220 likes | 327 Views
Drell-Yan study in CMS at 10 TeV, with 100 pb -1. Monika Jindal K.Mazumdar, D. Bourilkov , J.B. Singh. LHC Physcis meeting. 1. Motivation LEP and Tevatron experiments have established Electroweak part of Standard Model very well.
E N D
Drell-Yan study in CMS at 10 TeV, with 100 pb-1 Monika Jindal K.Mazumdar, D. Bourilkov , J.B. Singh LHC Physcis meeting 1
Motivation • LEP and Tevatron experiments have established Electroweak part • of Standard Model very well. • Confirmation of SM will be done at LHC using theoretically • well- understood processes like, Drell-Yan events (least amount • of QCD uncertainty). • With 100 pb-1 at 10 TeV, we can establish offline performance of • the detector and re-discover the SM from the low masses to the • kinematic limit; PDFs can also be tested at LHC in 100 pb -1 • scenario. • Earlier we had started exploring the DY low mass spectrum 20- • 80 GeV below the Z peak, but EWK group experts suggested to • explore the DY mass spectrum upto kinematic limit ~ 700 GeV.
List of Data Samples used 1. /Zmumu M20/Summer08 IDEAL V11 redigi v1/GEN-SIM-RECO • /WJets-madgraph/Summer08 IDEAL V11 redigi v1/AODSIM • /Ztautau M20/Summer08 IDEAL V11 redigi v1/AODSIM • 4. /TTJets-madgraph/Fall08 IDEAL V11 redigi v10/GEN-SIM-RECO • /QCD BCtoMu Pt20/Summer08 IDEAL V11 redigi v1/GEN-SIM-RECO • /QCD BCtoMu Pt30to50/Summer08 IDEAL V11 redigi v1/GEN-SIMRECO • /QCD BCtoMu Pt50to80/Summer08 IDEAL V11 redigi v2/GEN-SIMRECO • /QCD BCtoMu Pt80to120/Summer08 IDEAL V11 redigi v1/AODSIM • 9. /QCD BCtoMu Pt120to170/Summer08 IDEAL V11 redigi v1/AODSIM • /QCD BCtoMu Pt170/Summer08 IDEAL V11 redigi v1/AODSIM • /ZZ/Summer08 IDEAL V11 redigi v1/AODSIM • /WZ incl/Summer08 IDEAL V11 redigi v1/AODSIM • /WW/Summer08 IDEAL V11 redigi v1/AODSIM • /DYmumuM6to40/Summer08_PYTHIA_STARTUP_V5_redigi_v2/GEN-SIM-RECO LHC Physcis meeting 3
Generation Information X X • InclusivePPMuX has large scaling factor for 100 pb -1 and • InclusiveMuPt15 has large pt cut on muons. LHC Physcis meeting 4
PAT Filter used to select events with atleast two muons: {minLayer1Muons = cms.EDFilter("PATMuonMinFilter", src = cms.InputTag("selectedLayer1Muons"), minNumber = cms.uint32(2) } LHC Physcis meeting 5
Online Selection: Produced by Purdue group!! • Single Muon Trigger : HLT_Mu9 (single muon with pt > 9 GeV) • Double Muon Trigger : HLT_DoubleMu3 (2 muons pT > 3 GeV) • OR of single muon and dimuon trigger has better signal efficiency. Efficiency: Signal = 91%, Ztautau = 34%, Wjets=46%, ttjets = 54%, QCD = 23% LHC Physcis meeting 6
Offline Selection (1): atleast two global muons in the event. Invariant mass of dimuon system after Trigger and 2 global muon selection. QCD hadronic process is very dominating in the low mass region. LHC Physcis meeting 7
Selection 2 (a): pt of 2 leading muons > 10 GeV, 2(b): both muons must have |eta| < 2.4 Since the muons coming from heavy meson decays in QCD are relatively softer , so a pt cut > 10 is quite effective in reducing a large fraction of QCD. LHC Physcis meeting 8
Invariant mass of dimuons after pt and acceptance cut Efficiency of pt and eta cut : Signal = 81% , QCD = 4% , Wjets = 8% LHC Physcis meeting 9
Selection (3) : Muon ID selection : (recommended by Muon POG ) • Normalized chi2 of both leading muons < 10. • Number of valid hits > 11. • |d0μ1+ d0μ2| < 0.01 mm for both leading muons. LHC Physcis meeting 10
Signal muons: transverse impact parameter is expected to be • very small . But, for decay in flight muons coming from QCD impact parameter will be larger. • Muon POG recommends a cut on |d0| to be < 0.2 mm for • prompt muons. But d0 requires the knowledge of beam spot • position! At start up beam spot position may not be known very accurately . ==>Sum of transverse impact parameter is independent of the knowledge of the beam spot position . |d0μ1+ d0μ2| for two leading global muons in the event. LHC Physcis meeting 11
Optimization plot for sum of transverse impact parameter of two leading muons • Table shows the comparison of two variables. Since the behavior of two variables is almost same so it is better to choose Sum IP. • Sum IP has been optimized to be < 0.01cm LHC Physcis meeting 12
Selection (4): Isolation Condition (Tracker based) • Comparison of Relative and absolute tracker isolation variable in two • different cone sizes 0.3 and 0.4 • Relative Isolation variable is defined as ∑pt/ptμ and absolute isolation variable is ∑pt of tracks. Delta R = 0.4 Delta R = 0.3 • For a given signal efficiency , relative isolation variable has more • background rejection as compared to absolute one. LHC Physcis meeting 13
Comparison of relative Isolation variable in two cone sizes 0.3 & 0.4 • Relative Isolation variable gives more background rejection for a given signal efficiency in cone size 0.4 Isolation Variable ∑pT/pT optimized in delta R = 0.4 • Veto cone of 0.01 to exclude muon • tracks • Only tracks with pT > 1 GeV LHC Physcis meeting 14
Selection (5) : Both muons must be if opp charge. (6) : Angle between two muons must > 2.25 rad • Signal muons most of the time will be back to back. So the value • for the angle between two muons has been optmized to be • > 2.25 rad. LHC Physcis meeting 15
Invariant mass of dimuon system after all selection cuts After all selection cuts QCD is quite under control . Backgrounds have been reduced to a good extent keeping a good signal significance over backgrounds. LHC Physcis meeting 16
Relative Efficiencies of all selection cuts LHC Physcis meeting 17
No of events after each selection cut expected for 100 pb -1 LHC Physcis meeting 18
No of events expected in each mass bin for 100 pb -1 Total signal events = 47563 and total background expected for 100 pb -1 = 730 LHC Physcis meeting 19
Conclusions/Plans • Methods for efficient signal selection and background rejection have been • developed. • Various selection cut has been optimized to reduce backgrounds to good extent. • QCD mainly contributes to low Mll region, in high Mll region QCD is quite under control. • We are working for an analysis NOTE with CMSSW_2_2_X and will start soon • with CMSSW_3_1_X. LHC Physcis meeting 20
Absolute efficiencies of all selection cuts LHC Physcis meeting 22