1 / 15

DVCS on the Proton and Nuclei in an Electron- Ion Collider Recent EIC white papers : arXiv:1212.1701 arXiv:1209.0757

DVCS on the Proton and Nuclei in an Electron- Ion Collider Recent EIC white papers : arXiv:1212.1701 arXiv:1209.0757. C. Hyde Old Dominion University. APS April Meeting 13-16 April 2013 Denver CO. e+p e+p+ g. Generalized Parton Distributions (GPDs). GPD ( x, x ,t ) x ≈ x B /(2-x B )

fran
Download Presentation

DVCS on the Proton and Nuclei in an Electron- Ion Collider Recent EIC white papers : arXiv:1212.1701 arXiv:1209.0757

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. DVCS on the Proton and Nuclei in an Electron-Ion ColliderRecent EIC white papers:arXiv:1212.1701arXiv:1209.0757 C. Hyde Old Dominion University APS April Meeting 13-16 April 2013 Denver CO e+pe+p+g

  2. Generalized Parton Distributions (GPDs) • GPD(x,x,t) • x ≈ xB/(2-xB) • x = average momentum fraction • 2x = skewness • Correlation of longitudinal momentum fraction x±x with transverse spatial distributions • Impact parameter bFourier congugateD, with D2= t = (q-q’)2 • GPD DISElastic ElectroWeak • H(x,x,t): H(x,0,0)=q(x)  • E(x,x,t) : No forward link to DIS

  3. DVCS in an Electron Ion Collider • Higher CM Energy than JLab fixed target • Larger Q2, xBjrange • Higher Luminosity (and CM Energy) than COMPASS • Longitudinally and Transversely polarized beams without dilution • Roughly equivalent to factor of 10 in luminosity • Spectator tagging to zero relative momentum • Neutron structure from D, 3He beams • Calibration check of bound proton structure via tagging of spectator neutrons. • Tagging of far-forward coherent nuclear recoil • e + AZ  e + AZ+ g • Extensions to r, w, f, J/y

  4. Ultra-forward hadron detection – summary • Neutron detection in a 25 mrad cone down to zero degrees • Excellent acceptance for all ion fragments • Recoil baryon acceptance: • up to 99.5% of beam energy for all angles • down to 2-3 mrad for all momenta • Momentum resolution < 3x10-4 • limited by intrinsic beam momentum spread n • 100 GeV maximum ion energy allows using large-aperture magnets with achievable field strengths p e n 20 Tm dipole p 2 Tm dipole solenoid e

  5. DVCS & Spatial imaging with EIC • arXiv:1212.1701 • DVCS cross section • Transverse spatial image 10 days MEIC Phase I

  6. Coherent Nuclear DVCS in JLab MEIC design • Luminosity LA~Lp/Z • Coherent peak: dsA(t=0) ~ Z2dsp • Counting rate in coherent peak : LAdsA(t=0) ~ ZLpdsp • Coherent peak drops very rapidly with t • What is our resolution for resolving the diffractive shape of nuclei? • Ion Beam, PA = Z P0 • rms beam spread at IP: • dP||/P = 3•10–4 • dPperp/P = 2•10–4

  7. Coherent DVCS scaling to Charge Form Factors • dsDVCS ~ |F(D2)|2 • D2 = (q-q’)2 = (P’-P)2 • ConstrainD2from both (k-k’-q’)2 and (P’-P)2 • Resolution from ion tagging alone: • Dominated by beam angular spread at IP • dD ~ dP ~ 2•10–4 P • ±1s resolution bands for 12C @ PC= 6•60 GeV/c

  8. Outlook • Resolving the diffraction pattern of coherent DVCS on light nuclei is possible. • More refined studies of dual constraint of momentum transfer resolution from both (k-k’-q’)2 and (P’-P)2 in progress. • Short runs at relaxed b* ~ Zb0*can improve resolution of momentum transfer by factor Z • This also reduces luminosity by factor of Z, • At coherent peak, counting rate on nucleus AZ still ~ rate on proton(at full luminosity).

  9. EIC – staging at BNL and JLab Stage I Stage II eRHIC @ BNL √s = 34 – 71 GeV Ee = 3 – 5 (10 ?) GeV Ep = 100 – 255 GeV EPb = up to 100 GeV/A √s = up to ~180 GeV Ee = up to ~30 GeV Ep = up to 275 GeV EPb = up to 110 GeV/A MEIC / EIC @ JLab √s = up to ~140 GeV Ee = up to 20 GeV Ep = up to at least 250 GeV EPb = up to at least 100 GeV/A √s = 13 – 70 GeV Ee = 3 – 12 GeV Ep = 15 – 100 GeV EPb = up to 40 GeV/A (EIC) (MEIC)

  10. Basic MEIC & EIC Performance EIC CLAS12 1034

  11. Neutron structure through spectator tagging kinematically corrected W spectrum on n in D smeared W spectrum on D CLAS BoNuS data with tagged spectators • In fixed-target experiments, scattering on bound neutrons is complicated • Fermi motion, nuclear effects • Low-momentum spectators • No polarization • The MEIC is designed from the outset to tag spectators, and all nuclear fragments. a» k/M MEIC CLAS + BoNuS CLAS

  12. Spectator tagging in a collider • PD = 100 GeV/c deuteron • pp» (PD/2)(1+a) + p • a < 50 MeV/1GeV, qS=p /(PD/2) ≤ 1 mrad • pn» (PD/2)(1–a) –p • Measure qn»p /(PD/2) accurately in Forward Hadronic Calorimeter. dqn» (1 cm)/(40 m) = 0.25 mrad • P(4He) = 200 GeV/c = ZP0 • Magnetic rigidity K(4He) = P/(ZB) = (100 GeV/c)/B = K0 • P(Spectator 3He) » (3/4)P(3He) K(3He) = (3/4) K0 • P(Spectator 3H) » (3/4)P(3H)  K(3H) = (3/2) K0 > K0

  13. DVCS examplesRecent white papers: arXiv:1212.1701arXiv:1209.0757 • k = 3 GeV, P = 100 GeV/c, s–M2 = 1200 GeV2 • xBj = 0.0021, y = 0.8, Q2 = xBjy(s–M2) = 2.0 GeV2 • qe = 56°, k’ = 0.77 GeV • Tag final state protons for all –t>0.04 GeV2 • xBj = 0.01, y = 0.8, Q2 = 10. GeV2 • qe = 99°, k’ = 1.4 GeV • Tag final state protons for all t • xBj = 0.03, y = 0.28, Q2 = 10. GeV2 • qe = 64°, k’ = 3 GeV • Tag final state protons for all t • Collider kinematics are different!! • k’ > k for xBj > k/P • Boosts and rotations do not commute! • Boost from Target rest frame to Collider frame induces mass-dependent rotations about beam axis. • Mp2 = 0.88 GeV2 >> mp2 » me2»0 >> q2= –Q2

  14. Parameters for Full AcceptanceInteraction Point Y. Zhang

  15. EIC timeline 1) Assumes endorsement for an EIC at the next NSAC Long Range Plan 2) Assumes relevant accelerator R&D for down-select process done around 2016

More Related