1 / 8

Individualised Funding in Disability Services: Choice and Decision Making

Individualised Funding in Disability Services: Choice and Decision Making. Department of Communities (Disability Services) 30 July 2009. Policy and Service Context. United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with a Disability National Disability Agreement (2009)

jana
Download Presentation

Individualised Funding in Disability Services: Choice and Decision Making

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Individualised Funding in Disability Services:Choice and Decision Making Department of Communities (Disability Services) 30 July 2009

  2. Policy and Service Context • United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with a Disability • National Disability Agreement (2009) • Disability Services Act 2006 • Growing Stronger:Investing in a better disability service system • Introducing tailored service responses for individual needs

  3. Individualised Funding as a Continuum of Responses • A tailored person-centred approach aimed at empowering people with a disability with greater choice, flexibility and independence. • Is delivered through a range of funding mechanisms.

  4. Individualised Funding in Disability Services • Primarily, individual funding packages are held by a service provider to provide an agreed service to an individual. • The Disability Services Act 2006 specifies that the government can only provide funds to incorporated non-government service providers. • In Queensland, a small number of individuals have met the legal requirements for incorporation, in order to receive direct payments to manage their, or their family member’s, disability support. • Local Area Coordination, particularly to support people in rural and remote communities.

  5. Hybrid Funding Model • Combination of: • base block funding for the service provider to deliver shared accommodation support • Individual funding for the person for community access and additional individual care needs. • Seeks to provide more control and portability for the person, as accommodation options are independently viable and not dependent on pooling of individual funding packages.

  6. Self-Directed BrokerageFunding Model • A brokerage model of prevention and early intervention for: • children with a disability aged 0-6 years and their families and carers. • young people aged 20-35 years with an acquired physical disability. • The pilot of this model will aim to provide and assess the opportunity for greater choice, flexibility and independence for people with a disability.

  7. Research and Evaluation Base • Findings from the evaluation of the Direct Payments Project in Victoria include: • People with a disability, their families and carers are in control of choosing supports. • Resource allocation promotes choice and self determination of the person with a disability. • Planning and co-ordination of supports happens at the local level. • The need to identify quality outcomes for people with a disability, their families and carers who independently purchase services and supports. • The need for education, policies, tools and support to help the person with a disability, their families and carers to manage the purchase and payment of their chosen services and support including accountability requirements.

  8. Building on the evidence base • Development of individualised funding models to be considered in the context of firstly, meeting individual needs – using a continuum of funding packages. • Building evidence around benefits and issues of different funding approaches, including supports needed for individuals and service providers. • Continued focus on strengthening the system – equity, quality, viability, standards, transparency, and accountability. • Consideration of legislative context for individualised funding, including self-directed funding.

More Related