1 / 31

Gladewater ISD CIA Process August 12, 2014

Gladewater ISD CIA Process August 12, 2014. Written - Curriculum. Written - Curriculum. Taught - Instruction. Written - Curriculum. Tested - Assessment. Taught - Instruction. What we know.

gurit
Download Presentation

Gladewater ISD CIA Process August 12, 2014

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Gladewater ISDCIA ProcessAugust 12, 2014

  2. Written - Curriculum

  3. Written - Curriculum Taught - Instruction

  4. Written - Curriculum Tested - Assessment Taught - Instruction

  5. What we know • “Good things” were happening each day in classrooms all across our district but these “good things” were not happening in a guaranteed and systematic way • There were “pockets” of implementation • Random acts of improvement • What we were currently doing was not going to get us where we wanted to be

  6. The GoalWorking Hard on the “Right Things” We wanted to develop a process based on what we considered to be the most important activities(the right things) that should be taking place on every campus in our district. After deciding on those activities, we had to define the “beginning, developing, and accomplished teacher.”

  7. The GoalWorking Hard on the “Right Things” We wanted to develop a process based on what we considered to be the most important activities(the right things) that should be taking place on every campus in our district. After deciding on those activities, we had to define the “beginning, developing, and accomplished teacher.”

  8. CIA ProcessComponents • Prior year STAAR Data Disaggregation • STAAR/EOC/TAKS performance and goal setting • Six Week Formative/Mock assessments • Collaboration (PLC) • Technology integration

  9. CIA ProcessComponents • Prior year STAAR Data Disaggregation • STAAR/EOC/TAKS performance and goal setting • Six Week Formative/Mock assessments • Collaboration (PLC) • Technology integration

  10. What we know Concerning STAAR/EOC/TAKS • Concerning STAAR/EOC/TAKS • All teachers needed to disaggregate STAAR/EOC/TAKS data and understand how students are performing • All teachers needed to be setting STAAR goals • More than just knowing how many students passed last year • Down to the student expectation level • Principals needed a way to make comparisons between teachers to identify strengths and weaknesses on their campuses and discuss improvements

  11. STAAR/EOC/TAKS Data DisaggregationUsing DMAC • Beginning • Prior STAAR/EOC/TAKS results are recorded by TEKS taught • Developing • Individual Students, • sub groups • Pass/fail • Accomplished • Broken down by S E, objective, and sub groups

  12. DMAC Data

  13. Goal Setting • Beginning • Specific goals have been set before start of the year. • Developing • Documentation that goals have been reviewed after each assessment. • Accomplished • Notation by specific objective if goal is being met.

  14. Goal Setting

  15. Assessments • Research indicates one of the most powerful strategies for improving student learning is the creation of frequent, common formative assessments by teachers who are working collaboratively to help students develop agreed upon knowledge and skills

  16. What we know Concerning Formative Assessments • We need to improve our process for analysis of formative assessment data • We need to improve our methods for intervening with students based on our formative results • We need to improve the quality of our formative assessments

  17. Formative assessments • Beginning • Formative assessments are planned prior to the beginning of the school year. • Developing • Formatives are correlated with the scope and sequence • Accomplished • Adjustment is made based on student performance identified in data analysis.

  18. Formative Assessment Calendar

  19. What we know Concerning PLC • Teachers need to share lessons and peer coach • Our teachers were collaborating but had no guide to lead or direct the collaboration • Meeting is one thing….collaborating is quite a challenge • The four key questions….

  20. CENTRAL QUESTIONS of CIA The GISD CIA process is designed to answer four questions. • What do we want each student to learn? • How will we know when each student has mastered the identified skills? • How will we respond when a student doesn’t learn? • How do we extend learning for students that have mastered the identified skills?

  21. Collaboration (PLC) • Beginning • Collaboration meetings scheduled before school begins • Developing • Team collaboration reflects: data analysis, instructional strategies, intervention, etc • Accomplished • Cross curriculum collaboration is occurring. Plan of Action is implemented.

  22. Collaboration Meeting

  23. What we know Concerning the elusive “district initiative” • Marzano’s high yield instructional strategies…our teachers had received training in these strategies and had THE book • Pockets of implementation • Random act of improvement

  24. High Yield Instructional Strategies • Beginning • High Yield Strategies are discussed as indicated on the team collaboration template. • Developing • Documentation of 2 strategies used per six weeks • Accomplished • Evidence of additional strategies used

  25. Marzano’s High-Yield Instructional Strategies

  26. Student Intervention • Beginning • Identify students/whole class/small group receiving interventions • Developing • Identify specific SEs/skills area of need for students receiving intervention • Accomplished • Evidence of reteaching/the how, the when/the results

  27. What we know Concerning Technology • Technology integration can serve as a catalyst for accelerating the learning • This had been a GISD “requirement” since the early 90s • Documented using Eduphoria

  28. Technology Integration • Beginning • Evidence of grade level/content area collaboration concerning technology integration • Developing • Documentation of 1 technology lesson per six weeks • Accomplished • Technology Lesson (s) selected as a modellesson and archived on GISD website

  29. Additional Information • Passing rate per grading period • Discipline Referrals • Parent Contacts • Teacher Attendance • Student Attendance

  30. CIA ProcessSkit

  31. THE CIA NOTEBOOK • Due date for CIA notebook set by principal • Usually by the end of the second six weeks for the six weeks prior. • Teacher turns in to principal • Principal reviews each notebook • Principal schedules meeting with teacher • Assistant Superintendent CIA - debriefs with principal • Issues, concerns, district perspective

More Related