250 likes | 494 Views
Role of the EHR in Healthcare Reform of Integrated Health Care Systems . Blackford Middleton, MD, MPH, MSc Partners HealthCare System, Harvard Medical School. Agenda. Principal components of healthcare reform Partners’ High Performance Medicine Current Research & Development
E N D
Role of the EHR in Healthcare Reform of Integrated Health Care Systems Blackford Middleton, MD, MPH, MSc Partners HealthCare System, Harvard Medical School
Agenda • Principal components of healthcare reform • Partners’ High Performance Medicine • Current Research & Development • Smart use of EMR: Clinical Decision Support • Quality Dashboards • Patient Activation • Clinical Decision Support Consortium
Principal Components of Healthcare Reform • President Obama’s FY 2010 Budget overview: • Reduce long-term growth of health care costs for businesses and government. • Protect families from bankruptcy or debt because of health care costs. • Guarantee choice of doctors and health plans. • Invest in prevention and wellness. • Improve patient safety and quality care. • Assure affordable, quality health coverage for all Americans. • Maintain coverage when you change or lose your job. • End barriers to coverage for people with pre-existing medical conditions. • The New Healthcare Policy “ABCDE” • Access • Best Quality • Cost • Disparities • (Comparative) Effectiveness
Partners HealthCare System • Eleven hospitals, 7000 physicians • $6.4B in revenues • 4M outpatient visits and 160,000 admissions/year • $1B in biomedical research annually • Teaching affiliate of the Harvard Medical School • Founded by the Brigham and Women’s Hospital and the Massachusetts General Hospital
Information Systems Descriptive Numbers • Operating budget (FY07) = $158M • Capital budget (FY08) = $45M • Number of users = 54,000 • Devices on the network = 71,000 • Locations on the Partners network = 140 • Electronic Medical Record physician users = 4,000 (> 100% of AMC PCPs; ~ 75% of Specialists) • Patients with data in the clinical data repository = 4,000,000 • Medical images on line = 450,000,000 • Orders entered hourly through Computerized Provider Order Entry (across Partners) = 1,000 • LMR (ambulatory EMR) transactions per day = 1M • Calls to the Help Desk each month = 18,000
Major Information Systems Initiatives • Provision of electronic medical records, computerized provider order entry, electronic medication administration records and clinical decision support to further the goals of High Performance Medicine • Implementation of COMPASS to standardize and improve revenue cycle processes across Partners • Creation of the next generation of healthcare information systems architecture through the Service Oriented Architecture (SOA) initiative
What is High Performance Medicine? HPM comprises five System-wide projects with one common goal: • To deliver better care to patients. • Care that is: • Safer • Better coordinated • More reliable in delivering proven interventions • Systems that support providers in “doing the right thing.” Dr. Jim Mongan http://www.partners.org/about/hpm.htm
What are the High Performance Medicine Initiatives? • Investing in quality and utilization infrastructure • Information systems applications • Informatics Infrastructure (data, knowledge, services) • Enhancing patient safety by reducing medication errors system-wide • Enhancing uniform high quality by measuring performance to benchmark for select inpatient and outpatient conditions • Expanding disease management programs by supporting activities for certain patients with chronic illnesses • Improving cost effectiveness through managing utilization trends and analysis of variance Infrastructure Quality Initiative Focus Efficiency
Clinical Systems Goals • To ensure comparability of clinical data across the enterprise • common data • To facilitate enterprise clinical decision support • common logic • To facilitate enterprise reporting and data mining • common reports, business intelligence • To facilitate enterprise standard clinical practice for providers and patients • common workflow – reduced unwarranted variation – where appropriate • To enhance our development agility by creating re-usable application components and services • common infrastructure, 1-4 above
Quality Measures and Requirements:Why is EMR Data Necessary? • Contractual measures are moving away from claims based measures to outcomes measures, which require clinical data elements • E.G. Diagnoses, Lab results, Blood pressure, Weight, Medications, Eye exam, Ejection Fraction • Tracking of performance and management of patients will be dependent upon data in EMRs • Settlement of 2008 contractual measures will no longer be dependant upon claims; we will need measure specific clinical values for all patients In the longer term, there will be a move to derive quality measures directly from the EMR, rather than from clinically enriched administrative data.
Many Partners’ applications utilize discrete data, logic and knowledge or rules; most are not integrated across sites – creating islands of information and supporting varying levels of functionality. Discrete vs. Shared: Data, Knowledge, Logic
MGH OE BWH OE LMR LOGIC(Services) The Future: Shared Data, Knowledge, and Logic – Partners SOA Strategy Future clinical applications will take advantage of shared repositories of enterprise data, knowledge, and logic, in a services-oriented architecture Common ‘Shell’ or Clinical Portal Shared Logic, Dictionaries, and Rules (Enterprise Clinical Services, Medication Services and Knowledge Management) Dictionaries And Rules Data (Knowledgebases) Enterprise Repository (s) Problems, Meds, Allergies, Labs, Orders, Notes, etc.
Current Research & Development • Smart use of EMR: Clinical Decision Support • Quality Dashboards • Patient Activation • The Clinical Decision Support Consortium
How can an EHR make a difference? Structure Process Outcome Adoption Get an EMR and use it Effective Use Use key EMRfeatures fully Smart Use Leverage EMRdecision support We are here Meaningful Use
Secure Clinical Communication And Notification of Results Automatic Reminders Summary Flowsheets Intuitive Chart Summary Coded Clinical Data Customizable Desktop
CAD/DM Smart Form Smart View: Data Display Documentation Window Assessment, Orders, and Plan Assessment and recommendations generated from rules engine • Lipids • Anti-platelet therapy • Blood pressure • Glucose control • Microalbuminuria • Immunizations • Smoking • Weight • Eye and foot examinations
Preliminary Results: Smart Form On Treatment Analysis <0.001 <0.001 0.05 0.004 0.006 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
CAD Quality Dashboard Targets are 90th percentile for HEDIS or for Partners providers Red, yellow, and green indicators show adherence with targets • Zero defect care: • Aspirin • Beta-blockers • Blood pressure • Lipids
Discrepancy Details
Provider Activation More medication changes in visits after diabetes journal submission: Grant RW et al. Practice-linked Online Personal Health Records for Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Arch Int Med 2007, in press.
CDS Consortium Goal To assess, define, demonstrate, and evaluate best practices for knowledge management and clinical decision support in healthcare information technology at scale – across multiple ambulatory care settings and EHR technology platforms. http://www.partners.org/cird/cdsc
Six Specific Research Objectives Knowledge management lifecycle Knowledge specification Knowledge Portal and Repository CDS Knowledge Content and Public Web Services Evaluation Dissemination
Thank you! Blackford Middleton, MD bmiddleton1@partners.org