1 / 11

COE e-Voting Review Meeting Madrid 16 October 2008

www.oasis-open.org. The OASIS Election & Voter Services Technical Committee Progress Report John Borras Chair Technical Committee. COE e-Voting Review Meeting Madrid 16 October 2008. Development of EML (Election Markup Language). OASIS TC History Formed March 2001

iorwen
Download Presentation

COE e-Voting Review Meeting Madrid 16 October 2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. www.oasis-open.org The OASIS Election & Voter Services Technical CommitteeProgress ReportJohn Borras Chair Technical Committee COE e-Voting Review Meeting Madrid 16 October 2008

  2. Development of EML (Election Markup Language) • OASIS TC History • Formed March 2001 • Chair since Aug 2001- UK Gov’t (currently Ministry of Justice) • Committee Membership • Governments, Corporations, Election Services providers, Academia

  3. The Challenge It is extremely unlikely that in the future elections will not have some e-enabled component(s). It’s probably more a question of how many components and when they are introduced. But there are still many concerns to be allayed and a good deal of confidence that needs to be built before e-voting becomes the norm. Standards are the base on which to build future e-enabled elections that will be trustworthy, open and creditable.

  4. EML Deliverables • Process and Data Requirements • Outlines voting processes • Identifies data requirements • Contains glossary of terms • Addresses security issues • XML Schemas • Overview of approach taken in preparing the schemas • 38 Individual schemas • White Paper – The Case for EML

  5. Current and Future TC work • Version 5.0 approved in Dec ‘07 • Awaiting approval as an ISO Standard • Compiling list of changes for inclusion in next version • Provide more advice and guidance on implementation issues • Assist with national localizations • Develop compliance accreditation processes • Ongoing enhancements to accommodate any changes in voting policies/legislation

  6. ISO/JTC1 Approval • Submitted by OASIS to ISO under PAS arrangements • Formal ballot by JTC1 voting members (40) • 44 observers without voting rights • Approval requires two-thirds majority of the voting members in favour and not more than one-quarter of the total number of votes cast against • Timescale – 2 months ballot, awaiting start date

  7. ISO/JTC1 Voting Members

  8. ISO/JTC1 Non-voting Members

  9. Take-up • UK election modernisation programme • Flemish local elections • USA Election Assistance Commission’s (EAC)draftVoluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG) encourages suppliers to use EML • Australian General Election • California State Elections • EU e-Poll project • Misc – EU Suppliers, USA VIP Project

  10. Summary Technology will not go away; future generations will demand its use Standards are the base on which to build future e-enabled elections that will be trustworthy, open and creditable EML is the recognised international open standard With your help we can evolve it to meet the challenges ahead Help us achieve ISO approval please

  11. John Borrasjohnaborras@yahoo.co.ukOASIS TCwww.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=election

More Related