190 likes | 235 Views
Learn how genotypes are processed and updated for Holstein, Jersey, and Brown Swiss animals with and without traditional evaluations. Stay informed about the data and evaluation flow, genetic processing standards, continuous updates, and common conflicts resolved in the lab QC.
E N D
Genotyped Holstein by run * Animals with traditional evaluation ** Animals with no traditional evaluation
Genotyped Jersey by run * Animals with traditional evaluation ** Animals with no traditional evaluation
Genotyped Brown Swiss by run * Animals with traditional evaluation ** Animals with no traditional evaluation
Data & Evaluation Flow AI organizations, breed associations nominations samples evaluations ??? Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA Dairy producers samples samples genotypes DNA laboratories
Genotype Processing • 2,000 New Genotypes a month • Four labs • GeneSeek • Genetic Visions • DNA LandMarks • GIVF
Genotype Processing: Nomination • All animals should be nominated by the time sample reaches lab • Goal: Parents and Grandparents on every genotyped animal • Minimum: Valid ID
Genotype Processing: Edits • 62 edits that the genotypes must pass to be added to the database • Most common reasons a genotype fails • Low call rate • Parent / Progeny conflict • Possible split embryo / twin • Wrong gender • Breed Check • Switched samples
Continuous Updates • Pedigree changes update genotype usability daily • Harmonization with breed association important to maintain usability • Blanking a genotyped dam will make the genotype unusable • No automatic receipt of foreign pedigree updates
Low call rate • 80% on X chromosome • 90% on autosomal chromosomes (43,382) • Labs generally do not send genotypes with low call rates
Parent Progeny Conflict • Sire / Dam conflict • > 200 SNP conflicts • Sire / dam proposed if genotyped • Sire conflict - young animals from mixed flush • Sire conflicts represent $50,000 genotype cost
split embryo / identical twin / clone • <1000 SNP differences considered identical • 98% similar, accounts for genotyping errors • Stored in clone table if valid • Animals registered as ETS or ETN (automatic) • Otherwise verification must come from requester
Wrong Gender • > 50 heterozygous SNP on X (not male) • < 50 heterozygous SNP on X (not female) • Homozygous X female • Common ancestor (source of X)
Source of X Bellwood BW Marshall Mara Elegant Patron Tanya Mary Jeff Mark Sam Sue Erin Patron 12144058 14860763
Breed Check • 622 SNP • Nearly monomorphic in 1 breed and have fewer than 30% of animals homozygous for that allele in another breed • An error when a higher number of conflicts for the reported breed than for another breed • > 10 SNP conflicts reported to requester, but remains usable • Higher conflicts for foreign animals
Switched Samples • Sample pair with reversed parents • Switched at the lab (rare) • Switched at the farm
Conflicts to Requester • Genotype conflicts reported to the requester immediately • Genotype remains stored in AIPL database as an unusable genotype until conflict is resolved • 2-3 days to fix conflicts before cutoff • Once a month all conflicts remaining in the system are sent to requesters
Lab QC • SNP that have call rate <90% • SNP that have high parent-progeny conflicts • SNP that deviate from HW equilibrium • Labs have the opportunity to recluster genotypes
Closing thoughts • Currently 477 animals with failed or conflicted genotypes • Big increase in volume when 3K becomes available