220 likes | 394 Views
Introduction. ROI on your surveys not directly attributable to your survey expendituresyou may be validating prior workWays of using ACSI data for ROI purposesIdentify user behavior that explicitly shows your site's valueIdentify data that shows how you can improve your site to increase its valu
E N D
1. Measuring ROI on ACSI Surveys Tim Evans
Social Security Administration
Office of Electronic Services
tim.evans@ssa.gov
2. Introduction ROI on your surveys not directly attributable to your survey expenditures—you may be validating prior work
Ways of using ACSI data for ROI purposes
Identify user behavior that explicitly shows your site’s value
Identify data that shows how you can improve your site to increase its value
Identify and focus your (limited) resource priorities
3. SSA and ACSI Began Q1/04
Four current surveys
Main site
FAQ’s site
Retirement Planner site
Internet Social Security Benefit Application--ISBA (not published)
Two more surveys planned
Business Services On-line (employer wage reporting)
Disability (largest single group of surveyed visitors say they came for disability info)
4. SSA ROI for ACSI Surveys--Summary Main survey shows high value + return on 2003 site redesign
FAQ survey shows clear reduction in use of high-cost support channels as direct result of FAQ’s availability
Retirement Planner survey shows high value of Planner + the opportunity to focus our resources
ISBA Survey helps clarify resource priorities in limited-budget environment
5. Main Site Survey, Q3/04http://www.socialsecurity.gov Overall 75
Content 80
Functionality 76
Look & Feel 79
Navigation 73
Search 74
Site Performance 83
6. Compare to ForeSee Results Benchmarks Overall Satisfaction: +5 vis a vis Q2/04 Gov’t benchmark; +4 vis a vis overall
Look & Feel: +4/+3
Content: +2/+2
Navigation: +5/+3
7. 2003 Site Redesign Site-wide adoption of CSS Style Sheets for common look & feel (colors, fonts, etc.)
Added common header with top nav-links
Primarily implemented via common DreamWeaver template for easy propagation site wide
Context: ~80 SSA webmasters with central, but informal governance
8. SSA FAQ’s Survey, Q3/04http://ssa-custhelp.ssa.gov/cgi-bin/ssa.cfg/php/enduser/entry.php Overall Score 74
Content 81
Functionality 77
Look & Feel 79
Navigation 75
Search 75
Site Performance 84
9. Custom Questions Results Reveal ROI--#1 If there were no FAQ’s, how would you have contacted Social Security to ask your question? (N=1273)
Send e-mail 16%
Browse web site 8
Call 800 number 39
Call local SSA office 22
Visit local SSA office 10
Write SSA 1
Would not have contacted SSA 4
10. Custom Questions Results Reveal ROI--#2 After reading our answer(s), what do you plan to do next? (N=487)
Nothing; question answered 36%
Nothing; question not answered 4
Send SSA e-mail 6
Call SSA 800 number 14
Call SSA local office 9
Visit local SSA office 22
Try different question 4
Look elsewhere on site 3 Question re-worded, 8/25/04, to better focus it; this explains lower number of respondents. Prior wording had less precise answer choices, but trend was the generally clearQuestion re-worded, 8/25/04, to better focus it; this explains lower number of respondents. Prior wording had less precise answer choices, but trend was the generally clear
11. Key Comparisons for 2 Questions Send SSA e-mail 16% 6% -62%
Call SSA 800 number 39 14 -65
Call SSA local office 22 9 -59
Visit local SSA office 10 22 +120 Refer to Pew Study to be discussed laterRefer to Pew Study to be discussed later
12. ROI—Reduction Use of High-Cost Support Channels Forester Research Estimates Cost of Services
Knowledge-Based Self Service: $1.17/incident
Telephone support: $33/incident
E-mail support: $10/incident
SSA Results, shown by ACSI data
65% reduction in calls to 800 number
59% reduction in calls to local office
62% reduction in e-mails
120% increase in local office visits 54 million 800 calls in FY 200354 million 800 calls in FY 2003
13. SSA Retirement Planner Survey, Q3/04http://www.socialsecurity.gov/r&m1.htm Overall Score 77
Content 82
Functionality 80
Look & Feel 81
Navigation 77
Site Performance 85
Tasks/Transactions 78
14. SSA Retirement Planner Survey, Q3/04--Futures Likely to Return 85
Recommend 83
File on-line 61
What’s wrong with this picture?
Is it good news or bad?
15. Retirement Planner—Custom Question How do you plan to file for retirement benefits? (7/12-8/9 data; N=1127)
On line 39%
Face to face 37
Telephone 4
On line w/SSA help 2
More recent data shows ‘on line w/help’ running ~13%, ‘on line’ ~30%--totaling more than 40% (not enough data for conclusions) On line w/help option added 8/4On line w/help option added 8/4
16. Pew Internet Studyhttp://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/128/report_display.asp How Americans Get in Touch with Government (May, 2004)
Telephone 40%
Web 24
In person 13
E-mail 11
Write a letter 10
17. Pew Internet Study—Cont’d Why Americans contact Government
Conduct Transactions 30%
Get specific information 25
Register opinions 19
Help w/specific problems 11
For complex, problem-solving contacts, 62% prefer phone/in person
Refer back to FAQ increase in local office visits; complex problem-solving contactsRefer back to FAQ increase in local office visits; complex problem-solving contacts
18. What Does This Tell Us About ROI for Retirement Planner? With ~40% interested in filing on line, SSA is doing quite well (compare Pew 30% transactions figure)
Futures Score shows opportunity to improve on-line application, as Boomers age and interest in on-line filing rises
New ‘On-line w/Help’ Numbers strong indicator for future, bearing out Pew conclusions on complex contacts
19. Internet Social Security Benefit Application (ISBA) Retirement/spouse applicants vastly more satisfied (>2:1) than disability applicants
Far more (5:1) retirement/spouse applicants successfully complete on-line application
Lowest scores in Functionality, Tasks/Transactions; cut across board, especially among disability applicants
Disability applicants have far lower level of Internet experience (5:1 “beginner”), and may need additional help
Expectations count: level of Internet experience inversely proportional to satisfaction
Pew study: only 40% of disabled use the Internet; 38% say their disability makes using the Internet harder or impossible; only 9% see Internet as preferred channelPew study: only 40% of disabled use the Internet; 38% say their disability makes using the Internet harder or impossible; only 9% see Internet as preferred channel
20. ISBA and ROI Lessons Retirement/spouse applicants >80% of ISBA customers; universe will grow as Boomers age and demand service (Pew data cited earlier)
Disability applicants have lower Internet experience, need more support via high-cost channels
The whole disability application process differs substantially from retirement application process
With resources limited, best use lies in improving overall Functionality, Tasks/Transactions
All applicants will benefit from general improvements in the on-line application Again, Pew survey on disabled Americans’ reluctance to use the InternetAgain, Pew survey on disabled Americans’ reluctance to use the Internet
21. Wrap ROI on your surveys not directly attributable to your survey expenditures
Ways of using ACSI data for ROI purposes
Identify user behavior that explicitly shows value of your site
Identify data that shows how you can improve your site to increase its value
Identify and focus your resource priorities
22. SSA Conclusions Main survey shows high value + return on 2003 site redesign
FAQ survey shows clear reduction in use of high-cost support channels as direct result of FAQ’s availability
Retirement Planner survey shows high value of Planner + the opportunity to focus our resources
ISBA Survey helps clarify resource priorities in limited-budget environment