220 likes | 373 Views
SVD-2 status and experimental program SVD history SVD-2 setup Experiment characteristics as from April’2002 run Current status and physics program P.F.Ermolov SINP MSU Moscow. Talk at VHMP 2005, Dubna, Russia 16-17 April 2004. SVD-1 experiment.
E N D
SVD-2 status and experimental program • SVD history • SVD-2 setup • Experiment characteristics as from April’2002 run • Current status and physics program • P.F.Ermolov • SINP MSU Moscow Talk at VHMP 2005, Dubna, Russia 16-17 April 2004
SVD-1 experiment • Spectrometer with a Vertex Detector (SVD) on a proton beam channel #22 of Protvino 70 Gev accelerator went through few stages of development. • SVD-1 used a fast cycling bubble chamber as a vertex detector and a magnetic spectrometer with MWPC • With this setup, an estimate of near-threshold charm creation cross-section was obtained as
SVD-1 SVD-2 • To increase the rate of event collection, a bubble chamber was replaced by the MicroStrip Vertex Detector (MSVD) with 10,000 amplitude channels • To register neutral particles: 1,500-channels -detector • Particle identification: wide-aperture threshold Cerenkov detector
K- P-beam K- 1.a p+ 1 2 3 5 4 1 High precision microstrip vertex detector. 5 Gamma detector. 1a Active target with Si, C and Pb planes 2 Multiwire proportional chambers. 3 Magnet ( 1.18 T over 3m long region). 4 Multicell threshold Cherenkov counter. SVD-2 detector layout
SVD-2 tracking detector (cf. Karmanov’s talk) Tracking detectors 50 μm Si active target 1 mm strip pitch 4 mm inter-plane spacing 25 μm Pb C X Y 10 mm X Y Z from primary vertex reconstruction U W X Y X Y
SVD-2 run I (April '2002) • Intensity 500-600×103 protons/cycle (1.2 sec) • Total target thickness ~0.5% of hadronic length • 400-600 events/cycle registered • 53,000,000 events stored • Integral luminosity L=1.6 nb-1 • 3 target materials: Si, C and Pb
Experimental accuracies - geometry • X,Y-resolutions for tracks fitted: • From MSVD 8-10 m • Secondary tracks from spectrometer 700 m • Z-resolution: • for the primary vertex: 70-140 m • for the secondary vertex from MSVD: 200-300 m • Impact parameter resolution: ~ 14 m
Experimental accuracies • Momentum resolution for the 5 GeV tracks: 1% • Effective mass resolution: • K0: 4.4 MeV • : 1.6 MeV • 0 : 12 MeV • Cerenkov detector efficiency : 70% for the pions in 3-20 GeV momentum region
SVD-2M • 2003-2005 developments: • Liquid hydrogen target • A new vertex detector with a higher efficiency and a lower multiple scattering. New construction for replacing elements when needed • Much better tracking in a forward part of spectrometer due to 9 double planes of straw tubes with a 200 m resolution • Increased intensity capabilities of proportional chambers by installing beam killers
SVD-2M (cont.) • New fast electronics for gamma-detector readout • Efficiency of Cerenkov detector increased to 85-90% • 2 different triggers on the high multiplicity events are being created All these jobs are close to be finished soon and we hope for the successful tests during our end of 2005 run
Plans for 2005-2007 With a new setup we plan to make physics in 3 directions: • High multiplicities in hadron collisions with hydrogen target (first priority) • Near-threshold charm creation (Si, C, Pb targets) • Searches for new hadron states (both types of targets) The program is planned for years 2005-2007 with obtaining a total luminosity of ~ 50 nb-1.
On results of the physics analysis It will be discussed in more details in V.Popov talk. I would like to make a few comments. • High multiplicities. At this picture ,an event with 27 tracks in the vertex detector is presented.
On results of the physics analysis (cont.) • At this picture, the multiplicity distribution for the proton-carbon interactions is presented. Some slope changes could be seen near the 30 tracks point.
On results of the physics analysis (cont.) But Monte-Carlo simulations in Amelin model showed that there is a contribution to the multiplicity by the events with the secondary interactions in the same nucleus. So, for the detailed investigations we need to use a pure hydrogen target.
On results of the physics analysis (cont.) • 2. The main goal of the April’2002 run was to collect data on the charm creation cross sections near the threshold. An analysis proved to be rather complicated, and we hope to obtain a few hundred of events with D-mesons by the end of the year. We have already some events, and the little statistics is due to very rigid selection used by now.
As an illustration, here is an invariant mass distribution for K+- system with both tracks having large impact parameters in both x,y planes and its (secondary) vertex is within 3 mm from a primary one. Further analysis is going on. On results of the physics analysis (cont.)
On results of the physics analysis (cont.) • Remarks on the pentaquark search.In 2004, SVD collaboration published the results on the search of the narrow resonance in K0sp system. At the level of 5.5, we found a resonance with a <25 MeV and a cross-section of 30-120 b.
At this picture, a result of a resonance search made in the beginning of 2004 is presented. Main criteria were: Number of charged tracks in vertex detector 5 K0 registered if its decay length is 34 mm (average ~20 mm) With this criteria, ~ 5,000 events were selected and analyzed On results of the physics analysis (cont.)
In the first one , the same K0 decay region was used with another reconstruction method but without any selection criteria and without using Cerenkov detector informationThis resulted in a much higher number of K0 to be analyzed The second one:K0 decaying after the vertex detector (5-70 cm) were selected, using only spectrometer information to reconstruct tracks (“distant” K0)Possibly much higher number of K0 to be included into analysis New pentaquark analyzes (2004-2005) As a result , the total number of K0 was increased by more than an order of magnitude
New pentaquark analyzes (2004-2005) • At pictures, well pronounced peaks with a significance of about 6 each can be seen in the mass region of 1522-1524 MeV. • They are from two different samples , with a 300 events over background in total. Samples are not intersecting and are from the different kinematical regions. • It doesn’t look at all as a statistical fluctuation.
New pentaquark analyzes (2004-2005) We plan to make new cross-checks of our analysis, to study momentum and angular characteristics of this resonance and try to make conclusions on its creation mechanism