1 / 29

Crimes against Children Research Center University of New Hampshire Janis Wolak Kimberly Mitchell

"Internet-initiated Sex Crimes against Minors: Implications for Prevention of Findings from a National Study.". Crimes against Children Research Center University of New Hampshire Janis Wolak Kimberly Mitchell David Finkelhor, CCRC Director. Research funded by The National Center for

gemma-lyons
Download Presentation

Crimes against Children Research Center University of New Hampshire Janis Wolak Kimberly Mitchell

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. "Internet-initiated Sex Crimes against Minors: Implications for Prevention of Findings from a National Study." Crimes against Children Research Center University of New Hampshire • Janis Wolak • Kimberly Mitchell • David Finkelhor, CCRC Director

  2. Research funded by The National Center for Missing & Exploited Children & US Department of Justice, OJJDP

  3. Abducted by a Mouse

  4. Internet Friend

  5. Internet predators: The stereotype Predators are pedophiles who • Use the Internet to target grade school children • Lie about their identities, ages & motives • Trick children into divulging their names and addresses • Abduct and forcibly assault victims

  6. National Juvenile Online Victimization Study A national survey of law enforcement arrests for Internet-related crimes with juvenile victims

  7. Over 2500 LEAs sampled – 88% responded Number of agencies per state Number of Agencies 2 to 24 25 to 44 45 to 69 70 to 149 (Quartiles)

  8. Follow-up telephone interviews

  9. How can we best characterize and protect the children at risk?

  10. Arrested Internet Offenders with Identified Juvenile Victims 998 arrested in one year period (2000-1) • half were Internet-initiated crimes • half were by family members and acquaintances, who used the Internet to facilitate All involved victims located and contacted by investigators Remaining slides concern Internet-initiated

  11. Victims in Internet-initiated crimes were young teens

  12. Most of the victims were girls

  13. Most men met their victims in chatrooms • 76% of initial Internet meetings happened in chat rooms • 10% happened through Instant Messages • 5% through e-mail • 5% other ways • Phone chat lines, websites

  14. Offenders were much older than victims

  15. Youth knew the men were much older Deceptions about age by offenders • 5% claimed to be minors (under 18) • 25% shaved years off their ages, but still presented themselves as older adults • 70% did not lie about their ages

  16. Youth knew the men wanted sex Most offenders openly solicited victims • Brought up sexual topics online– 80% • Engaged in cybersex with victims – 20% • Transmitted sexual pictures – 18% • Nude or sexual pictures of themselves – 8% • Adult pornography – 10% • Child pornography – 9%

  17. Offenders lied to some extent About … • Physical appearance & other aspects of identity • Sexual motives • Of these, many were open about sexual motives; lies involved promises of love & romance A few offenders posed as “friends,” then assaulted their victims A few offenders devised ploys

  18. However, most deceptions were not material • Little deceit about being a peer • Some deceit about being younger • Little deceit about sexual motives • Most offenders who were deceptive about age did not deceive about sexual motives

  19. Men befriended and romanced youth • Online communications for a month or more • Telephone calls • Pictures • Gifts and money

  20. Half of the victims felt love or close friendship for offenders Among girls • 59% felt love or close friendship Among boys • About one-quarter were close to or in love with offenders

  21. Most cases involved face-to-face sexual encounters • 74% -- face-to-face meetings • 93% of the face-to-face meetings involved sexual contact between offenders and victims

  22. Most youth who met men once, met them again In cases where offenders and victims met face-to-face • 73% met each other more than once • 13% -- 2 times • 40% -- 3 or more times • 20% -- Lived together for some period

  23. A small number of cases involved violence or coercion 5% of cases involved violence • Forcible rape and attempted rape • Sadistic sex 16% involved coercion

  24. Revise stereotypes used in publicity and training Because Internet-initiated offenders • Are rarely violent or aggressive • Do not rely primarily on deception • Do not target prepubescent victims • Are not pedophiles • Often operate locally • Rarely abduct • Are not strangers to victims • Exploit the willingness of young adolescent to contemplate sexual relationships with adults

  25. Current prevention focus We tell adolescents: • Don’t go to meetings with strangers • Don’t give out personal information • Beware of deception • Tell an adult if someone makes you uncomfortable

  26. What is missing? For teenagers: • Why having sexual relationships with older men is a bad idea For adults: • Why having sex with teenagers is a bad idea For parents • Why to have this conversation with your kids

  27. Teens should know • This is a crime for adults; they’ll go to jail • The sense of being understood and appreciated may be a manipulation • Caring and responsible adults do not proposition kids • Victims feel betrayed • If you pose for sexual pictures, they may come back to haunt you • Don’t be a sucker

  28. Revising stereotypes has implications for training • Counteract police and prosecutor prejudices about statutory/compliant victims • Psychology of statutory victims • Psychology of gay youth • Techniques for working with less cooperative teen victims • Vertical prosecution, advocates, peer support

  29. Crimes against Children Research Center, University of New Hampshire www.unh.edu/ccrc • Janis Wolak • Kimberly Mitchell • David Finkelhor, Director

More Related