1 / 34

output

cos w H t. output. + -. Decision Circuit. . r(t). cos w L t. Probability of error in coherent FSK receiver given as:. P e,BFSK =. Coherent BFSK Detector. 2 correlators fed with local coherent reference signals difference in correlator outputs compared with threshold to

Download Presentation

output

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. cos wHt output + - Decision Circuit  r(t) cos wLt Probability of error in coherent FSK receiver given as: Pe,BFSK = Coherent BFSK Detector • 2 correlators fed with local coherent reference signals • difference in correlator outputs compared with threshold to • determine binary value

  2. Matched Filter fH Envelope Detector + - r(t)  output Tb Decision Circuit Envelope Detector Matched Filter fL Pe,BFSK, NC = Non-coherent Detection of BFSK • operates in noisy channel without coherent carrier reference • pair of matched filters followed by envelope detector • - upper path filter matched to fH (binary 1) • - lower path filter matched to fL (binary 0) • envelope detector output sampled at kTb compared to threshold Average probability of error in non-coherent FSK receiver:

  3. I-channel Z1(T) (.)2 ( 2/T) cos wHt + +  ( 2/T) sin wHt Z2(T) (.)2 + - output r(t) Decision Circuit Q-channel  Z3(T) I-channel (.)2 ( 2/T) cos wLt + +  ( 2/T) sin wLt Z4(T) (.)2 Q-channel Non-coherent Quadrature BFSK Detector

  4. Tutorial • Derive minimum frequency spacing (f2 – f1) for  • Non-coherent detection (arbitrary phase ) • Coherent detection

  5. Type of continuous phase FSK (CPFSK) • Spectrally efficient • Constant envelope • Good BER performance • Self-synchronizing capability • Requires coherent detection Minimum Shift Keying ( fast FSK)

  6. FSK modulation index • minimum frequency spacing (bandwidth) for 2 FSK signals • to be coherently orthogonal • minimum bandwidth that allows orthogonal detection kFSK= MSK modulation index is kMSK= 0.5  FMSK= Minimum Shift Keying

  7. Minimum Shift Keying • MSK can be thought of as special case of OQPSK • uses half-sinusoidal pulses instead of baseband rectangular pulses • arch shaped pulse of period = 2Tb • modify OQPSK equations using half-sine pulses for N-bit stream • several variations of MSK exist with different basic pulse shapes • e.g. • - use only positive ½ sinusoids • - use alternating negative & positive ½ sinusoids • all variations are CPFSK that use different techniques to achieve • spectral efficiency

  8. sMSK(t) = • mI(t) & mQ(t)are bipolar bit streams (1) that feedI& Q • arms of the modulator - each arm fed at Rb/2 • mIi(t) = ith bit of mI(t), the even bits of m(t) • mQi(t) = ith bit of mQ(t), the odd bits of m(t) ½ sine pulse given by p(t) = m(t) = ±1 bipolar bit stream p(t – 2iTb-Tb)sin(2πfct) Transmitted MSK signal (OQPSK variant) p(t – 2iTb)cos(2πfct) +

  9. MSK examplewith ωcT=2.5π; ω1T=2π, ω2T=3π d0 d1 d2 d3 d4 d5 d6 d7 d0 d2 d4 d6 d1 d3 d5 d7

  10. MSK examplewith ωcT=4π; ω1T=3.5π, ω2T=4.5π d0 d1 d2 d3 d4 d5 d6 d7 d0 d2 d4 d6 d1 d3 d5 d7

  11. sMSK(t) = • k= 0 or depending on whether mI(t) = +1 to -1 • sMSK(t) has constant amplitude • to ensure phase continuity at bit interval  selectfc = ; n integer • fc - and • fc + MSK waveform - as a special case of CPFSK MSK is FSK signal with binary signaling frequencies given by • phase of MSK varies linearly over Tb

  12. Phase Continuity of MSK h = ½ θ(t) = θ(0) ± 0 ≤ t ≤ T θ(t) can take on only 2 values at odd or even multiples of T t =even multiple of T θ(T) - θ(0)= πor 0 t = odd multiple of Tθ(T) - θ(0)= ± π/2 assuming θ(0) = 0

  13. π π/2 0 -π/2 -π θ(t) - (0) 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 2T 4T 6T t Phase Trellis: path depicts θ(t) corresponding to a binary sequence • for h = ½ ΔF = Rb/4 • minimum ΔF for two binary FSK signals • to be coherently orthogonal • e.g. if Rb = 100Mbps  = ΔF = 25MHz

  14. Orthonormal basis for MSK as 1(t) = 2(t) = 0 ≤ t ≤ T 0 ≤ t ≤ T bi θ(0) θ(T) s1 s2 then s(t) = s1(t)1(t) + s2(t)2(t) with ‘0’ 0 -π/2 ‘1’ π -π/2 s1= -T ≤ t ≤ T ‘0’ π π/2 ‘1’ 0 π/2 s2= = 0 ≤ t ≤ 2T =

  15. p(t) = PMSK(f) = MSK Power Spectrum • RF power spectrum obtained by frequency shifting |F{p(t)}|2 • F{} = fourier transform • p(t)= MSK baseband pulse shaping function (1/2 sin wave) Normalized PSD for MSK is given as

  16. PSD of MSK & QPSK signals 10 0 -10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60 QPSK, OQPSK MSK normalized PSD (dB) fc fc+0.5Rb fc+Rb fc+1.5Rb fc+2Rb • MSK spectrum • (1) has lower side lobes than QPSK (amplitude) • (2) has wider side lobes than QPSK (frequency) • 99% MSK power is within bandwidthB = 1.2/Tb • 99% QPSK power is within bandwidth B = 8/Tb

  17. MSK • QPSK signaling is bandwidth efficient, achieving 2 bps per Hz of channel bandwidth. However, the abrupt changes results in large side lobes. Away from the main lobe of the signal band, the power spectral distribution falls off only as ω-2 . • MSK achieves the same bandwidth efficiency. With constant envelope (no discontinuity in phase), the power spectral distribution falls off as ω-4 away from the main signal band.

  18. MSK spectrum • MSK has faster roll-off due to smoother pulse function • Spectrum of MSK main lobe > QPSK main lobe • - using 1st null bandwidth  MSK is spectrally less efficient • MSK has no abrupt phase shifts at bit transitions • - bandlimiting MSK signal doesn’t cause envelop to cross zero • - envelope is  constant after bandlimiting • small variations in envelope removed using hardlimiting • - does not raise out of band radiation levels • constant amplitude  non-linear amplifiers can be used • continuous phase is desirable for highly reactive loads • simple modulation and demodulation circuits

  19. mI(t) _ + x(t) SMSK(t) + + y(t) mQ(t)  + + cos(2fct)   cos(t/2T) MSK Transmitter (i) cos(2fct)cos(t/2T) 2 phase coherent signals atfc ¼R (ii) Separate 2 signals with narrow bandpass filters (iii) Combined to formI & Q carrier components x(t), y(t) (iv) Mix and sum to yield SMSK(t) = x(t)mI(t) + y(t)mQ(t) mI(t) & mQ(t) = even & odd bit streams

  20. Coherent MSK Receiver • (i) SMSK(t) split & multiplied by locally generated • x(t) & y(t) (I & Q carriers) • (ii) mixer outputs are integrated over 2T & dumped • (iii) integrate & dump output fed to decision circuit every 2T • input signal level compared to threshold  decide 1 or 0 • output data streams correspond to mI(t) & mQ(t) • mI(t) & mQ(t) are offset & combined to obtain demodulated signal • *assumes ideal channel – no noise, interference

  21. SMSK(t) Coherent MSK Receiver Threshold Device mI(t) t = 2(k+1)T x(t) y(t) Threshold Device mQ(t) t = 2(k+1)T

  22. Gaussian MSK • Gaussian pulse shaping to MSK • smoothens phase trajectory of MSK signal  • over time, stabilizes instantaneous frequency variations • results in significant additional reduction of • sidelobe levels • GMSK detection can be coherent (like MSK) • or noncoherent (like FSK)

  23. Gaussian MSK • premodulation pulse shaping filter used to filter NRZ data • - converts full response message signal into partial response scheme • full response baseband symbols occupy Tb • partial responsetransmitted symbols span several Tb • - pulse shaping doesn’t cause pattern’s averaged phase trajectory to deviate from simple MSK trajectory

  24. Gaussian MSK • GMSKs main advantages are • power efficiency - from constant envelope (non-linear amplifiers) • excellent spectral efficiency • pre-modulation filtering introduces ISI into transmitted signal • if B3dbTb > 0.5  degradation is not severe • B3dB= 3dB bandwidth of Gaussian Pulse Shaping Filter • Tb= bit duration = baseband symbol duration • irreducible BER caused by partial response signaling is the • cost for spectral efficiency & constant envelope • GMSK filter can be completely defined from B3dB Tb • - customary to define GMSK by B3dBTb

  25. Impulse responseof pre-modulation Gaussian filter : hG(t) = transfer function of pre-modulation Gaussian Filter is given by HG(f) =  is related toB3dB by  = Gaussian MSK

  26. Impact of B3dBTb • (i) ReducingB3dBTb : spectrum becomes more compact (spectral efficiency) • causes sidelobes of GMSK to fall off rapidly • B3dBTb = 0.5  2nd lobe peak is 30dB below main lobe • MSK 2nd peak lobe is 20dB below main lobe • MSK  GMSK with B3dBTb =  • (ii) increases irreducible error rate (IER)due to ISI • ISI degradation caused by pulse shaping increases • however - mobile channels induce IER due to mobile’s velocity • if GMSK IER < mobile channel IER  no penalty for using GMSK

  27. 0 -10 -20 -30 -40 -50 -60 BTb =  (MSK) BTb = 1.0 BTb = 0.5 BTb = 0.2 0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 (f-fc)T PSD of GMSK signals • Increasing BTb • reduces signal spectrum • results in temporal spreading and distortion

  28. RF bandwidth containing % power as fraction of Rb e.g. for BT = 0.2  99% of the power is in the bandwidth of 1.22Rb • [Ish81] BER degradation from ISI caused by GMSK filtering is • minimal at B3dBTb= 0.5887 • degradation in required Eb/N0 = 0.14dB compared to case of no ISI

  29. Pe = BER of GMSK for AWGN channel • [Mur81] shown to perform within 1dB of optimal MSK with B3dBTb = 0.25 • since pulse shaping causes ISI  Peis function of B3dBTb Pe= bit error probability  is constant related to B3dBTb • B3dBTb = 0.25   = 0.68 • B3dBTb =    = 0.85 (MSK)

  30. Gaussian LPF FM Transmitter RF GMSK Output NRZ bits GMSK Transmitter Block Diagram GMSK Transmitter • (i) pass mNRZ(t) through Gaussian base band filter (see figure below) • - mNRZ(t) = NRZ bit stream • output of Gaussian filter passed to FM modulator • used in digital implementation for • - Global System for Mobile (GSM) • - US Cellular Digital Packet Data (CDPD) • (ii) alternate approach is to use standard I/Q modulator

  31. demodulated signal  /2 modulated IF input signal loop filter Q IF LO I  /2  clock recovery • GMSK Receiver • RF GMSK signal can be detected using • (i) orthogonal coherent detectors (block diagram) • (ii) simple non-coherent detectors (e.g. standard FM discriminators) (i) GMSK Receiver Block Diagram-orthogonal coherent detectors

  32. carrier recovery using De Budas method for(similar to Costas loop) • S’(t) = output of frequency doubler that contains 2 discrete frequency • components • - divide S’(t) by four: S’(t) /4 • - equivalent to PLL with frequency doubler

  33. D Q C D Q C D Q C D Q C modulated IF input signal D Q C clock recovery demodulated signal D C Q loop filter VCO • De Budasmethod implemented using digital logic • 2 D flip flops (DFF) act as quadrature product demodulator • XORs act as based band multipliers • mutually orthogonal reference carriers generated using 2 DFFs • VCOcenter frequency set to 4  fc ( fc = carrier center frequency) Logic Circuit for GMSK demodulation

  34. Detecting GMSK signal by sampling output of FM demodulator is a non-optimal, effective method • e.g. • Assume 0.25GMSK: B3dbTb= 0.25 & Rb = 270kbps • then • Tb = Rb-1= 3.7us • B3dB = 0.25/Tb = 67.567kHz • Occupied Spectrum - 90% power 0.57Rb = 153.9kHz • - use table

More Related