1 / 7

Low-Frequency Phase Rotation

Low-Frequency Phase Rotation. The UKNF phase rotator evolved from the CERN design  E reduction occurs in a single RF bucket: The Rees design used 67.5MV of peak voltage at 31.4MHz  180±23MeV goal. Problem with Two Signs. Negative muons are rotated backwards:

jbogan
Download Presentation

Low-Frequency Phase Rotation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Stephen Brooks Scoping Study meeting, July 2006 Low-Frequency Phase Rotation The UKNF phase rotator evolved from the CERN design E reduction occurs in a single RF bucket: The Rees design used 67.5MV of peak voltage at 31.4MHz  180±23MeV goal

  2. Stephen Brooks Scoping Study meeting, July 2006 Problem with Two Signs Negative muons are rotated backwards: 61/09% longitudinal efficiency for +/-

  3. Stephen Brooks Scoping Study meeting, July 2006 Solution (idea) for Two Signs I. Mixed-sign drifted bunch from decay channel II. Separate signs with on-peak RF III. Drift further to get separation in time IV. Put bunches on opposite sides of two adjacent wave troughs, to get the reverse sign separation and remaining phase rotation simultaneously

  4. Stephen Brooks Scoping Study meeting, July 2006 Output for 31.4MHz Dual-Sign!

  5. Stephen Brooks Scoping Study meeting, July 2006 Further Optimisation Efficiency was 37/45% for plus/minus Less of each, but more in total Allowing variation of RF frequencies has produced efficiencies of 47/56% Getting more bunches; higher frequency; looking a bit more like the Neuffer scheme?

  6. Stephen Brooks Scoping Study meeting, July 2006 Comments Note that while these efficiencies are comparable with Study 2a, the longitudinal phase space occupied is smaller Slightly smaller energy spread Many fewer bunches (but lower frequency) Bunch train well under 100ns long These schemes are longer and use more RF than the original (~130m vs. 42m)

  7. Stephen Brooks Scoping Study meeting, July 2006 Comments Future work will be to match the output bunches with those accepted into the Rees cooling ring or similar These are preliminary results So apologies for lack of scales on graphs etc.

More Related