140 likes | 239 Views
Developing quality in VPL Education and Training Service Centre (ETSC) in Iceland. RPL Biennale, Rotterdam – April 2014. Education and Training Service Centre (ETSC).
E N D
Developingquality in VPLEducation and Training Service Centre (ETSC) in Iceland RPL Biennale, Rotterdam – April 2014
EducationandTrainingServiceCentre (ETSC) • OwnedbyTheIcelandicFederation of Labor, Confederation of IcelandicEmployers, Federation of State and Municipal Employees, Association of Local Authorities in Iceland and the Ministry of Finance • Target group: People on the labour market who have not completed education on Upper Secondary level • The form is a Corporation. Non-profit. • Contractwithandfinancedby the Ministry of Education, ScienceandCulturesince 2003. • Development of VPL – one of the maintasks • Qualityandmethodology of VPL • EducationandTraining fund allocatesfinancing for specificprojectsexecutedby LLL-centresaround the country
The VPL system • 182.000 peopleon the labour market • 1/3 has not completedUpperSecondarySchool = RPL maintargetgroup • 2.172 induvidualsvalidatedin 2007 – 2013 • About 400 peryearfrom 2010 • 37 years = mediumage of participants • Centralizedcoordinationthroughcontractswith the ETSC • ProjectsaremanagedbyLifelonglearningcentresaround the country • Financingthrough the Educationandtraining Fund (Statebudget) • VPL is mainlyagainststandardsin formal curricula, butalsopilotprojectsagainstjobstandards (noexistingcurricula)
Qualityassuranceproceedure • ETSC providestraining, adviceandsupportmaterial. Gathers statistics. • Standardslinkedto the European Quality Mark (EQM) areindevelopment • EQM is usedbythe ETSC for qualityassurance of thedelivery of courses • Standards for careerguidancearebeingtested • TheNordicproject – Qualityinvalidationvaluableinput for making of qualitystandards for RPL
Thequalitytrianglefor VPL Methodology European guidelines Nordic Quality model Exsperience Results Individual Labor market Society/community Financing and Cost Society/state Labormarket VPL
Methodology • Pilotprojectsin 2004 - 2007 • Lawandregulation: • Definedprocess– termslinkedtofinancing/contracts for individualprojects • Careerguidance, groupprocess • Centraldatabase for informationonprojectresultsandstandardsused (screeningtools) • Developmentalmeetingswithproject managers • Theindividualinthecenter • Key questions we often use: what effect does this (change, action, outcome) have on the individuals • Good model to start talking about quality – and reflect practices
Financingandcostt Focus • Decisionsonfinancingarebasedonclearbenefits for the state/labour market andvalidity of results • Centralgathering of informationonresultsandcost • Totalcostperindividual2013: • Validation: 1.294 euro • Guidance: 284 euro Benefits • Morepeoplewithinthetargetgroupcomplete formal education • Visibility of competences • Moreflexibilityonthelabor market • Increasedcompetencedevelopment
Results • Measuringeffectiveness • A survey among those who have completed validation • February – March 2014 • Focus on results for: • Individual • Labour market • Society/community • Number of participants and the number of respondents • 751 asked • 305 did not answer • 446 answered • 59,4 % response
Howeasyorhardwasittorevealyourcompetencesin the evaluationinterviews?
Howfairorunfairwaswere the resultsyoureceivedfrom the validationprocess?
Howimportant/unimportantwas the role of the careercounselorin the validationprocessinyouropinion?
What is yoursituationafteryoucompletedthe validationprocess?