1 / 17

Defining a Community Change Agenda for the Future: Applying Lessons from Recent History

Defining a Community Change Agenda for the Future: Applying Lessons from Recent History. Tom Dewar and Anne Kubisch Roundtable on Community Change The Aspen Institute November 3, 2009. The Aspen Roundtable: Voices from the Field.

hunter
Download Presentation

Defining a Community Change Agenda for the Future: Applying Lessons from Recent History

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Defining a Community Change Agenda for the Future: Applying Lessons from Recent History Tom Dewar and Anne Kubisch Roundtable on Community Change The Aspen Institute November 3, 2009

  2. The Aspen Roundtable:Voices from the Field • Combination of program documents, evaluations, and interviews/focus groups • Voices 1 (1997): Description of comprehensiveness, community building, process-product tension • Voices 2 (2002): Emphasis on capacity building and connections

  3. Place-Based Efforts Are Here for the Foreseeable Future Voices from the Field III: Refers to 40 community change efforts over 20 years • $1 billion in philanthropic investment over the last two decades • More than $10 billion in public sector investment • Future: Stimulus package, Neighborhood Stabilization Program, Choice Neighborhoods, Promise Neighborhoods, transit funding, green jobs

  4. Community Change Efforts Vary: The general model

  5. How we will present the findings • Three levels: • Individual level • Community level: Includes both physical/economic change and community capacity building • Policy and system level • General findings • Some keys to success • Unresolved problems, challenges for the future

  6. Individual-Level Outcomes:People-oriented strategies • Put into place “best practices” • Outcomes seen for the individuals who received the services • Many focused on EITC uptake (low-hanging fruit)

  7. Community-Level Outcomes:Type I,Physical/economic-oriented strategies • Major physical revitalization causes real change in communities • Large and/or mission-driven CDCs have effectively balanced physical with other strategies; small CDCs can’t seem to get to scale • Developers (non-profit and for-profit) are efficient housing producers and have a growing track record re: social, environmental and civic community well-being

  8. Community-Level Outcomes:Type II,Increased community capacity • New leadership emerged • New connections were made across community residents • Many organizations’ capacities were built • Community “civic” capacity increased: organized, planful, stronger voice city-wide

  9. Data: collect, analyze and consider implications of data about the community Inclusive community visioning and planning process: goals to work toward, ability to take advantage of opportunities, aim for alignment Locally-based broker/mediator: convener, organizer, network builder, policy advocate, focus on alignment Community-Level Outcomes:Common strategies to build community capacity

  10. Policy and Systems Change • Many attracted and leveraged new funding • Partnerships between communities and powerful allies triggered system responsiveness • Parallel policy and advocacy track to support community agendas

  11. Keys to success: Some big themes • Clarity about goals, definition of success and theory of change • Intentionality • Proportionality • Valuing community capacity building • Brokering and alignment

  12. Keys to success: Effective roles of foundations • Use all philanthropic “capitals:” • Financial: grants and investments • Technical: access to national research and practices • Civic: convening, helping to set the agenda, taking on policy and systems change • Moral: embracing equity and empowerment • Reputational: ability to take risks • Intellectual: learning and creating a learning culture • Not all foundations should do CCI-type work • The role of national foundations should be revisited: Local work? Field-building? Policy?

  13. Individual Level: Unresolved problems and challenges for the future • How to attain population-level change through human investment strategies? • What is the added-value of delivering good services through a community change effort? • What do we mean by “synergy”? Is co-location good enough? • What do we mean by “overcoming funding silos”? What does it look like in practice?

  14. Community Level (Physical/economic): Unresolved problems and challenges for the future • Can community efforts succeed in promoting economic development (beyond commercial development)? • Who, aside from private developers, should do physical development? • How to do development without displacement? • Can mixed income work, and be stable?

  15. Community Level (Capacity): Unresolved problems and challenges for the future • How to take advantage of new forms of organizing that is reaching new and different audiences? • Community capacity-building requires staff and funding? Who will pay? • How to strengthen cross-sector alignment (public, private and community) on behalf of the community? • How to improve the evidence that increased community capacity results in improved “hard” outcomes?

  16. Policy Level: Unresolved problems and challenges for the future • What does community level work have to do with system change? How to maximize the community-system change link? • How will the current economic crisis affect all of this work? • Racial segregation is increasing: how to tackle the race/place/poverty knot?

  17. Thank you

More Related