1 / 16

Lidar observations of mixed-phase clouds

Lidar observations of mixed-phase clouds. Robin Hogan, Anthony Illingworth, Ewan O’Connor & Mukunda Dev Behera University of Reading UK Overview Enhanced algorithm for supercooled liquid water detection (Hogan et al. 2003, QJ in press)

hardesty
Download Presentation

Lidar observations of mixed-phase clouds

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Lidar observations ofmixed-phase clouds Robin Hogan, Anthony Illingworth, Ewan O’Connor & Mukunda Dev Behera University of Reading UK Overview • Enhanced algorithm for supercooled liquid water detection (Hogan et al. 2003, QJ in press) • Specular reflection from horizontally aligned plate crystals: A blessing or a curse? • Global distribution of stratiform supercooled water clouds from spaceborne lidar

  2. Small supercooled liquid droplets Large falling ice particles Lidar and mixed-phase clouds • Typical concs: ice 20 l-1, liquid droplets 20 000 l-1 • The same mass of water is ~10 times more optically thick as liquid than as ice, so lidar return also 10 times greater • By contrast, D6 dependence of radar makes the same mass of water ~1000 times more reflective as ice than as liquid! • Radiation calculations on 2 case studies suggest • When supercooled liquid present it is usually more radiatively important than the ice, even though tends to form thin layers • Crudely represented in current models

  3. Integrated lidar backscatter • The integrated backscatter through a cloud of optical depth of is approximately (Platt 1973): • k = extinction/backscatter ratio (18.75 sr for droplets) •  = multiple scattering factor (~0.7 for Chilbolton lidar ) • For large optical depth it reduces to  = (2k)-1 • If z1 and z2 encompass the 300 m around the strongest echo in a profile, we can identify thin liquid water layers with  greater than, say, 0.7

  4. Lidar echo • Example of supercooled water detection at Chilbolton Integrated lidar echo Microwave radiometer LWP

  5. Results for lidar 5° from zenith • Analysis of continuous Chilbolton CT75K lidar data from 2000 when looking off-zenith Frequency that cloud was observed Fraction of clouds containing supercooled water with >0.7

  6. Results for zenith pointing lidar • Analysis of Chilbolton lidar data from 1999 when pointing at zenith Enhanced occurrence between -10 and -20 °C: specular reflection from plates?

  7. Supercooled water in models • A year of data from the Met Office and ECMWF • Easy to calculate occurrence of supercooled water with  > 0.7 Prognostic ice and liquid+vapour variables Prognostic cloud water: ice/liquid diagnosed from temperature

  8. Specular reflection • Specular reflection from planar crystals can occur within 1° of zenith or nadir • Enhanced backscatter with no accompanying increase in extinction (very low k): radiative properties difficult to infer • Integrated backscatter in ice can exceed the asymptote corresponding to optically thick liquid cloud (recall ~(2k)-1) • Is locating plate crystals useful? Currently nadir viewing is being considered for spaceborne lidars Calipso and EarthCARE • To quantify, require lidar to be precisely at zenith: 20 days of data analysed so far at Chilbolton • Algorithm calculates integrated backscatter from 2 km up • Specular reflection deemed to occur if this integral is more than 1.05 times the asymptote for liquid water • Excess above this value is attributed to pixels with highest 

  9. Probable plate crystals

  10. Specularreflection: Results Pristine crystals are columns or needles ~-23°C • Around 20% of ice cloud profiles are strongly affected by specular reflection: enhancement > a factor of 2 • PDF of the maximum backscatter suggests that a further 30% of profiles are affected by specular reflection to a lesser extent • Big problem for interpreting backscatter measurements from space in terms of the radiative properties of ice clouds • Recommend operate spaceborne lidar a few degrees from nadir Pristine crystals are plates ~-9°C Fraction of clouds with specularly reflecting crystals

  11. Supercooled liquid waterfrom the LITE lidar on the space shuttle in 1994 • LITE took 45 hours of data 9-20 September 1994 • We use 532 nm channel: appeared most sensitive • Frequent changes in gain: only 10.5 hrs of data for which saturation level high enough to detect supercooled layers unambiguously • Even then liquid water often saturated receiver, and multiple scattering more uncertain from space, so integral method not reliable • 280 000 km of ground covered: equivalent to 160 days of surface observation!

  12. Occurrence versus height & latitude

  13. … versus temperature & latitude

  14. Comparison with Chilbolton Cloud fraction: much better coverage from space Lidar does not need to penetrate the cloudy boundary layer Liquid detection: very similar, esp. below -10°C

  15. Conclusions • Have shown that spaceborne lidar can identify supercooled liquid water clouds across the globe • Problems with LITE: saturation & severe multiple scattering • We will use long-term spaceborne lidar data: IceSat: launched 12 Jan 2003: High polar orbit, 2 wavelengths Calipso: launch in Dec 2004: Includes depolarisation channel

More Related