1 / 15

Musicians and Hearing Loss: Comparison to a non-noise exposed population

Musicians and Hearing Loss: Comparison to a non-noise exposed population Incidence and Risk Factors Shanda Brashears-Morlet 1 , Michael Santucci 2 , Thierry G. Morlet 3 1 – Department of Genetics, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana

gino
Download Presentation

Musicians and Hearing Loss: Comparison to a non-noise exposed population

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Musicians and Hearing Loss: Comparison to a non-noise exposed population Incidence and Risk Factors Shanda Brashears-Morlet1, Michael Santucci2, Thierry G. Morlet3 1 – Department of Genetics, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana 2 – Sensaphonics Hearing Conservation, Chicago, Illinois 3 – Auditory Physiology and Psychoacoustics Laboratory, Alfred I. duPont Hospital for Children, Wilmington, Delaware

  2. Aims • Examine the hearing of a large group of musicians as compared to a non-noise exposed normative population. • Determine the incidence of high frequency hearing loss. • Analyze various risk factors for hearing loss among musicians.

  3. Methods • 1018 musicians completed tympanometry, audiometry and a case history / life styles survey. • Those with conductive hearing loss, positive history for ototoxic meds, acoustic neuroma or significant exposure to noise other than music were eliminated from threshold and risk factor analysis leaving 887 subjects.

  4. Results • 537 (52.8%) reported using hearing protections prior to participation • 358 foam or rubber • 97 custom musicians’ plugs • 22 paper, cotton, or bar napkins • 17 muffs or earphones • 22 didn’t answer as to the type of protection • 110 (10.8%) reported that they perceive they have a hearing loss as compared to 19.5% who actually did have a hearing loss

  5. Musicians vs. Non-Musicians • Musicians’ thresholds were compared to the ISO 7029:2000 standard for 250 – 8kHz. • Musicians’ thresholds were consistently worse for all frequencies except 8000 Hz. • The largest difference between musicians’ thresholds and norms were for 2000, 3000, 4000 and 6000 Hz.

  6. Audiometric Configuration Comparison of men in their 20s N=415

  7. Audiometric Configuration Comparison of men in their 30s N=263

  8. Audiometric Configuration Comparison of men in their 40s N=145

  9. Incidence of High Frequency Hearing Loss Among Musicians Minimal Hearing Loss Hearing Loss Noise Notch % of men RE 44.3 20.3 54.2 % of men LE 58.2 34.8 66.5 % of women RE 29.9 12.0 49.6 % of women LE 28.3 10.8 45.0 • Minimal high frequency hearing loss defined as any threshold above 1KHz of 20 dB HL or worse in either ear. • High frequency hearing loss defined as any threshold above 1KHz of 30 dB HL or worse in either ear. • High frequency noise notch defined as 10 dB or better thresholds one octave above and below any frequency above 1500 Hz in either ear, degree of hearing level not withstanding.

  10. Incidence of Asymmetries and Tinnitus • 39.0% of musicians had at least one frequency over 1500 Hz with thresholds 15 dB apart or more. • 60.0% reported at least occasional tinnitus. • 77.1 % had at least one sign of hearing damage, either minimal hearing loss, noise notch, asymmetry and / or tinnitus.

  11. Factors Impacted Hearing Status • Age and gender seemed to have the biggest impact high frequency hearing loss (p<.005). • Years of experience independent of age was significant for the right ear (p=.018) and nearly so for the left (p=.060). • Hours / week of exposure (p=.087 right ear; p=.122 left ear) • Right ears were better than left, but not significantly (p=.110). • Prior use of hearing protection did have a positive effect on high frequency hearing (p=.116 right ear; p=.035 left ear).

  12. Factors With No Apparent Effect The following factors did not appear to impact high frequency hearing: genre (i.e. rock vs. classical vs. jazz), hours since exposure, use of headphones, family history, dizziness, diabetes, high blood pressure and use of tobacco, alcohol, caffeine, or aspirin.

  13. Factors Related to Hearing • Those with an asymmetry had significantly worse thresholds than those with symmetrical hearing (p<.001 for right and left ears). • Similarly, the presence of a noise notch was associated with higher high frequency pure tone averages (p<.001 for right and left ears). • Surprisingly, those who reported tinnitus were not any more likely to have a hearing loss.

  14. Conclusions • Musicians had poorer thresholds, especially at 3, 4 and 6K Hz than the ISO standard. • A noise notch effect was seen in all age groups and became more pronounced with age. • The incidence of hearing loss was high, but comparable with previous studies such as Axelsson et al. (1995) and Kaharit et al. (2003). • The factors which had the most apparent effect on hearing status were age, gender, years of experience, hours / week of exposure, and prior use of hearing protectors.

  15. References • Axelsson A, Eliasson A, Israelsson, B. (1995) Hearing in pop-rock musicians: A follow-up study. Ear Hear 16(3):245-254. • Kaharit K, Zachau G, Eklof M, Sandsjo L, Moller C. (2003) Assessment of hearing and hearing disorders in rock/jazz musicians. Int J Audiol 42(5):279-88. Acknowledgements • This study was funded by Shure Inc. • Thank you to …. and all the staff of Sensaphonics Hearing Conservation • Additional thanks to Charles Berlin, Linda Hood, and Bronya Keats of the Kresge Hearing Research Lab

More Related