1 / 42

Andrei Temchin

Shyamla Narayan. Alberto Recio. Ed Overstreet. Andrei Temchin. Burt Evans. Laboratory for Hearing Biology (~1996). Laboratory for Hearing Biology (today). Luis Robles. Jon Siegel. Andrei Temchin. Yun-Hui Fan. Qin Gong. Yi-Bo Fan.

george
Download Presentation

Andrei Temchin

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Shyamla Narayan Alberto Recio Ed Overstreet Andrei Temchin Burt Evans Laboratory for Hearing Biology (~1996)

  2. Laboratory for Hearing Biology (today) Luis Robles Jon Siegel Andrei Temchin Yun-Hui Fan Qin Gong Yi-Bo Fan

  3. AT THE BASE OF THE COCHLEA, BASILAR-MEMBRANE RESPONSES TO CHARACTERISTIC-FREQUENCY TONES GROW AT HIGHLY COMPRESSIVE RATES (e.g., 0.2 dB/dB) chinchilla guinea pig cat

  4. COMPRESSIVE NONLINEARITY IN BASILAR-MEMBRANE RESPONSES TO CLICKS

  5. IN SPITE OF THE PROMINENT NONLINEARITIES OF BASILAR-MEMBRANE VIBRATIONS, THE FOURIER SPECTRA OF RESPONSES TO CLICKS MATCH, LEVEL BY LEVEL, THE RESPONSES TO TONES

  6. GROWTH OF PEAKS IN RESPONSES TO CLICKS AS A FUNCTION OF STIMULUS LEVEL

  7. COMPRESSIVE NONLINEARITY IS PRESENT WITHIN A SINGLE PERIOD OF RESPONSE OSCILLATION

  8. IN THE CHINCHILLA, BASILAR-MEMBRANE RESPONSES ARE MORE SHARPLY TUNED AND EXHIBIT GREATER NONLINEARITY AT THE BASE OF THE COCHLEA THAN AT THE APEX

  9. Compression and other nonlinearities of BM responses probably arise in nonlinear transduction in outer hair cells Cooper, 2003

  10. RESPONSES OF AUDITORY-NERVE FIBERS EXHIBIT AN INTENSITY-DEPENDENT PHASE SHIFT THAT IS NOT PRESENT IN BASILAR- MEMBRANE RESPONSES

  11. SECOND-ORDER WIENER KERNELS OF AUDITORY-NERVE FIBERS RESPONSES TO NOISE

  12. FRONT, GROUP AND FILTER DELAYS

  13. MAP OF DELAYS FOR THE CHINCHILLA COCHLEA

  14. COMPARISON OF GROUP DELAYS OF BASILAR-MEMBRANE VIBRATIONS AND STIMULUS-FREQUENCY OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS (SFOAEs)

  15. BASILA-MEMBRANE RESPONSES AT THE BASE OF THE COCHLEA ARE NOT MINIMUM-PHASE Original response Minimum-phase version (time domain) 44 dB SPL 104 dB SPL

  16. BASAL RESPONSES ARE NOT MINIMUM-PHASE 44 dB SPL 104 dB SPL (frequency domain)

  17. THE MEASURED PHASE SHIFTS AS A FUNCTION OF GAIN ARE MUCH SMALLER THAN EXPECTED FROM MINIMUM-PHASE BEHAVIOR

  18. EVEN POST-MORTEM RESPONSES ARE NOT MINIMUM-PHASE

  19. BASILAR-MEMBRANE RESPONSES AT THE APEX OF THE COCHLEA ARE NOT MINIMUM-PHASE

  20. DEVELOPMENT OF BASILAR-MEMBRANE VIBRATIONS IN NEW-BORN GERBILS: RUDIMENTARY TRAVELING WAVE

  21. POST-MORTEM BASILAR-MEMBRANE RESPONSES IN ADULT GERBIL ARE NOT MINIMUM-PHASE

  22. BUT IN-VIVO BASILAR-MEMBRANE RESPONSES IN IMMATURE COCHLEAE ARE MINIMUM-PHASE

More Related