1 / 7

MCPFE Expert Level Meeting - ELM 14 -15 October 2004

Inaugural meeting of the UNECE/FAO Team of Specialists on “ Monitoring forest resources for SFM in the UNECE Region ”. MCPFE Expert Level Meeting - ELM 14 -15 October 2004. Roman Michalak. Geneva, Palais des Nations, 25-27 April 2005. 1990. FRA. 1990. Strasbourg. 1993. Helsinki.

garren
Download Presentation

MCPFE Expert Level Meeting - ELM 14 -15 October 2004

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Inaugural meeting of the UNECE/FAO Team of Specialists on“Monitoring forest resources for SFM in the UNECE Region” MCPFE Expert Level Meeting - ELM 14 -15October 2004 Roman Michalak Geneva, Palais des Nations, 25-27 April 2005

  2. 1990 FRA 1990 Strasbourg 1993 Helsinki I C&I I C&I TBFRA 1998 Lisbon p. TBFRA GFRA 2000 I C&I I C&I 2003 SoEF Vienna 2007 Warsaw Forest reporting under MCPFE and UNECE/FAO 1948 MCPFE UNECE FAO SFM

  3. 1948 MCPFE UNECE FAO 1990 FRA 1990 Strasbourg 1993 Helsinki I C&I I C&I TBFRA 1998 Lisbon p. TBFRA GFRA 2000 I C&I I C&I 2003 SoEF Vienna new f. 2005 GFRA 2007 Warsaw GFRA 2010 Forest reporting under MCPFE and UNECE/FAO SFM

  4. 1948 MCPFE UNECE FAO 1990 FRA 1990 Strasbourg 1993 Helsinki I C&I I C&I TBFRA 1998 Lisbon p. TBFRA GFRA 2000 I C&I I C&I 2003 SoEF Vienna new f. 2005 GFRA II C&I ”b” 2007 Warsaw ”a” GFRA 2010 Forest reporting under MCPFE and UNECE/FAO SFM

  5. Agreements • The ELM agreed that both qualitative andquantitative indicators should be taken into account when preparing the report on SFM forWarsaw Conference • The MCPFE General Coordinating Council had suggested that the Liaison Unit Warsaw would perform the reporting for the Warsaw Conference in co-operation with the UNECE/FAO secretariat, and supported by the Team of Specialists on “Monitoring Forest Resources for SFM in the UNECE region”.

  6. Agreements • The need for further development of co-operation amongthe MCPFE and other C&I processes, in particular the Montreal Process, was expressed. • Regional processes should fit the global frame, which at the same timeshould consider specific regional conditions. • The ELM also noted that the reporting should be harmonized with relevant international processes (to the extent possible).

  7. Agreements • The participants of the ELM underlined the importance of involving relevant institutions into the preparatory process and recommended making the best use of existing networks and expertise. • In order to have this report completed on time and to be able to make the best use of existing networks and expertise “involved partners should be working together in a rather informal and flexible way”.

More Related