1 / 7

Political Participation

Political Participation. Who participates and what difference does it make?. Forms of participation:. Voluntary participation: self-motivated – individuals decide to participate Regimented participation: the government (or ruling party) forces people to participate

gautam
Download Presentation

Political Participation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Political Participation Who participates and what difference does it make?

  2. Forms of participation: • Voluntary participation: self-motivated – individuals decide to participate • Regimented participation: the government (or ruling party) forces people to participate • Characteristic of totalitarian and some authoritarian regimes • Mobilized participation: parties, trade unions, churches, interest groups encourage people to participate – not coerced but combination of incentives plus strong element of persuasion

  3. Some key questions: • Who participates in politics? • How does it vary? • from country to country? • within countries? • What accounts for differences and similarities? • What difference does it make? The ‘so what’ question

  4. The ‘more the more’ hypothesis: • People with higher social and economic status (SES), and more education more likely to participate • If so, then: • There will be more participation in wealthier societies than in poorer societies • Participating more, better-offs in any society should have more influence than worse-offs

  5. Post-materialism and value change `Erst das fressen, dan die morale’ • According to Ronald Inglehart, people who are raised (or come of age) in affluent societies are more likely to to hold post-material or radical quality of life values • People who are raised in situations of economic scarcity are more likely to hold materialistic values

  6. Is this true? • Those at the bottom should have greater motivation to participate • Working class parties have mobilized followers in order to ensure a voice • But, how effectively and how recently? • If the very poor do not participate as much, why do they not participate?

  7. Is this true? • Those at the bottom should have greater motivation to participate • Working class parties have mobilized followers in order to ensure a voice • But, how effectively and how recently? • If the very poor do not participate as much, why do they not participate?

More Related