1 / 25

State Board Modeling Needs and Interests

This workshop provides a quick overview of event-based and continuous simulation modeling, discussing the program needs and interests related to water rights, TMDL, stormwater, and hydromodification. It explores the advantages and applications of both modeling approaches.

fredh
Download Presentation

State Board Modeling Needs and Interests

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Eric Berntsen, PH, CPESC, CPSWQ State Water Resources Control Board CWEMF Hydrology and Watershed Modeling Workshop June 22, 2007 State Board Modeling Needs and Interests

  2. State Board Modeling Needs and Interests • •Quick Overview of Event-Based and Continuous Simulation Modeling • Program Modeling Needs/Interests • Water Rights • TMDL • Storm Water

  3. Hydrologic Cycle From Lake (2004)

  4. From King County Department of Natural Resources

  5. From King County Department of Natural Resources

  6. Event-Based vs. Continuous Simulation Modeling • •Event-based models • e.g., NRCS Runoff Curve Number Method • Rational Method (Q=CIA) • Input rainfall, desired simulation period, and watershed characteristics

  7. Event-Based Models • Rainfall • Usually based on statistical analysis • Sometimes, historical storm information used • Example: 10-year, 24-hour storm

  8. Event-Based Models • Simulation period • Period typically ranges from 5 minutes to 24 hours • Shorter durations for peak flow calculations (e.g., 10-year, 30-minute storm)

  9. Event-Based Models • Watershed Characteristics • Relationship between rainfall and runoff identified (e.g. Rational Method “C” factor, Runoff Curve Number). • These coefficients/factors depend on soil infiltration rate, vegetation, land use, imperviousness, etc.

  10. From V.T. Chow (1964)

  11. Continuous Simulation Models • Use long term rainfall record (20-30 years) and can simulate flows for entire period of record • Incorporate evapotranspiration and infiltration estimates – simulate the water balance • We’ll talk about the major ones being used these days (HSPF, SWMM, etc.)

  12. Continuous Simulation Models • Continuous simulation models are better at predicting variability in flow and pollutant loads because they are based on long term observed hydrologic data • Output from these models can help assess expected variability and inform water resource decisions

  13. Program Needs – Water Rights • Two fundamental questions for each application to appropriate water: • Is there enough water available to supply applicant with the requested water amount? • Will diverting the requested amount affect existing users and beneficial uses? • Currently, no approved procedure to estimate flows

  14. Program Needs – Water Rights • Flow estimation procedures currently used: • Extrapolate gage data to gaged and ungaged watersheds • Modified Rational Method used in North Coast Streams • Desire to develop a suite of methods to estimate flow on daily time step (i.e., continuous simulation methods)

  15. Program Needs – Water Rights • Continuous simulation procedures would allow applicants and water rights staff to: • Estimate unimpaired runoff • Simulate various diversion scenarios • Estimate the range of geomorphically-significant flows

  16. Program Needs – TMDL • Accurate estimates of flow and pollutant loads are necessary to determine assimilative capacity of waterbodies and load allocations for land uses in watershed • Calculating flow and load on a daily timestep desireable

  17. Program Needs – Storm Water • Compliance with post-construction treatment requirements usually verified through modeling • Example-requirement to capture/treat 80% annual runoff volume • Projects may have specific load reduction targets • Event-based and continuous simulation models can be used

  18. Program Needs – Storm Water Sources of Impairment (USEPA 2006)

  19. Program Needs – Storm Water Hydromodification-historic approach (still done in many places)

  20. Program Needs – Storm Water • Need modeling tools that will allow us to assess and mitigate impacts from hydromodification • Event-based models are good at predicting large, infrequent flood flows, may not be as good at simulating the range of geomorphically-significant flows • Continuous simulation modeling is a promising approach

More Related