300 likes | 413 Views
Black Entrepreneurship and Informal Housing. South Africa. Laws Inhibiting Black Entrepreneurship. Colonial Era : Serfdom? Apartheid : Separation State monopolies. Cultural Factors Inhibiting Black Entrepreneurship. Traditional/Rural sanctions against wealth accumulation
E N D
Black EntrepreneurshipandInformal Housing South Africa
Laws Inhibiting Black Entrepreneurship • Colonial Era : Serfdom? • Apartheid : Separation • State monopolies
Cultural Factors Inhibiting Black Entrepreneurship • Traditional/Rural sanctions against wealth accumulation • Considered “legitimate target” of theft and violence • Police raids and intimidation • For black graduates, civil service is a safer choice
Seven Categories of Black Entrepreneurship • Listed Companies : “Black Chips” • Heavy ownership by unions • Formed Preemptively by white companies • Spinoffs of less profitable operations • Joint venture by industry to create a competitor
Seven Categories of Black Entrepreneurship • Potential Listed companies • Often politically connected • Often Joint Ventures with foreign companies
Seven Categories of Black Entrepreneurship • Portfolio Investment Trusts • Also heavily union funded • Buy companies as well as stocks
Seven Categories of Black Entrepreneurship • Black Women Investors • Same as PITs, but funds raised from women • Possible rural focus : agriculture, tourism
Seven Categories of Black Entrepreneurship • Medium, Small, and Micro Enterprises • 200 or fewer employees • Most formed during apartheid, to provide services to black townships • Sectors: taxi, retail, construction, garment manufacture • Only 20% are growing businesses
Seven Categories of Black Entrepreneurship • Informal Sector • Often food-related • Low barriers to entry • Immigrant competitors
Seven Categories of Black Entrepreneurship • “Political Entrepreneurs” • Often a partnership with foreign investors • Partner brings no business experience • Qualifications : prison time • Sectors : franchising, technical contractors • Some supported by USAID
Top Down vs Bottom Up • Top Down : replace white managers, owners, directors on a “quota” basis • Problem : corruption • Problem : whites still needed for technical functions • 1994 example : 14,000 accountants (65 black accountants)
Top Down vs Bottom Up • Bottom Up : government support for the informal sector • Problem : hyper-competitive environment • Problem : insufficient education to manage a larger enterprise
Top Down vs Bottom Up • Editorial • “Expand the pie” • What will it take to attract foreign employers? • How can a small or medium enterprise increase its employment?
Cato ManorHistory • 1930s partitioned by Mr. Cato, who sold lots to Indians • After WW2, Indians sublet to black tenants • 1949 violence between tenants and Indians • 1950s / early 60s bulldozed, zoned for white development
Cato ManorHistory • Development halted by CMRA, an organization of former Indian owners • Unoccupied until late 1980s, when squatters moved in • 1990s influx : close to city center • 1990s influx : ANC stronghold safe from Inkatha - ANC violence
Cato Manor Development Association • Concentrated building efforts on unoccupied land • Mistrusted in squatter settlements due to corruption • CMDA would lose jobs if project complete • Embezzlement, selling lot numbers, nepotism
The Taxi Wars • Taxis initially reluctant to service area • Profitable route due to short runs • Taxi service taken over by 15-20 former ANC guerillas • Extortion of residents for “protection” • Driven out by former taxi outfit and locals • All community structures destroyed
“In Situ” Upgrading of Informal Settlements • Applying a Brazilian model to Cape Town • Both: cities are largely formal with peripheral informal settlements • Both: technical professionals available for GIS implementation • Brazil: informal settlements built of more permanent materials
Bureaucracy • Black and white councils (transition period) • City, metropolitan, and provincial governments • Duplicate political and administrative positions • Delays of 18 months to 4 years • Reluctance to adopt the “In Situ” concept
GIS • Allows rapid updates in dynamic situations • Design access network for foot traffic • Visual demonstration for those in flood area • Existence of a “formal” plan reduces resistance by neighbors • Lot number on a plan gives feeling of security to residents