1 / 20

A PET STUDY IN LANGUAGE

A PET STUDY IN LANGUAGE. Presentation for Psych 526. Positron Emission Tomography (PET). PET detects pairs of gamma rays emitted indirectly by a positron-emitting radionuclide (tracer). The concentration of tracer  regional glucose uptake  tissue metabolic activity or neurochemical activity

hayley
Download Presentation

A PET STUDY IN LANGUAGE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. A PET STUDY IN LANGUAGE Presentation for Psych 526

  2. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) • PET detects pairs of gamma rays emitted indirectly by a positron-emitting radionuclide (tracer). • The concentration of tracer  regional glucose uptake  tissue metabolic activity or neurochemical activity • Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) • Neurotransmitter receptor ligand (opiate, GABA, dopamine and serotonin receptor)

  3. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) • Animation! (http://www.sumanasinc.com/webcontent/animations/content/positronemissiontomography.html)

  4. Positron Emission tomography (PET) • Indirect • can measure metabolism or hemodynamics • can also map brain biochemistry in vivo • Mildly invasive • injection of radioactive substance • Spatial resolution • good (5 mm- 1 cm) • Temporal resolution • poor (seconds-minutes) • Limitations in experimental paradigms • Very expensive

  5. Psych 526 NEURAL RESPONSES TO THE PRODUCTION AND COMPREHENSION OF SYNTAX IN IDENTICAL UTTERANCES Peter Indefrey, Frauke Hellwig, Hans Herzog, Rudiger J Seitz, and Peter Hagoort

  6. Big Question Is there a shared syntactic system between language production and language comprehension?

  7. Anatomy Quiz! A. Left Rolandic operculumB. Left inferior frontal gyrusC. BA 44D. Broca’s area: Pars triangularis PET (Indefrey et al, 2001)

  8. Hemodynamic activation for syntactic processing Black square: passive reading Black diamond: structure judgment of auditory input Black symbols: syntactic violations versus correct sentences Pink symbols: semantic or pragmatic violation versus correct sentences Triangle: Jabberwocky versus a pseudo-word list Circle: Jabberwocky versus rest Square: Syntactic prose versus rest Kaan & Swaab, 2002

  9. Methods • 18 right-handed adults (20-36 yr old) • Tasks: • Twelve PET scans per subject. (ABCABCABCABC) (ABC is the random order of SNW) • Production • Comprehension (matching/mismatching response) • Anatomical localization procedure • The overlap of BA 44 of at least 5 of 10 postmortem brains. • Three-dimensional reconstructions of the 10 brains based on MR scans • Determine the number of brains that agreed in the assignment of BA 44 for every voxel

  10. Stimuli • Three conditions (SNW) • Full sentence; NP+V; Sequence of word • Two actions: launch/go to • Three objects: masculine/feminine/neuter • Three colors: red, blue and green

  11. Behavioral Results • Production • Comprehension All subjects gave 99.99% correct responses

  12. Regional Cerebral Blood Flow (rCBF) • Production of sentences vs. single words • One part of caudal BA 44 extending to Rolandic operculum. Yellow: Left BA 44 of reference brain (same as Indefrey et al., 2001)

  13. Regional Cerebral Blood Flow (rCBF) • Production • S and NP > W • No diff b/w S and NP • No effect of presentation rate • No diff among three conditions in comprehension task.

  14. Other results • Stronger activation of motor-related areas in production conditions • Stronger bilateral temporal activations in the comprehension conditions

  15. Conclusion • BA44 and the adjacent Rolandic operculum is involved in some aspect of syntactic encoding. • The activation patterns of Broca’s area may greatly differ b/w production and comprehension with identical syntactic structures.

  16. Discussion • No sensitive region to syntactic complexity in comprehension • Possible candidates: left inferior frontal gyrus, left or bilateral temporal activation areas. (Friederci et al, 2000; Wong et al, 1999; Kuperberg et al, 2000) • Relative syntactically simple sentences? • Particular role of Broca’s area only for syntactically complex sentences with long antecedent-gap distances (Cooke et al., 2002). • Inteference of semantic processing (lexical semantic strategy)? • Stronger focus on semantic processing in agrammatic aphasia (Haggoort et al, 2003) • Stronger activation in “syntactic” system in the presence of poor semantic cues (Friederici et al, 2000)

  17. More challenges to production task! • Bonnie: • How much syntactic planning is there really for putting an adjective and a noun together (in NP condition)? • Cindy: • Paraphrasing the events ("Ok, so the red square launched the blue ellipse, that means I need to say: Square, Red, Ellipse, Blue, Launch") • Erin: • Rehearsal strategy?

  18. That’s why you didn’t see the diff… • Aileen • The conditions used for the task were in the order of ABCABCABC.....participants would probably catch on. • Also how many variations can one generate when the objects performed only 2 specific actions on one another: go next to or go set another object in motion...not many. • Scott: • So, although they set out to look at similarities and differences between production & comprehension, this task obviously wasn't effective at that.

  19. Suggestions to the authors • Bonnie: Why wouldn’t they use sentences for which syntactic processing actually makes a difference in the meaning? Of course, if you can guess the meaning without the need for syntax you might not use it. • Aileen: Choose a singing task as control. One would expect the Rolandic operculum to light up despite individual variations in anatomy. • Xuefei: It is kind of weird to make a conclusion (assumption?) that syntactic production and comprehension are located within the same brain regions (Broca’s area?).

  20. Any other thoughts?

More Related