1 / 9

Global Comparison of Light-Duty Vehicle Fuel Economy/GHG Emissions Standards

Global Comparison of Light-Duty Vehicle Fuel Economy/GHG Emissions Standards. Update: August 2011. Overview of Regulation Specifications. * Assumes manufacturers fully use A/C credit

ginny
Download Presentation

Global Comparison of Light-Duty Vehicle Fuel Economy/GHG Emissions Standards

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Global Comparison of Light-Duty Vehicle Fuel Economy/GHG Emissions Standards Update: August 2011

  2. Overview of Regulation Specifications * Assumes manufacturers fully use A/C credit ** Proposed CAFE standard by NHTSA. It is equivalent to 163g/mi plus CO2 credits for using low-GWP A/C refrigerants. “** In April 2010, Canada announced a target of 153 g/km for MY2016. Value in brackets is estimated target for MY2016, assuming that during 2008 and 2016 the fuel efficiency of the LDV fleet in Canada will achieve a 5.5% annual improvement rate (the same as the U.S.). This estimate is used in the accompanying charts.

  3. Historical fleet CO2 emissions performance andcurrent or proposed standards

  4. Historical fleet fuel economy performance andcurrent or proposed standards

  5. Historical fleet fuel consumption performance and current or proposed standards

  6. Total and annual percentage CO2 reduction with enacted and proposed targets Regions are ordered according to their overall improvement/reduction rate. ** Baseline year for each regulatory period is the first year of that period. For example, the US overall reduction rate is 17% for the MY 2012-2016, and 35% for MY 2017-2025 . One cannot combine 17% and 35% to get the overall reduction rate from 2012 to 2025.

  7. Total and annual percentage fuel economy improvement with enacted and proposed targets Regions are ordered according to their overall improvement/reduction rate. ** Baseline year for each regulatory period is the first year of that period. For example, the US overall reduction rate is 15% for the MY 2012-2016, and 46% for MY 2017-2025 . One cannot combine the two values to get the overall reduction rate from 2012 to 2025.

  8. Four markets absolute and annual rate comparison

  9. Thank you Washington DC • San Francisco • Brussels www.theicct.org +1 202 534 1617 www.twitter.com/TheICCT

More Related