, INC updated guidelines to accommodate wireless Type 1 to Type 2 block transfers • To accommodate wireless pooling, INC updated guidelines that alters the block activation interval. PAS will have to be modified and INC supports such modification...depending on the price tag J

  4. LNPA WorkshopBlock Forecasting • There is a disconnect between the intent of the INC guidelines and the design of PAS • PAS was built to reject a block application if the blocks requested exceed the forecast for that month…even if only by one block • The guidelines allow SPs to be assigned incremental blocks if available in the pool, but PAS does not allow the assignment of incremental blocks unless the SP modifies its forecast “on the spot” • SPs believe that PAS should have been built with flexibility to accommodate forecast estimates within a fluid six-month window

  5. Forecasting Example & Recommendation SP six-month forecast equals total of 10 blocks over six months Recommendation: INC requests that the NANC recommend to the FCC that the PAS be modified to accommodate forecast estimates within a fluid six-month window

  6. CO/NXX Workshop • To address the concerns expressed by state PUCs, INC revised its guideline text on deadlines for code assignment prior to pool start dates. • Special appreciation to Christine Sealock Kelly (New York) for her thoughtful input and participation on behalf of the states.

  7. Committee Issue Summary

  8. RELEVANT INC WEB SITES • INC Homepage: http://www.atis.org/atis/clc/inc/inchom.htm • INC Calendar: http://www.atis.org/atis/clc/inc/inccal.htm • INC Issues: http://www.atis.org/atis/clc/inc/incissue.htm • INC Meeting Records: http://www.atis.org/atis/clc/inc/incmtgrc.htm • INC Published Documents: http://www.atis.org/atis/clc/inc/incdocs.htm

More Related