1 / 57

Hubbard model(s)

Hubbard model(s). Eugene Demler Harvard University. Collaboration with E. Altman (Weizmann), R. Barnett (Caltech), A. Imambekov (Yale), A.M. Rey (JILA), D. Pekker, R. Sensarma, M. Lukin , and many others. Collaborations with experimental groups of

gay
Download Presentation

Hubbard model(s)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Hubbard model(s) Eugene Demler Harvard University Collaboration with E. Altman (Weizmann), R. Barnett (Caltech), A. Imambekov (Yale), A.M. Rey (JILA), D. Pekker, R. Sensarma, M. Lukin, and many others Collaborations with experimental groups of I. Bloch, T. Esslinger $$ NSF, AFOSR, MURI, DARPA,

  2. Outline Bose Hubbard model. Superfluid and Mott phases Extended Hubbard model: CDW and Supersolid states Two component Bose Hubbard model: magnetic superexchange interactions in the Mott states Bose Hubbard model for F=1 bosons: exotic spin states Fermi Hubbard model: competing orders Hubbard model beyond condensed matter paradigms: nonequilibrium many-body quantum dynamics

  3. Bose Hubbard modelAtoms in optical lattices Theory: Jaksch et al. PRL (1998) Experiment: Kasevich et al., Science (2001); Greiner et al., Nature (2001); Phillips et al., J. Physics B (2002) Esslinger et al., PRL (2004); many more …

  4. U t Bose Hubbard model tunneling of atoms between neighboring wells repulsion of atoms sitting in the same well

  5. Bose Hubbard model. Mean-field phase diagram M.P.A. Fisher et al., PRB40:546 (1989) N=3 Mott 4 Superfluid N=2 Mott 0 2 N=1 Mott 0 Superfluid phase Weak interactions Mott insulator phase Strong interactions

  6. Optical lattice and parabolic potential N=3 4 N=2 MI SF 2 N=1 MI 0 Jaksch et al., PRL 81:3108 (1998)

  7. Mott insulator Superfluid t/U Superfluid to Insulator transition Greiner et al., Nature 415:39 (2002)

  8. Shell structure in optical lattice S. Foelling et al., PRL 97:060403 (2006) Observation of spatial distribution of lattice sites using spatially selective microwave transitions and spin changing collisions n=1 n=2 superfluid regime Mott regime

  9. Extended Hubbard modelCharge Density Wave and Supersolid phases

  10. - on site repulsion - nearest neighbor repulsion Extended Hubbard Model Checkerboard phase: Crystal phase of bosons. Breaks translational symmetry

  11. Extended Hubbard model. Mean field phase diagram van Otterlo et al., PRB 52:16176 (1995) Hard core bosons. Supersolid – superfluid phase with broken translational symmetry

  12. Extended Hubbard model. Quantum Monte Carlo study Hebert et al., PRB 65:14513 (2002) Sengupta et al., PRL 94:207202 (2005)

  13. Dipolar bosons in optical lattices Goral et al., PRL88:170406 (2002)

  14. Two component Bose Hubbard model. Magnetism

  15. t t Two component Bose mixture in optical lattice Example: . Mandel et al., Nature 425:937 (2003) Two component Bose Hubbard model

  16. Quantum magnetism of bosons in optical lattices Kuklov and Svistunov, PRL (2003) • Ferromagnetic • Antiferromagnetic Duan et al., PRL (2003)

  17. Exchange Interactions in Solids antibonding bonding Kinetic energy dominates: antiferromagnetic state Coulomb energy dominates: ferromagnetic state

  18. Two component Bose mixture in optical lattice.Mean field theory + Quantum fluctuations Altman et al., NJP 5:113 (2003) Hysteresis 1st order 2nd order line

  19. Realization of spin liquid using cold atoms in an optical lattice Duan et al. PRL 91:94514 (2003) Kitaev model H = - Jx Ssix sjx - JySsiy sjy- JzSsiz sjz Ground state has topological order Excitations are Abelian or non-Abelian anyons

  20. J J Use magnetic field gradient to prepare a state Observe oscillations between and states Observation of superexchange in a double well potential Theory: A.M. Rey et al., PRL 99:140601 (2008)

  21. Preparation and detection of Mott states of atoms in a double well potential

  22. Comparison to the Hubbard model Experiments: S. Trotzky et al., Science 319:295 (2008)

  23. Spin F=1 bosons in optical lattices Spin exchange interactions. Exotic spin orders (nematic, valence bond solid)

  24. Spinor condensates in optical traps Spin symmetric interaction of F=1 atoms Ferromagnetic Interactions for Antiferromagnetic Interactions for

  25. Antiferromagnetic spin F=1 atoms in optical lattices Hubbard Hamiltonian Demler, Zhou, PRL (2003) Symmetry constraints Nematic Mott Insulator Spin Singlet Mott Insulator

  26. Nematic insulating phase for N=1 Effective S=1 spin model Imambekov et al., PRA (2003) the ground state is nematic in d=2,3. When One dimensional systems are dimerized: Rizzi et al., PRL (2005)

  27. U t t Fermionic Hubbard model P.W. Anderson (1950) J. Hubbard (1963)

  28. Fermionic Hubbard modelPhenomena predicted Superexchange and antiferromagnetism (P.W. Anderson) Itinerant ferromagnetism. Stoner instability (J. Hubbard) Incommensurate spin order. Stripes (Schulz, Zaannen, Emery, Kivelson, White, Scalapino, Sachdev, …) Mott state without spin order. Dynamical Mean Field Theory (Kotliar, Georges,…) d-wave pairing (Scalapino, Pines,…) d-density wave (Affleck, Marston, Chakravarty, Laughlin,…)

  29. Superexchange and antiferromagnetismin the Hubbard model. Large U limit Singlet state allows virtual tunneling and regains some kinetic energy Triplet state: virtual tunneling forbidden by Pauli principle Effective Hamiltonian: Heisenberg model

  30. Q=(p,p) Hubbard model for small U. Antiferromagnetic instability at half filling Analysis of spin instabilities. Random Phase Approximation Fermi surface for n=1 Nesting of the Fermi surface leads to singularity BCS-type instability for weak interaction

  31. paramagnetic Mott phase Hubbard model at half filling TN Paramagnetic Mott phase: one fermion per site charge fluctuations suppressed no spin order U BCS-type theory applies Heisenberg model applies

  32. Doped Hubbard model

  33. Attraction between holes in the Hubbard model Loss of superexchange energy from 8 bonds Loss of superexchange energy from 7 bonds

  34. -k’ k’ spin fluctuation k -k Pairing of holes in the Hubbard model Non-local pairing of holes Leading istability: d-wave Scalapino et al, PRB (1986)

  35. -k’ k’ spin fluctuation k -k Pairing of holes in the Hubbard model BCS equation for pairing amplitude Q - + + - Systems close to AF instability: c(Q) is large and positive Dk should change sign for k’=k+Q dx2-y2

  36. Stripe phases in the Hubbard model Stripes: Antiferromagnetic domains separated by hole rich regions Antiphase AF domains stabilized by stripe fluctuations First evidence: Hartree-Fock calculations. Schulz, Zaannen (1989)

  37. Stripe phases in ladders t-J model DMRG study of t-J model on ladders Scalapino, White, PRL 2003

  38. T AF pseudogap D-SC SDW n=1 doping Possible Phase Diagram AF – antiferromagnetic SDW- Spin Density Wave (Incommens. Spin Order, Stripes) D-SC – d-wave paired After several decades we do not yet know the phase diagram

  39. Antiferromagnetic and superconducting Tc of the order of 100 K Fermionic Hubbard model From high temperature superconductors to ultracold atoms Atoms in optical lattice Antiferromagnetism and pairing at sub-micro Kelvin temperatures

  40. U t t Fermionic atoms in optical lattices Noninteracting fermions in optical lattice, Kohl et al., PRL 2005

  41. Signatures of incompressible Mott state of fermions in optical lattice Suppression of double occupancies R. Joerdens et al., Nature (2008) Compressibility measurements U. Schneider et al., Science (2008)

  42. TN current experiments Mott U Fermions in optical lattice. Next challenge: antiferromagnetic state

  43. Nonequilibrium dynamics of the Hubbard model.Decay of repulsively bound pairs

  44. Relaxation of repulsively bound pairs in the Fermionic Hubbard model U >> t For a repulsive bound pair to decay, energy U needs to be absorbed by other degrees of freedom in the system Relaxation timescale is important for quantum simulations, adiabatic preparation

  45. Fermions in optical lattice.Decay of repulsively bound pairs Experimets: T. Esslinger et. al.

  46. Relaxation of doublon hole pairs in the Mott state Energy U needs to be absorbed by spin excitations • Relaxation requires • creation of ~U2/t2 • spin excitations • Energy carried by spin excitations ~ J =4t2/U Relaxation rate Very slow Relaxation

  47. p-h p-h U p-h p-p Doublon decay in a compressible state Excess energy U is converted to kinetic energy of single atoms Compressible state: Fermi liquid description Doublon can decay into a pair of quasiparticles with many particle-hole pairs

  48. Doublon decay in a compressible state Perturbation theory to order n=U/t Decay probability To calculate the rate: consider processes which maximize the number of particle-hole excitations

  49. Doublon decay in a compressible state Doublon Single fermion hopping Doublon decay Doublon-fermion scattering Fermion-fermion scattering due to projected hopping

  50. Doublon decay in a compressible state Doublon decay with generation of particle-hole pairs Theory: R. Sensarma, D. Pekker, et. al.

More Related