Fellowship

1. Fellowship Baltimore Fellows Committee

2. The College of Fellows The College of Fellows, founded in 1952, is composed of members of the Institute who are elected to Fellowship by a jury of their peers. “It is not the purpose of the Fellowship to create an aristocracy of membership, but to give those who have shown their worth an accolade and a charge that their responsibilities have just begun.”

3. Agenda • What is the Baltimore Fellows Committee (BFC)? • The timeline for the process • How the BFC can assist you. • Demystifying Fellowship • The Categories for advancement • Qualifications needed for advancement • How the process works

4. Purpose of Baltimore Fellows Committee (BFC) • To identify and encourage potential candidates to seek Fellowship and to inform them of the selection process. • To review the credentials of Members presented to the BFC and to discuss the members’ chances for success. • To provide input to the candidates and sponsors on the content and format of their submissions.

5. Timeline • 2/24 – BFC open meeting • 2/24 – 4/15 – Identify Fellows candidates and find a sponsor for each candidate • 4/27 – Initial Submission by Sponsor of candidate’s qualifications to the BFC • 4/27 – 5/30 – Review and comment – BFC will meet with candidates and sponsors to comment on Initial Submissions

6. Timeline (continued) • 6/28 – Initial draft meeting • 7/12 – Revised Draft due • 8/1 – Final Nomination package Draft due • 9/13 – Final Nomination package due • 10/4 – Signature Pages due at Chapter for signature • 10/? – Submission and Reference letters due to AIA National

7. Demystifying Fellowship February 24, 2010 Walter Schamu, FAIA, former Chair of Fellows Jury

8. Presentation Agenda • Important Dates/Changes • Understanding the Jury Process • What the Jury Looks For • The Submission Process • Resources • FAIA Data and Statistics • Question & Answers

9. Important Dates • October x, 2010 - Electronic Submissions Due - Reference Letters Due - Before 8:00 p.m. Eastern Time (NEW) • January xx-xx, 2011 - Jury Meeting • February x, 2011 (at the latest) - E-mail notification

10. Important Changes • Electronic filing time change • File Size Change - less than 6 MB - personal photo/portrait NOT part of single PDF

11. 2011 Jury of Fellows • Henry C. Alexander Jr., FAIA (Florida) • Jeffrey A. Huberman, FAIA (North Carolina) • Paula Loomis, FAIA (Virginia) • Robert Loversidge, FAIA (Ohio) • Gregory Palermo, FAIA (Iowa) • TBD • TBD

12. Jury Responsibilities • Review 1/7 of total submissions (30 -35) • Present assigned candidates • View summary section for each and every candidate • Rule: • A juror may not review candidates from their own firm or region

13. Jury Process • Candidates presented alphabetically • Jurors review submission simultaneously • Presenter draws attention to what does or does not support claims • Presenter answers questions from jurors and makes recommendation

14. Jury Process • Jury discussion – 10-12 minutes total THEREFORE: • Critical for submission to be - clear and concise - results oriented - well-documented influence on profession

15. Voting Process • Only six jurors vote – one sits out • Juror from that region or firm, or next presenter • Takes a minimum 4 votes for elevation • Unanimous vote NOT REQUIRED • Ties are set aside until the end

16. There are NO QUOTAS • Number of candidates elevated • Number of candidates per category • Number of categories per component or region Quotas of any kind are a myth!

17. What the Jury is Looking For • Has nominee been nationally recognized? • Has the nominee had a “ripple effect”? • Has the nominee been active in the AIA?

18. What the Jury is Looking For • Strong sponsor letter • Strong reference letters • Well organized submission • High quality images/exhibits • Consistency • Leadership • Results

19. What the Jury is Looking For Distinguished Body of Work • Published work • Award recognition Notable Contribution • Impact on other practices • Lecturing • National leadership

20. What the Jury is Looking For Widespread Recognition of Results • Publications • Awards • Requests to speak • Requests to serve on juries

21. What the Jury is Looking For Sharing of Knowledge or Expertise • Speaking and leading seminars • Publications in architecture journals • Publications in associated professional journals • National news media coverage • Published peer recognition

22. What the Jury is Looking For Leadership in the AIA • National office • Local and regional offices • Committee chair • Served on juries • Authored articles • Presented at conventions • Need impact and results

23. Submission Composition • Sponsor Letter • Section 1 Summary • Section 2 Accomplishments • Section 3 Exhibits • Section 4 References

24. Sponsor • Must be an FAIA or AIA member in good standing • Must provide a one page letter of support • Should be BEST and WORST critic • May sponsor more than one candidate, but they should be in different categories

25. Sponsor • Should be very knowledgeable about candidate's accomplishments • Involved in submission process • Speaks directly and specifically of achievements • Serves as a buffer between candidate and references • LAY IT ALL OUT IN THE LETTER

26. Object 1 - Design • Design, Urban Design, and Preservation • MUST have 5 projects where candidate is “Largely Responsible for Design” • Jury doesn’t judge design • Jury looks for peer recognition through awards, articles, etc…

27. Object 2 – Education, Literature, Research, or Practice Practice • Having a good firm is your job • How are you sharing with the profession? Specialty Practice • Show that through design the field is better • Might not have Honor Awards – OK Education - Show impact through teaching tools; student work

28. Object 3 – Led the Institute or Related Organization Led Institute • Jury looking for “So What?” factor • Provide quantifiable results Led Related Organization • Not enough just to lead it • What did you do to connect it to the AIA?

29. Object 4 – Advancement of Living Standards • Government industry or organization • Need to document the benefit to the AIA • How is your work affecting policies? • How are you making things easier for architects in the profession?

30. Object 5 – Alternative Career, Volunteer, Service to Society • Show how contributions are significant because the nominee is an architect • Volunteer work not used as marketing tool • Must be clear you are NOT gaining commissions through volunteer service

31. Fellowship Submission • Story about YOU – but not womb to tomb. • WHO you are • WHAT you accomplished • WHEN it occurred • WHY it’s significant • HOW benefited/shared with profession • PROVE IT! – documentation and support

32. Section 1 - Summary • This is where you lay out your case • Your “architectural tombstone” • Focus on about 3 main points • Expand information in Section 2

33. Section 1 - Summary • Be clear, concise, succinct • Restate claims from sponsor letter • HAMMER IT IN! • Prove “ripple effect” of work • Local work OK, but show broad impact

34. Section 2 - Accomplishments • 2.1 Significant Work - Projects - Jury Service - Presentations - AIA Involvement - Civic/Volunteer Involvement • 2.2 Honors, Awards, Recognition • 2.3 Publications

35. Section 2 - Accomplishments • Demonstrate broad influence and impact • Can reformat, but keep in same order • Group similar accomplishments together • Jury needs a quick visual of - lectures and seminars - awards - publications

36. Section 2 - Accomplishments • Work supporting YOUR case first • Explain any time gaps • Divide up different types of awards • Make distinction about articles - about you - authored by you

37. Section 3 - Exhibits • Exhibits supporting YOUR case first • Show tangible results • If submitting in design - Show more than minimum of 5 projects - BUT use only your strongest projects • If not in design, don’t put projects first • One picture worth 1,000 words

38. Section 4 - References • Each reference focus on one-two points • Speak directly about your work • Seek those with a direct connection • Recognized leaders in your field • Broad geographic range • Avoid “big names” offering no substance

39. In Short… • Clear, Concise Presentation • Strong Sponsor • Strong/Specific References • Support for Summary Statement • Focus on Results/Achievements • Demonstrate Influence on Profession

40. Resources • www.aia.org/practicing/awards/AIAS075320 - FAIA FAQ - Online Submission FAQ - Fellowship Walk-through - Best Examples • honorsawards@aia.org • 202-626-7563 (Elizabeth Henry) • 202-626-7390 (Robin Lee, Hon. AIA)