1 / 18

Group 1 Presentation

Blueprints For Instruction. Group 1 Presentation. Juan G., Ray K., Annabel N., Pat M., Christie R. Introduction. Photo From http://www.istockphoto.com/file_search.php?action=file&text=teaching. Instructional design models Addie Kemp Sample Lesson on the Lunar Cycle

ivrit
Download Presentation

Group 1 Presentation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Blueprints For Instruction Group 1 Presentation Juan G., Ray K., Annabel N., Pat M., Christie R.

  2. Introduction Photo From http://www.istockphoto.com/file_search.php?action=file&text=teaching Instructional design models Addie Kemp Sample Lesson on the Lunar Cycle Comparison

  3. The ADDIE Model first appeared in 1975. It was created by the Center for Educational Technology at Florida State University for the U.S. Armed Forces The History Of The ADDIE Learning Model Mid 1980’s Early 1980’s 1975 ADDIE changes from a standard model to a more profound and dynamic model as it was utilized by the US. Army in 1984 as an “evaluation” tool. 1981 and six years later, Dr. Russell Watson (1981), Chief, Staff and Faculty Training Division of the Fort Huachuca, Arizona, presented a paper to International Congress for individualized Instruction.

  4. The History Of The ADDIE Learning Model (continued) 1990’s 2000’s While ADDIE strives to identify adequate on-the-job performance so that the learners can adequately learn to perform a certain job or task it was never meant to determine if training is the correct answer to a problem. Thus the first step when presented with a performance problem is to use a performance analysis tool. ISD basically becomes plug and play — you add other components to it on an as-needed-basis. For example, the ISD model below has Action Mapping, 4C/ID, and Prototyping plugged into it for designing a robust learning environment for training complex skills:

  5. The ADDIE Model Our approach. (2009). Retrieved July 18, 2010, from www.learningleaf.org/approach.html

  6. Instructional Problems Task Analysis Instructional Objectives Content Sequencing Instructional Strategies The Kemp Model Planning Revision Confirmative Evaluation Implementation Evaluation Instruments LearnerCharacteristics Development of Instruction Designing The Message Summative Evaluation Support Services Formative Evaluation Project Management Figure 1.  The Morrison, Ross, & Kemp Model (Gustafson, Branch, & Eric Clearninghouse, 2002, p.47).

  7. Instructional Problems Task Analysis Instructional Objectives Content Sequencing Instructional Strategies Not This… Planning Revision Confirmative Evaluation Implementation Evaluation Instruments LearnerCharacteristics START HERE! Development of Instruction Designing The Message Summative Evaluation Support Services Formative Evaluation Project Management Figure 1.  The Morrison, Ross, & Kemp Model (Gustafson, Branch, & Eric Clearninghouse, 2002, p.47).

  8. Instructional Problems Task Analysis Instructional Objectives Content Sequencing Instructional Strategies Or This… Planning Revision Confirmative Evaluation Implementation Evaluation Instruments LearnerCharacteristics Development of Instruction Designing The Message Summative Evaluation Support Services Formative Evaluation Project Management Figure 1.  The Morrison, Ross, & Kemp Model (Gustafson, Branch, & Eric Clearninghouse, 2002, p.47).

  9. Instructional Problems Task Analysis Instructional Objectives Content Sequencing Instructional Strategies The Kemp Model Planning Revision Confirmative Evaluation Implementation Evaluation Instruments LearnerCharacteristics Development of Instruction Designing The Message Summative Evaluation Support Services Formative Evaluation Project Management Figure 1.  The Morrison, Ross, & Kemp Model (Gustafson, Branch, & Eric Clearninghouse, 2002, p.47).

  10. Instructional Problems Task Analysis Instructional Objectives Content Sequencing Instructional Strategies The Nine Elements Planning Revision Confirmative Evaluation Implementation Evaluation Instruments LearnerCharacteristics Development of Instruction Designing The Message Summative Evaluation Support Services Formative Evaluation Project Management Figure 1.  The Morrison, Ross, & Kemp Model (Gustafson, Branch, & Eric Clearninghouse, 2002, p.47).

  11. Instructional Problems Task Analysis Instructional Objectives Content Sequencing Instructional Strategies First Outer Oval Planning Revision Confirmative Evaluation Implementation Evaluation Instruments LearnerCharacteristics Development of Instruction Designing The Message Summative Evaluation Support Services Formative Evaluation Project Management Figure 1.  The Morrison, Ross, & Kemp Model (Gustafson, Branch, & Eric Clearninghouse, 2002, p.47).

  12. Instructional Problems Task Analysis Instructional Objectives Content Sequencing Instructional Strategies Outer Oval Planning Revision Confirmative Evaluation Implementation Evaluation Instruments LearnerCharacteristics Development of Instruction Designing The Message Summative Evaluation Support Services Formative Evaluation Project Management Figure 1.  The Morrison, Ross, & Kemp Model (Gustafson, Branch, & Eric Clearninghouse, 2002, p.47).

  13. Instructional Problems Task Analysis Instructional Objectives Content Sequencing Instructional Strategies OuterOval Planning Revision Confirmative Evaluation Implementation Evaluation Instruments LearnerCharacteristics Development of Instruction Designing The Message Summative Evaluation Support Services Formative Evaluation Project Management Figure 1.  The Morrison, Ross, & Kemp Model (Gustafson, Branch, & Eric Clearninghouse, 2002, p.47).

  14. ADDIE and Kemp Comparison Figure 1. The ADDIE steps applied to the M-R-K Model (after Morrison, Ross & Kemp 2004, p.29)

  15. Instructional Design Examples Third Grade Science Lesson ADDIE KEMP http://michaelhanley.ie/elearningcurve/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/kemp-model-addie.jpg

  16. Conclusion Photo From http://www.istockphoto.com/file_search.php?action=file&text=teaching Process for Developing Instruction Addie Model: structure approach to ID Kemp Model: creative freedom Blueprint for instruction

  17. Thanks for Listening! Juan G., Ray K., Annabel N., Pat M., Christie R. Blueprints For Instruction

  18. References Akbulut, Y. (2007). Implications of two well-known models for instructional designers in distance education: Dick-Carey versus Morrison-Ross-Kemp.Online Submission, Retrieved from ERIC database.  Clark, D. (1995). Why Instructional System Design? Retrieved April 5, 2010 from http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/sat1.html DeSimone, R. L., Werner, J. M., Harris, D. M. (2002). Human Resource Development. Orlando, FL.: Harcourt, Inc. Dick, W., and Carey, L. (2004). The Systematic Design of Instruction. Allyn & Bacon; 6th ed. Gustafson, K., Branch, R., & ERIC Clearinghouse on Information and Technology, S. (2002). Survey of Instructional Development Models. Fourth Edition. Retrieved from ERIC database. Hanley, M. (2009, June 10).  Discovering instructional design 11: The Kemp model.  Message posted to http://michaelhanley.ie/elearningcurve/tag/addie. Learning Theories Knowledgebase (2010, July). ADDIE Model at Learning-Theories.com. Retrieved July 5th, 2010 from http://www.learning-theories.com/addie-model.html. Morrison, G., Ross, S., & Kemp, J. (2007). Designing effective instruction. John Wiley & Sons. Our approach.  (2009).  Retrieved July 18, 2010, from www.learningleaf.org/approach.html

More Related